Objective Inappropriate drug dosage is a serious problem in pediatrics, mainly due to the lack of clinical evidence in children, suitable preparation formulation, and standardized methods for dose adjustment. A method for evaluating and monitoring appropriate dosage in pediatrics is urgently needed. The drug utilization index (DUI) based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical/Defined Daily Dose (ATC/DDD) has been widely used in the assessment of appropriate dosage in adults. We explored possible methods for assessing appropriate dosage in children. Methods Based on our previous studies, we discuss cDUI in the assessment of appropriate dosage in children as follows: the meaning of cDDD, the establishment of a standardized system, and the classified evaluation of dosage in pediatrics. Results Although the definition of cDDD draws on the concept of defined daily dose (DDD), the meaning of cDDD is different from that of the latter. Specifically, the purpose of cDDD is to evaluate appropriate pediatric dose, while DDD is a unit of measurement. cDDD could be used to assess dose rationality for common and serious pediatric diseases, and would be refined over time. A single cDDD should be assigned per drug and indication and given per drug and route of administration. The influence of age, weight, diagnosis, and administration route on the dosage should be considered. Classified evaluation should be used and weight should be given to the above mentioned factors in order to evaluate the appropriate dose objectively and comprehensively. Conclusion Dosage regulation in pediatrics has an important role in improving medical quality and protecting the safety, effectiveness, and economy of medical therapy in children. The establishment of a cDUI system is a good try in pediatric dosage evaluation. Although there are still defects within this proposed system and methodology, the principle seems feasible.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the rationality of antibiotics use by analyzing the prescription reviewing results.MethodsThe review data of antibiotic prescriptions in Beijing Hospital was randomly selected from 2016 to 2019, from which unreasonable prescriptions and the antimicrobial agents were analyzed, and the use of antibiotics and unreasonable prescriptions annually were compared.ResultsThe evaluation of rational use of antibiotics involved 79 701 outpatient prescriptions from 2016 to 2019. There were 10 drugs in the top five irrational rates of outpatient antibiotics, primarily cephalosporin and quinolones, accounting for 50% and 30%, respectively. The primarily unreasonable problems were over prescription (common in gastroenterology and dermatology), unsuitable indications (common in otolaryngology), inappropriate usage and dosage (common in urology, dermatology and gastroenterology), and failure to write clinical diagnosis or incomplete clinical diagnosis (common in obstetrics and gynecology and general surgery). During the four years, the proportion of antibiotics prescriptions and the irrational rate decreased annually.ConclusionsThe use of antibiotics in outpatient department of Beijing Hospital has achieved initial results, however, there are still some problems. We should further strengthen the management of antibiotics usage, strengthen training and learning, and increase medical cooperation to promote rational drug use in clinic.
The purpose of this paper is to discuss the evaluation standard of rationality of medical examination from different perspectives, so as to provide theoretical evidence for medical department to establish the evaluation standard of the rationality of medical examination. By researching the relevant literature in the field of rational medical examination and combing the existing research results, this paper discusses the evaluation criteria of the rationality of medical examination from four dimensions: technology, ethics, law, and health economy. The following four suggestions are proposed for the current status of medical examination: construct clinical pathway management to avoid excessive medical examination; establish the internal supervision and evaluation mechanism to improve the professional quality of medical staff; improve medical examination-related policies, laws, and regulations, carry out specialized legislation; apply diagnosis-related group payment method, control the cost of medical examination.