Objective To summarize the application of different types of perineal and vaginal reconstruction after posterior exenteration with resection of distal vagina and perineal body for patients with primary or recurrent advanced rectal cancer with distal vagina or perineal body invasion， and to review the advantages and shortages and the application range of common reconstructive surgical procedures. Method The clinical data of 10 rectal cancer patients underwent extended surgery with distal vagina and perineal body resection accompanied with or without hysterectomy from October 2009 to September 2013 were summarized. Results There was no perioperative mortality. Omental flaps were used for obliteration of pelvic defect in 4 patients. The uterus was pushed backward to fill the pelvic defect after severing the round ligament in 2 patients. A reversed pedicled sigmoid flap was employed for reconstruction of the vagina in 2 patients. The reversed flap of anterior vaginal wall was used for vaginal and perineal reconstruction in 3 patients. Three cases had postoperative complications， in which included 1 patient with pelvic sepsis who underwent reoperation for drainage， 2 patients with perineal wound infection. All other patients had an uneventful healing postoperatively. Conclusions Some types of one-stage pelvic and perineal-vaginal reconstruction after posterior exenteration with resection of distal vagina and perineal body could produce an expedited wound healing with acceptable morbidity. Despite the well documented pedicled musculocutaneous flap for reconstruction， omental flap， pedicled sigmoid flap， overturn of anterior vaginal wall for reconstruction and pushing-back of the uterus for filling pelvic cavity might also result in reduced pelvic and perineal associated complications. Pedicled musculocutaneous flap is better reserved for huge pelvic and perineal defect and should be recommended among Chinese surgeons.
Objective To investigate the relation between artery location for anastomosis and recipient’s hepatic arterial anatomic variation or pathological abnormity in adult liver transplantation. Methods From March 2004 to July 2006, 80 cases of adult orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) were performed in this hospital. Preoperative magnetic resonance angiography combined with operative artery dissection were performed to recognize and classify the hepatic arterial variation or pathological abnormity, then the arterial anastomotic location and stoma diameter were recorded. The location and diameter of anastomosis were compared between variation group and non-variation group. Results The recipient’s hepatic arterial variation rate was 11.3%(9/80), 8/9 of variable artery were right hepatic arteries which arose from gastroduodenal artery (GDA), common hepatic artery (CHA), celiac artery or superior mesenteric artery. The locations for anastomosis were the branch patches of CHA (7/9) and GDA (2/9). The pathological abnormities comprised of hepatic arterial intimal dissection (1 case) and hepatic arterial stenosis (1 case), the corresponding anastomotic location was the end of CHA in former case and anterior wall of suprarenal aorta in latter case. The proportion of anastomotic locations differed statistically between variation group and non-variation group (χ2=18.679, P＜0.01). The anastomotic diameter of CHA branch patch in variation group had no statistic difference compared with branch patch of CHA or proper hepatic artery (PHA) in non-variation group (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion The recipient’s hepatic arterial variation influences the selection of locations for anastomosis, the branch patch of CHA is the preferred location. The anastomotic stoma diameter of PHA branch patch in non-variation group obtains a similar size of CHA branch patch in variation group, the PHA branch patch can be used as a common location when arterial variations are absent.