Objective To evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of traditional Chinese medicine published inChinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, and to analyze changes. Methods We searched CNKI to collect RCTs published inChinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (CJITWM) in 2014. Reporting quality of RCTs was evaluated by using CONSORT 2010 checklist, the methodological quality and ethics requirements were also analyzed. The changes of quality was also analyzed by comparing with those of 2004. Results A total of 80 RCTs were included. The top three interventions were Chinese patent medicine, decoction, acupuncture. Items with high reporting rate (>80%) included abstract, participants, randomization sequences and informed consent. Items with reporting rate of 50% to 80% including introduction, interventions, harms and funding, and others were all less than 50%. Among them, the reporting quality of title, trial design, outcomes, sample size, type of randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, numbers analyzed, outcomes and estimation, generalizability, interpretation, registration and protocol was less than 10%. Compared with those of 2004, the quality of reporting, methodology, and ethics has all increased. Significant progress was made in items of structured summary, background and objectives, collecting participants, adverse reactions, quality control standards of TCM interventions, diagnostic evaluation criteria of TCM, follow-up, funding, ethical approval and informed consent. But small progress was made in randomization, allocation concealment and implementation, sample size, blinding and ITT. There has been no participant flow. Conclusion The quality of reporting, methodology, and ethics of RCTs published inChinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine have made some progress, however, trial design, outcomes selection, estimation of sample size, randomization, blinding, registration and participant flow are still needed to be further improved.
Objective To investigate the efficacy of LDL-C lowering treatment on NSTE-ACS, and to analyze the target LDL-C level for clinical treatment. Methods PubMed, EMbase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science databases were searched up to January 2016 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of LDL-C lowering therapy on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with NSTE-ACS. Two reviewers independently screened litertures, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using Stata12.0 and RevMan 5.3 software. Result A total of 12 RCT including 4 702 individuals with NATE-ACS were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the statin group could significantly reduced the risk of MACE (RR=0.68, 95% CI 0.549 to 0.834,P=0.000). With 18.68 months of follow-up, patients in target LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group had lower risk of MACE than other LDL-C level group. When LDL-C lower 20% to 40% than baseline with 28.99 months follow-up, patients in target of LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group had lowest risk of MACE (RR=20.143, 95% CI 6.946 to 58.414,P=0.000). Conclusion LDL-C lower treatment can lower the risk of MACE in patients with NSTE-ACS. Patients in target LDL-C level from over 70 mg/dL to less than 100 mg/dL group have relatively low risk of MACE, in which patients who lower 20% to 40% LDL-C than baseline will get more benefits from LDL-C lowering therapy.