Objective To investigate the clinical features of pnuemonia in renal transplant recipients in order to improve the clinical diagnostic and treatment efficacy.Methods The clinical data of 29 recipients with pneumonia following renal transplantation in Peking University People’s Hospital from January 1,1999 to July 31,2006 were collected and analyzed retrospectively.Results Of the 29 cases with pneumonia，one case（3.4%，1/29）were diagnosed as nosocomial acquired pneumonia and twenty eight cases（96.6%，28/29）as community acquired pneumonia.Of the total,cytomegalovirus （CMV） pneumonia were validated in 19 cases, bacteria pneumonia in 10 cases, fungus pneumonia in 3 cases,and Pneumocystis Carini infection in one case while none pathogen were confirmed in 5 cases with pneumonia.37.5%（9/24）cases with pneumonia which pathogen were ascertained were resulted from multiple pathogen infection.Opportunistic organism is the main pathogen of pneumonia in renal transplant recipients and the disease commonly manifested as interstitial pneumonia. 27 cases（93.1%）developed to severe pneumonia in which 15 cases were deteriorated to acute respiratory distress syndrome.Excluding 5 cases who withdrew from the hospital,4 cases （16.7%，4/24）died and 20（83.3%，20/24） cases were cured.During the second to the sixth month especially the second to the thrid month after renal transplantation the recipients were at higher-risk of pneumonia.Conclusions The majority of pneumonia in kidney recipients were severe community acquired pneumonia caused by multiple pathogens.CMV pneumonia and bacteria pneumonia are the most common types and major causes of mortality.Mortality of fungus pneumonia and CMV pneumonia are highest.Proper diagnostic procedures and therapeutic strategies are critical to improve survival rate.
Objective To compare the short-term effectiveness between primary cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after renal transplantation. Methods The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed from 18 patients (21 hips) with ONFH after renal transplantation undergoing cemented THA in 11 cases (13 hips) (cemented group) and uncemented THA in 7 cases (8 hips) (uncemented group) between February 2005 and February 2012. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, ONFH stage, preoperative Harris score, and bone density between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). Postoperative complications were observed in 2 groups; the hip function was assessed based on Harris scores; X-ray film was used to observe the prosthetic situation. Results All the wounds healed by first intention. The patients were followed up 6-77 months (mean, 46 months) in the cemented group, and 4-71 months (mean, 42 months) in the uncemented group. Femoral prosthesis infection occurred in 1 case (1 hip) respectively in each group; hip dislocation, femoral prosthesis loosening, and acetabular prosthesis loosening occurred in 1 case (1 hip) of the cemented group, respectively. At last follow-up, the incidences of postoperative complications and revision rate of the cemented group were 30.7% (4/13) and 23.1% (3/13) respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the uncemented group [12.5% (1/8) and 0 (0/8)] (P=0.047, P=0.040). Harris score was significantly increased to 94.1 ± 3.7 in the uncemented group and 90.0 ± 4.2 in the cemented group, showing significant differences compared with the preoperative scores in 2 groups (P lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between 2 groups (t=1.815, P=0.062). Postoperative X-ray films showed that the initial position of the prosthesis was satisfactory. At last follow-up, the bone fixation, fibrous stability, and loosening of the femoral prosthesis and loosening of acetabular prosthesis occurred in 9 hips, 3 hips, 1 hip, and 1 hip of the cemented group, respectively; bone fixation of the femoral prosthesis and stability of acetabular prosthesis were observed in all hips of the uncemented group. There was no heterotopic ossification in 2 groups. Conclusion Uncemented THA after renal transplantation can obtain satisfactory short-term effectiveness, and uncemented THA is better than the cemented THA; however, the middle- and long-term effectivenesses need further observation．
Objective To review the vascular anatomy of the donor and the reci pient for the l iving kidney transplantation. Methods The recent l iterature about the vessels of donor and reci pient in cl inical appl ications was extensively reviewed. Results The pertinent vascular anatomy of the donor and recipient was essential for the screening of the proper candidates, surgical planning and long-term outcome. Early branching and accessory renal artery of the donor were particularly important to deciding the side of nephrectomy, surgical technique and anastomosing pattern, and their injuries were the most frequent factor of the conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. With increase of laparoscopic nephrectomy indonors, accurate venous anatomy was paid more and more attention to because venous bleeding could also lead to conversion to open nephrectomy. Multidetector CT (MDCT) could supplant the conventional excretory urography and renal catheter angiography and could accurately depict the donors’ vessels, vascular variations. In addition, MDCT can excellently evaluate the status of donor kidney, collecting system and other pertinent anatomy details. Conclusion Accurate master of related vascular anatomy can facil iate operation plan and success of operation and can contribute to the rapid development of living donor kidney transplantation. MDCT has become the choice of preoperative one-stop image assessment for living renal donors.
