ObjectiveTo analyze the relationship between image development types and delay time in computed tomography urography (CTU) examination and to investigate the value of choosing reasonable delay time to get the best images. MethodWe collected the data of 62 patients who underwent multi-slice CTU examination without fully developed images within 8 minutes from January 2010 to May 2014. There were 35 unilateral and 27 bilateral delayed imaging patients with a total of 89 cases. According to the degree of imaging development after the delayed 8 minutes, we divided it into 4 levels as follows:level 0 (no development), levelⅠ (light development), levelⅡ (partial development) and levelⅢ (full development). LevelⅢ was not included in this study. For level 0 to levelⅡ, we delayed scan for 15 to 1 440 minutes. ResultsAs the imaging development degree decreased, the delay time obviously extended. LevelⅡ could be fully displayed after 15 to 150 minutes of delayed scan. LevelⅠ could be fully displayed after 150 to 720 minutes. Level 0 still had no imaging development after 120 minutes, so there was no need to continue scanning. ConclusionsSelecting appropriate delay time of CTU based on the type of delayed imaging development can avoid unnecessary repeated delay scans, get the best development images, and estimate the kidney secretion functions, which is most helpful for accurate diagnosis of urinary system related diseases.
ObjectiveTo compare the short-term effectiveness of femoral prosthesis with different neck-shaft angles for the reconstruction of proximal femoral anatomy after total hip arthroplasty (THA). MethodsBetween January 2012 and December 2013, 101 patients undergoing unilateral THA who accorded with selection criteria were selected for a retrospective study. The patients were divided into 2 groups:during THA, femoral prosthesis with 135° neck-shaft angle was used in 52 patients (group A) and femoral prosthesis with 127° neck-shaft angle was used in 49 patients (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, weight, body masss index, pathogeny, disease duration, preoperative neck-shaft angle, leg discrepancy, and preoperative Harris score between 2 groups (P>0.05). The postoperative Harris score was recorded to evaluate the effectiveness. And the femoral offset of the operated and contralateral sides, the change value of the femoral offset (xFO), the ratio of xFO to the offset of contralateral side (sdFO), the number of patients whose sdFO was more than 15% or less than -15% (outlier), the global offset, the height of femoral head rotation center, and leg discrepancy were measured at postoperation. ResultsOperative incision healed by first intension in 2 groups; no complication of infection, dislocation, or revision was found. All patients were followed up 12-32 months (mean, 23 months). The Harris score at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with preoperative score in 2 groups (P＜0.05), but there was no signficant difference between 2 groups (t=1.267, P=0.832). The xFO and sdFO of group B were significantly larger than those of group A (P＜0.05); the number of outlier was 20 in group A and was 33 in group B, showing significant difference (P=0.005). The height of femoral head rotating center and global offset at 3 months after operation showed no signficant difference between 2 groups (P>0.05). And significant improvement in leg discrepancy was found at 3 months in 2 groups (P＜0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups (t=0.403, P=0.689). ConclusionBoth of the two femoral prosthesis with different neck-shaft angles can restore the proximal femoral anatomy well and gain similar early effectiveness after THA. However, the Stryker Trident femoral prosthesis with 127° neck-shaft angle may have the tendency to enlarge the femoral offset.