west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Pulmonary metastasis" 3 results
  • The Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment for Pulmonary Metastases

    Objective To investigate the diagnosis, indications for surgery, operative methods and prognostic factors of surgical resection for pulmonary metastases, and improve the survival rate of patients with pulmonary metastases . Methods A total of 125 patients with pulmonary metastases underwent 138 metastasectomies,116 patients had metastasectomy once while 5 patients underwent a second metastasectomy and 4 patients a third metastasectomy. There were 66 wedge resections,2 segmentectomies, 53 lobectomies,2 en bloc resections of chest wall plus lobectomy,3 pneumonectomies and 12 precision resections. Surgical approaches included 130 thoracotomies and 8 videoassisted thoracic surgery. Results The primary tumor sites were epithelial in 94 patients ,sarcoma in 26 and others in 5. There was no perioperative mortality. A total of 122 patients were followed up , followup time was 1-10 years. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 90.4%, 53.3%, and 34.8% respectively. Better prognoses were found in patients with colorectal cancer, renal cancer and soft tissue sarcoma, the 5-year survival rates were 43.8%, 37.5%, and 33.3% respectively. For the 105 patients whose pulmonary metastases were resected completely, the 5-year survival rate was 38.9%. The 5-year survival rate was only 16.7% for 20 patients with incomplete resection, however. Systematiclymph node dissection had been performed in 89 patients but metastases were identified only in 12 patients. The 5-year survival rates were 14.3% for node positive patients and 41.5% for node negative patients. Conclusion Surgical resection for pulmonary metastases should be performed in properly selected patients and successful outcomes can be achieved. Posterolateral minithoracotomy is the most common surgical approach. The completeness of resection and the status of mediastinal lymph nodes may be important prognostic factors.

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:04 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • CLINICAL OBSERVATION OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT FOR RECURRENT GIANT CELL TUMOR OF BONE

    Objective To discuss the surgical selection and effectiveness for patients with recurrent giant cell tumor of bone. Methods Between February 1988 and June 2007, 79 patients with recurrent giant cell tumor of bone were treated. There were 42 males and 37 females, with a mean age of 33.1 years (range, 15-72 years). In primary surgery, 76 patients underwent intralesional curettage, and the other 3 patients underwent resection; the recurrence time was 2-176 months after primary surgery. The locations of tumor were upper extremities in 14 cases and lower extremities in 65 cases. According to Companacci grade, 1 case was at grade I, 33 cases at grade II, and 45 cases at grade III before primary surgery. In secondary operation, 37 patients underwent intralesional curettage and bone grafting combined with adjuvant inactivated, and 42 patients underwent wide resection. Results Bone allograft immune rejection occurred in 2 cases, which led to poor healing; primary healing of incision was obtained in the other patients. The patients were followed up 68 months on average (range, 18-221 months). Recurrence occurred in 12 patients at 6-32 months after operation. The re-recurrence rate was 24.3% (9/37) in cases of intralesional curettage and bone grafting combined with adjuvant inactivated, and they were given the wide resection. The re-recurrence rate was 7.1% (3/42) in cases of wide resection and they were amputated. There was significant difference in the re-recurrence rate between the intralesional curettage and the wide resection (χ2=4.508, P=0.034). No recurrence was observed during 3-year follow-up among re-recurrence patients. Conclusion For benign recurrent giant cell tumor of bone, intralesional curettage and bone grafting combined with adjunctive therapy could get an acceptable effectiveness, however, it has higher local recurrence than wide resection. For large tumor and recurrent malignant giant cell tumor of bone, wide resection is recommended.

    Release date:2016-08-31 04:05 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factor Analysis of Surgical Resection of Pulmonary Metastases after Esophagectomy

    ObjectiveTo investigate clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of surgical resection of pulmonary metastases after esophagectomy. MethodsClinical data of 15 patients who underwent surgical resection of pulmonary metastases after esophagectomy from March 1994 to May 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 10 males and 5 females with their age of 43-72 (65.0±8.8) years. Surgical procedures included partial lung resection, pulmonary wedge resection, segmental resection and lobectomy. Follow-up duration was 60 months after surgical resection of pulmonary metastases. The influence of number and size of pulmonary metastases, TNM staging of primary esophageal cancer, and disease-free interval (DFI) after esophagectomy on postoperative survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy was analyzed. ResultsTwelve, 24 and 60 months survival rates after pulmonary metastasectomy were 80.0%, 66.7% and 6.7%, respec-tively. Median DFI was 30 months. Survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy of patients whose DFI was longer than 24 months was significantly longer than that of patients whose DFI was shorter than 24 months (χ2=5.144, P=0.023). Survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy of patients with solitary pulmonary metastasis was significantly longer than that of patients with multiple pulmonary metastases (χ2=3.990, P=0.046).The size of pulmonary metastases and TNM staging of primary esophageal cancer didn't have significant impact on survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy (P > 0.05). Cox proportional hazards model showed that DFI after esophagectomy was the main factor affecting survival rate after pulmonary metastasectomy (P=0.026). ConclusionSurgical resection is a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of pulmonary metas-tases after esophagectomy, and may achieve good clinical outcomes for patients with solitary pulmonary metastasis and patients whose DFI is longer than 24 months.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content