To establ ish a simple and stable cervical ectopic renal transplantation rat model that increase surgical successful rate. Methods A total of 208 male inbred Wistar rats (weighing 220-260 g) were randomly served as donors and recipients. The graft consisting of kidney, renal vein (RV) and renal artery (RA) was obtained, and perfused in situ. The donor RA was end-to-end anastomosed to the recipient left common carotid artery (CCA) by using of “sleeve” anastomosis,and the donor RV to the recipient right external jugular vein by using of “cuff” technique. The distal end of the ureter wasbrought out to form cervical cutaneous stomas. Results A total of 104 ectopic renal transplantations were performed in rats, including stages of the pre-experiment (62 operations) and experiment (42 operations). The success rates of the two stages were 80.6% and 95.2%, respectively. The causes of failure in the pre-experimental stage were anesthesia accidents, thrombosis of the arterial anastomosis, massive hemorrhage, air embol ism and phlebemphraxis. In the experimental stage, 2 rats died due to late anastomotic hemorrhage and thrombosis. The remaining 40 transplanted kidney survived more than 6 months. The time for surgery was (40 ± 6) minutes, the average time for donor surgery was (20 ± 5) minutes, the preparation time for the graft was (8 ± 2) minutes, the operative time for the recipient was (18 ± 3) minutes, including the time for the arterial anastomosis (5 ± 2) minutes and venous anastomosis (2 ± 1) minutes, the cold ischemia time of graft was (15 ± 3) minutes. Conclusion The cervical ectopic renal transplantation technique has the advantages of easy-and fast-to-perform, shorter operation and cold ischemia time, higher successful rate.
Objective To improve arterial anastomosis method for rat renal transplantation. Methods Renal transplantations were performed on 72 wistar rats. The donor superior mesenteric artery was end-to-end anastomosed to the recipient left renal artery by using of sleeve anastomosis technique. The external diameters of the vessels anastomosed were 0.60±0.05 mm (left renal artery) or 0.80±0.07 mm (superior mesenteric artery). The procedure consisted of a guidingsuture and two fixing sutures. The guiding suture was used to “telescope” therecipient left renal artery into the donor superior mesenteric artery about 2 millimetre. Two fixing sutures were applied 180°apart from each other and tied. Three sutures passed through all layers of the donor superior mesenteric artery andconstricted the vessel lumen, but only penetrated the adventitia of the recipient left renal artery. Results The time for arterial anastomoses was approximately 6 to 8 minutes. The renal grafts perfused very well after the recipient left renal artery clamp was removed. Complications included anastomotic hemorrhage(1 case) and thrombosis (1 case). Histologic examination of 34 grafts at different postoperative time ranging from 6 to 30 days revealed that renal artery was fully patent, with no evidence of ischemic injury. Conclusion The modified arterial sleeve anastomosis technique is simple and feasible regardless of experimentalcondition and can be easily performed.
The experience on management of abnormal blood vessels in 128 cases of donor kidney during the tailoring operation was reported. The various techniques used for different types of abnormal arteries and veins, and the critical points which should be paid attention to have been discussed. It was concluded that the multiple renal arteries should be treated in a single renal artery and anastomosed with internal iliac artery or/and external iliac artery. The appropriate management given to abnormal renal blood vessels during the tailoring operation may shorten the warm ishemia time, ensure the renal blood supply, reduce the renal vasular complication, and promote the recovery of renal function.
Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of steroid withdrawal in modern triple immunosuppressant (Cycloproine/Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil and Steroid) on renal transplantation recipients. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966-Sep. 2005), OVID (1966-2004), EMBASE (1984-2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2005), CBMdisc (1994-2005), and handsearched 7 Chinese Journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) adopting modern triple immunosuppressant, and comparing steroid withdrawal (SW), group and steroid continuing group (SC) were selected. The quality of included studies was evaluated and graded according to Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook 4.2.5, and meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Nine RCTs including 1 681 patients (845 in SW and 836 in SC) were identified. The average follow-up time was 6-12 months. No significant difference was found in using CsA or Tac in modern triple immunosuppressant. The results of our meta-analysis showed: ① the risk of acute rejection was two times higher in SW than SC (RR 2.05, 95% CI 1.54 to 2.72, P lt;0.000 01), mainly Banff grade I (mild) (RR 1.92, 95% CI 1.16 to 3.17, P =0.01); but no significant differences were found on Banff grade II and III between the two groups. ② the rate of graft and patient survival and chronic rejection were the same between two groups. ③ Steroid withdrawal decreased the incidence of opportunistic infection (mainly caused by simplex herpes virus and Candida) and urinary tract infection. While the incidence of CMV and sepsis infection has no significant difference between two groups. Conclusion Steroid withdrawal within 3 months in modern immunosuppressive regimen ① increases the risk of Banff Grade I rejection reaction, but the moderate and severe rejection are similar between the two groups; ② doesn’t affect the rate of graft, patient survival, and chronic rejection; ③ decreases the incidence of opportunistic and urinary tract infection, but doesn’t improve the CMV infection and sepsis. To prophylaxis serious infection, steroid withdrawal is worth considering under sufficient immunosuppressive regimen. The key point is to balance the benefit and harm for individual recipients.
