Objective To evaluate the curative effectiveness and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) vs. radical surgery (RS) for the patients with rectal malignant tumor, and to provide information for clinical research and practice. Methods Through computer searching The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, OVID, CBM and CNKI from inception to April 2010, and hand searching relevant journals including Chinese Journal of Surgery and Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled trails (NRCTs) comparing TEM with RS for rectal malignant tumor were collected. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane collaboration’s software RevMan 5.0. Results One RCT and four NRCTs met the selection criteria, involving 929 patients. The methodological quality of all trials was low with possibility of bias. The meta-analyses showed that: a) Three studies reported local recurrence in T1 stage patients. There was a significant difference in local recurrence between the two groups (OR=12.61, 95%CI 2.59 to 61.29, P=0.002); b) Two studies reported disease-free survival in T1 stage patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups in disease-free survival (OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.31 to 4.12, P=0.86); c) Three studies reported overall survival in T1 stage patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups (OR=1.09, 95%CI 0.57 to 2.08, P=0.80); and d) Three studies reported postoperative complications in T1 stage patients. There was a significant difference between the two groups in terms of complications (OR=0.05, 95%CI 0.02 to 0.10, Plt;0.00001). Conclusion For T1 stage patients, TEM is associated with less injury of tissue, less operative bleeding, short duration of hospital stay, and low incidence of postoperative complications. The disease-free and overall survivals are comparable to those of RS, but the local recurrence rate is higher. The role of TEM in T2 stage patients is still under discussion. However, the trails available for this systematic review are of lower methodological quality, and bias may exist due to NRCTs. Therefore, more high quality RCTs are required.
ObjectiveTo analyze effect of percutaneous transhepatic choledochus drainage (PTCD) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. MethodsClinical data of 67 cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma who treated in our hospital from Jan. 2005 to Dec. 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsOf the 67 cases, 30 cases were performed PTCD, 20 cases were performed radical surgery after PTCD, and 17 cases were performed palliative surgery after PTCD. There were 59 cases who were followed-up for 3-30 months, and the median time was 9.3 months. The median survival time of patients who underwent PTCD, radical surgery, and palliative surgery were 10.2, 21.4, and 8.9 months respectively. The survival of patients who underwent radical surgery was better than those of underwent PTCD (χ2=13.6, P=0.000 4) and palliative surgery (χ2=15.2, P=0.003 8), and survival of patients who underwent PTCD was better than patients underwent palliative surgery (χ2=5.3, P=0.040 1). ConclusionsPTCD is contribute to preoperative diagnosis and evaluation, in addition, it can reduce unnecessary surgical exploration, guarantee the safety of the radical surgery, and provide follow-up care for palliative operation channel which is favorable for local internal radiation therapy.
ObjectiveTo investigate the surgical complications and its influence factors of radical surgery in the treatment of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. MethodsTwo hundreds and sixteen patients with colorectal cancer who were treated in the Second People's Hospital of Lianyungang City from January 2010 to September 2014 as the research object, the clinical data were collected by the self-made general data questionnaire, and they were analyzed by descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis using SPSS 19.0. ResultsFor elderly patients with colorectal cancer radical operation, pulmonary infection and wound infection were the common complications.Single factor and logistic regression analysis showed that medical comorbidity, hypoproteinemia, operation time, Dukes staging, and smoking were risk factors of postoperative complications in the colorectal cancer patients. ConclusionFor elderly patients with colorectal cancer underwent radical operation, pulmonary infection and wound infection are the common complications.It's occurrence by various factors.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of da Vinci robotic surgery for elderly patients with pulmonary lobectomy. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 50 patients in General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region of Thoracic Surgery between May 2012 and March 2015.The patients were divided into two groups. Twenty five patients aged over 70 years underwent radical operation of lung cancer with da Vinci Robot System were allocated into a robot group with 17 males and 8 females at age of 72.6 ±2.5 years. Another 25 senile patients with radical surgery by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were allocated into a thoracoscopic group with 17 males and 8 females at age of 72.5±2.4 years. The patients in the two groups underwent pulmonary lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection. The clinical effect of the two groups was compared. ResultsAll patients were diagnosed as lung cancer. Twenty five patients all completed surgery under da Vinci Robot System in the robot group. In the thoracoscopic group, one patient was converted to thoracotomy. There were statistical differences in amount of blood loss (66.2±44.2 ml vs. 356.0±349.2 ml, P=0.000), lymph node number (23.2±9.8 vs. 11.3±5.6, P=0.012), and postoperative bed time (3.5±0.9 d vs. 4.2±1.1 d, P=0.017) between the two groups. Effect in the robot group was superior to that in the thoracoscopic group. ConclusionDa Vinci robotic surgery system for elderly patients with lung cancer radical surgery is safe, effective, and less thoracoscopic surgery trauma, recovery faster.