Acute kidney injury (AKI), as a complex and severe kidney disease, has always been the hotspot of research. The epidemiological research of AKI in China has made significant progress, including initially reports on the domestic incidence of AKI, geographical distribution and risk factors; however, accompanying challenges like AKI prevention and treatment emerge. For improvement of the diagnosis and treatment of the AKI, this article summarizes and analyses the two challenges: early warning biomarkers and AKI treatment strategies, based on new ideas and research progress. The aim is to make Chinese nephrology scholars and specialists realize the focus of AKI prevention and protection of renal function, to standardize the treatment strategy of AKI, and to put forward the direction of future research.
Heart and kidney interact with each other. Cardio-renal syndrome (CRS) refers to conditions where acute or chronic dysfunction of either the heart or the kidney leads to dysfunction of the other. Conventional classification of CRS outlined five subgroups according to the clinical presentation. This review focused on the epidemiology, new bio- markers, drug management, and renal replacement therapy of type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ CRS, which emphasized the multi-discipline collaboration and individualized evaluation, in order to achieve goal-directed approach to renal replacement therapy.
ObjectiveTo compare dialysis catheter function and complications according to catheter site in patients undergoing hemopurification.MethodsLiteratures were searched from PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data, and VIP Database according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Publication years of these literatures ranged from April 1998 to April 2018. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.3 software. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for uncontinuous outcomes, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95%CI were calculated for continuous outcomes. The incidence of catheter related infection, other complications and patients outcome were compared between different sites for dialysis vascular access.ResultsA total of 9 articles were included, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 7 observational clinical studies, and 5 220 adult patients undergoing renal replacement therapy. Meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in incidences of catheter colonization or catheter-related bloodstream infection, as well as arterial puncture, local thrombosis, catheter dysfunction and spontaneous catheter withdrawal, between femoral and non-femoral (jugular or subclavian) catheterization (P≥0.05). Whereas the incidence of bleeding and local hematoma was lower in femoral catheterization [OR=0.44, 95%CI (0.23, 0.82), P=0.009], and the duration of catheters was shorter in femoral catheterization [WMD=–1.40 d, 95%CI (–2.17, –0.62) d, P=0.000 4]. The blood flow rate, filters clotting incidence and patients intensive case unit mortality were similar in different catheterization.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing renal replacement therapy, the bleeding and local hematoma incidence is lower in femoral catheterization but the duration of catheters is shorter. Nevertheless the patients have similar clinical outcome. This result may provide reference for clinical decision-making.