Objective To evaluate the safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) for rejection after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Jun. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to Jun. 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004) and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979 to Jun. 2004). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MMF with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.1.1 software. Results Twenty-Four RCTs comparing MMF (2 g/day or 3 g/day) with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were identified. The digest system morbidity of MMF group was higher than that of AZA group. The incidence of vomiting, bellyache and diarrhea of MMF 3 g/day group was statistical by higher than that of AZA group (P＜0.05). The cytom egalovirus (CMV) infection morbidity of MMF 3 g/day group during 6 months, 1 year and 2 years follow-up was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but for MMF 2 g/day group, this difference was only seen during 1 year follow-up. Leukopenia incidence of MMF 3g/day group was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but this difference was not seen in MMF 2 g/day group. Thrombocytopenia incidence of MMF 3 g/day group was lower than AZA group with statistical difference. For skin carcinoma morbidity, no statistical difference was found among MMF 3 g/day, MMF 2 g/day and AZA groups. Conclusions Compared with AZA, MMF represents higher digest system side-effects incidence, higher morbidity of leucopenia and CMV infection and lower incidence of thrombocytopenia. The dose-response relationship of adverse drug reaction is found.
Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of tacrolimus and cyclosporine A on acute rejection, chronic rejection and survival rate of patient and graft after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1989 to Nov.2004), EMBASE (1989 to Nov.2004), The Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1998 to Nov.2004), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2004) and handsearched 8 Chinese journals. Trials comparing tacrolimus with cyclosporine A after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.2.7 software. Results Eighteen studies involving 3 738 patients were included. Tacrolimus was more effective in decreasing the incidence of acute rejection and chronic rejection than that of cyclosporine A with RR 0.65, 95％CI 0.56 to 0.75 at the end of 6 months; with RR 0.70, 95％CI 0.54 to 0.92 at the end of 12 months for number of patients of acute rejection. The pooled RR was 0.65 (95％CI 0.47 to 0.89) for number of patients of chronic rejection. Tacrolimus could reduce the severity of acute rejection. The relative risks of pathologic grade BanffⅠand Banff (Ⅱ＋Ⅲ) were 1.64 (95％CI 1.08 to 2.49) and 0.75 (95％CI 0.63 to 0.89) respectively. But there was no significant difference on the survival rate of patient and graft within 5 years between the two groups. The relative risk of 6, 12, 24, 36 and 60 months were 1.01 (95％CI 0.99 to 1.02), 1.00 (95％CI 0.99 to 1.02), 1.01 (95％CI 0.97 to 1.05), 1.00 (95％CI 0.97 to 1.03) and 0.97 (95％CI 0.88 to 1.07) respectively for the survival rate of patient and 1.04 (95％CI 1.01 to 1.07), 1.03 (95％CI 1.00 to 1.06), 0.99 (95％CI 0.91 to 1.07), 1.04 (95％CI 0.99 to 1.09) and 1.04 (95％CI 0.90 to 1.21) respectively for the survival rate of grafts. Conclusions On acute rejection and chronic rejection, tacrolimus is more effective than cyclosporine A, but there is no difference in the graft or patient survival rate.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA) after renal transplantation. Method Searching: Medline, Embase, Cochrane library and Chinese Biomedicine database (CBM); identified the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and applied Revman 4.11 for statistical analyses. Results Twenty-two RCTs were identified, involving MMF and AZA for anti-rejection after renal transplantation. The data shown that MMF (2 g/d) was more beneficial than AZA in improving the graft survival rate of short periods and the long-term patient survival rate, but there was no statistical differences between MMF (3 g/d) with AZA. Whether in 6 months or in 1 year after renal transplantation, the use of MMF (2 g/d) or MMF (3 g/d) could markedly reduce the incidence of biopsy-proven rejection. Conclusions Comparing with AZA, MMF is a more potent immunosuppressive drug, and more efficient in reducing the acute rejection after renal transplantation. MMF can improve the graft and patient survival rate. The 2 gram per day is more acceptable.