ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of His-bundle pacing (HBP) and right ventricular pacing (RVP).MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies on efficacy of HBP and RVP from inception to December, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 studies involving 1 130 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: HBP group was superior to RVP group in QRS duration (MD=–43.88, 95%CI –52.53 to –35.22, P<0.000 01), LVEF (MD=4.53, 95%CI 2.67 to 6.38, P<0.000 01), and NYHA (MD=–0.85, 95%CI –1.14 to –0.56, P<0.000 01). However, the operation time (MD=15.21, 95%CI 11.44 to 18.98, P<0.000 01) and fluoroscopy duration (MD=2.98, 95%CI 2.10 to 3.85, P<0.000 01) of HBP group were longer than that of RVP group.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with RVP, HBP is superior in maintaining of QRS duration, LVEF and NYHA; however, the operation time is longer. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusion.