Abstract: Objective To compare the change of left heart funct ion in pat ients w ith bio logical valves replacement of small ao rt ic roo t w ith mechanical valve rep lacement, and to find w hether there is p ro sthesis-patient mismatch (PPM ) or not after operation. Methods Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF ) , left ventricular fractional shortening (LVFS) , left vent ricular mass index, the indexed effective orifice area (EOA I) , and peak pressure gradients across aortic valve in 20 patients with small aortic root (≤21mm in diameter) receiving biological valves rep lacement (biological valves group ) were studied by Doppler echocardiography before the operation and 6 months to 1 year after operation. The results were compared with those of 20 patients who received mechanical valves replacement (mechanical valves group ). Results Comparing with those before operation, there was a significant increase in LVEF, LV FS, EOAI of all patients 6 months to 1 year after operation . There was a significant reduction in the left ventricular mass index, peak pressure gradients across aortic valve in all patients. EOAI of all patients were between 0.88 cm2/m2 and 1. 32 cm 2/m 2. LVEF, LVFS, EOAI, left ventricular mass index, and peak pressure gradients across aortic valve between biological valves group and mechanical valves group (79% ±8% vs. 81%±10%; 43%±9% vs. 37%±8%; 1. 11±0. 14 vs. 0. 92±0. 11; 89. 10±16. 70g/m 2 vs. 95. 30±15.10 g/m 2; 18. 80±12. 60 mmHg vs. 22. 30±12. 00 mmHg) showed no significant difference 6 months to 1 year after operation (P gt;0.05). Conclus ion Patients with small aortic root receiving biological valves have a significant increase in the left heart function, and have no PPM.
Abstract:Since 1978 the definition of prosthesis-patient mismatch（PPM） was first introduced by Rahimtoola, it has attracted the attention of foreign researchers. The PPM phenomenon is concerned to be an important factor which will affect patients＇ survival rate and quality of life. Till now, a lot of effort should still be put on this problem. But unfortunately, this problem is still being neglected in our country. This paper is a review of PPM from it＇s many aspects, such as definition, current research status, prevention, and it＇s research prospect. We hope this paper will intensify the clinicians＇ knowledge on PPM.
ObjectiveTo investigate hemodynamic changes in the early postoperative period of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) with different types of 19-mm mechanical heart valves. MethodsClinical data of 116 patients with aortic stenosis who underwent AVR in Beijing Anzhen hospital from January 2007 to January 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 61 male and 55 female patients with their age of 52±13 years. All the patients were divided into 3 groups according to different types of mechanical heart valves they received. In SJ. Regent valve group,there were 38 patients (33%) including 20 males and 18 females with their average age of 52±15 years. In Carbomedics valve group,there were 40 patients (34%) including 21 males and 19 females with their average age of 51±17 years. In On-X valve group,there were 38 patients (33%) including 20 male and 18 female patients with their average age of 55±16 years. Preoperative and postoperative left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) ejection fraction (EF) interventricular septal thickness,left ventricular wall thickness,trans-aortic valve velocity and pressure,and postoperative effective orifice area index (EOAI) were compared. ResultsThere was no statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative LVESD,LVEDD,EF,interventricular septum thickness and left ventricular wall thickness among the 3 groups (P>0.05). There was statistical difference in preoperative and postoperative trans-aortic valve velocity and pressure. Trans-aortic valve velocity of SJ. Regent valve group and Carbomedics valve group (244.30±33.67 cm/s vs. 249.69±79.13 cm/s vs. 294.83±52.05 cm/s) and trans-aortic valve pressure of SJ.Regent valve group and Carbomedics valve group (27.77±3.33 mm Hg vs. 33.58±18.90 mm Hg vs. 38.56±13.21 mm Hg) were significantly smaller than those of On-X valve group. ConclusionSt. Regent and Carbomedics mechanical heart valves demonstrate better hemodynamics in AVR patients receiving 19-mm mechanical heart valves.
ObjectiveTo discuss the influence of early postoperative hemodynamic, postoperative mortality and the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events with the phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 89 patients who had simple aortic valve replacement in our hospital bewteen January 2012 and January 2014. The 89 patients were divided into two groups including a match group (16 females and 48 males with average age of 58.1±10.4 years) and a mismatch group (15 females and 10 males with average age of 65.3±12.8 years). We compared early results between the two groups. ResultsThere is a statistic difference (P < 0.05) in aortic flow velocity, mean pressure gradient, and the maximum pressure gradient between the two groups. The survival rate of the match group is significantly lower than that of the mismatch group (P < 0.05). And there is a statistical difference in adverse cardiovascular event-free incidence between the two groups (P < 0.001). ConclusionThe phenomenon of prosthesis-patient mismatch can affect postoperative hemodynamic and lead to heart failure after surgery. And early mortality and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events in patients are increased due to prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Objective To analyze the incidence of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and ventricular remodeling of elderly patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR). Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 134 patient aged over 65 years who underwent AVR for the aortic stenosis or regurgitation at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2016. There were 73 males and 61 females aged 69.7±3.6 years ranging from 65-79 years. The clinical and ultrasound cardiography data were evaluated. PPM was defined as an effective orifice area index (EOAI) of ≤0.85 cm2/m2. The incidence of PPM and the left ventricular remodeling after surgical AVR in the patients with aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation was analyzed, and the outcomes of aortic valve mechanical prosthesis and aortic valve bioprosthesis were compared. Results The incidence of PPM was 32.5% in aortic stenosis and 13.0% in aortic regurgitation (P<0.05). One patient died in the early post-operation, and the incidence of severe PPM was 6.0%. Conclusion The incidence of PPM after AVR in the patients with aortic regurgitation is less than that in the patients with aortic stenosis.
Objective To summarize the application of double valve ring enlargement combined with mitral Chimney technique (Chimney Commando) in the secondary valve replacement and to analyze the efficacy in the near and medium term. Methods Patients who underwent the secondary aortic valve and mitral valve (double valve) replacement by Chimney Commando in Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital from 2019 to 2022 were included, and their clinical data were retrospectively collected to analyze the safety and feasibility of this procedure in secondary valve replacement of small aortic root patients. Results A total of 49 patients (44 females and 5 males) were included. The body surface area was 1.64±0.17 m2. The time from the first operation was 13.10±5.90 years. Except for 4 patients whose first operation was valvuloplasty, the remaining 45 patients were all patients after valve replacement, 41 patients of double valves replacement, including 39 patients with mechanical valve and 2 patients with biological valve. The majority of the aortic valves were St.Jude regent 19 mm or St.Jude regent 21 mm, accounting for 30.61% and 34.69%, respectively. The mitral valves were predominantly St.Jude 25 mm mechanical valves, making up 65.31%. All patients underwent Chimney Commando double valve ring enlargement, and the mean time of aortic occlusion was 154.00±45.40 min. The mean size of the aortic valve was 23.90±1.40 mm and that of the mitral valve was 28.20±1.20 mm, and the transvalvular pressure difference across the aortic valve was 20.16±5.76 mm Hg at 6 months postoperatively. There was one death during hospitalization due to multi-organ failure. The follow-up time ranged from 1 to 24 months with a median time of 8 months. Two patients were implanted with permanent pacemakers during the follow-up period and 1 patient died due to massive stroke and malignant arrhythmia. Conclusion Chimney Commando is safe and effective in patients with secondary double valve replacement, and the postoperative prosthetic valves have good hemodynamics, and can achieve good clinical results in the near and medium term.