Objective To summarize operative procedure and the effectiveness of open reduction with internal fixation or radial head replacement for the treatment of Essex-Lopresti injury. Methods Between November 2002 and October 2010, 10 patients with Essex-Lopresti injury were treated. There were 8 males and 2 females with a mean age of 36 years (range, 20-56 years). Eight cases were fresh closed fracture within 2 days. According to Mason classification, 5 fracture were typeII, 3 were type III. The other 2 cases were old fracture within 3 months. Wrist joint X-ray revealed that all the patients had distal radioulnar joint dislocation. Open reduction with internal mini-plate or absorbable screw fixation was performed in 5 cases, and radial head replacement in 5 cases; meanwhile, the distal radioulnar joint was reducted and fixed. Results All incisions healed by first intention without infection or bone nonunion. The patients were followed up 7 to 24 months with an average of 14.7 months. The X-ray films showed fracture heal ing at 9-20 weeks (mean, 16.3 weeks); distal radioulnar joint was stable without shortening or shift of proximal radius. According to elbow cl inical evaluation system, the results were excellent in 5 cases, good in 3 cases, and fair in 2 cases. According to wrist cl inical evaluation, the results were excellent in 7 cases, good in 2 cases, and fair in 1 case. All patients had good elbow stabil ity, and recovered quickly. Conclusion Early diagnosis, operation, and functional exercises are important to obtain an excellent result in treating Essex-Lopresti injury.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of reconstruction of forearm interosseous membrane (IOM) using extensor carpi radialis longus combined with radial head replacement for restoring the forearm longitudinal stability. MethodsTen fresh-frozen adult cadaveric forearms were selected, including 8 males and 2 females with a mean age of 38.2 years (range, 29-74 years). Each forearm was treated as following steps: radial head excision (group A), radial head excision+the distal ulnar radial joints separation (group B), radial head excision+the distal ulnar radial joints separation+IOM central band excision (group C), reconstructed IOM with extensor carpi radialis longus tendon (group D), radial head prothesis replacement (group E), and reconstructed IOM with extensor carpi radialis longus tendon+radial head prothesis replacement (group F). The distance between ulna and radius and radioulnar joint displacement were observed under load and non load. The force loading on both ends of specimen was recorded when the radius shifted 5 mm proximally. ResultsRestoring the radial length could maintain normal distance between radius and ulna. The interosseous membrance reconstruction could restore the load transmission between radius and ulna. The force loading specimen was (74.507±4.967), (49.227±1.940), (17.827±1.496), (24.561±1.390), (140.247±8.029), and (158.423±9.142)N in groups A, B, C, D, E, and F respectively when the radius shifted 5 mm proximally, showing significant difference among groups (P < 0.01). ConclusionReconstruction of the IOM with the extensor carpi radialis longus tendon is insufficient to restore the forearm longitudinal stability. Reconstruction using extensor carpi radialis longus tendon combined with radial head replacement may be a new choice for treatment of forearm longitudinal instability.