Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ropivacaine in spinal anesthesia. Methods We searched PubMed (1999 to 2008), OVID (1999 to 2008), EBSCO (1999 to 2008), The Cochrane Library (2000 to 2008), and CNKI (1999 to 2008) databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ropivacaine and bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. The quality of the included RCTs was evaluated by two reviewers independently, and meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.0 software. Results Six RCTs were included. The methodological quality of them were all poor. Among the six RCTs, 215 patients received ropivacaine and 215 received bupivacaine. The results of meta-analyses showed that the motor-block time to complete block of ropivacaine was significantly shorter than that of bupivacaine (WMD=2.18 min, 95%CI 0.32 to 4.03, P=0.02). The motor-block time to complete recovery of ropivacaine was significantly shorter than that of bupivacaine for cesarean delivery in spinal anesthesia (SMD= – 1.82, 95%CI – 3.05 to – 0.59, P=0.004). The incidence rate of hypotension and bradycardia in spinal anestheisa with ropivacaine was lower than that with bupivacaine (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.31 to 0.80, P=0.004; OR=0.40, 95%CI 0.03 to 4.99, P=0.47). Conclusion Equivalent doses of ropivacaine and bupivacaine provide similar analgesia in spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. However, haemodynamics in spinal anesthesia with ropivacaine fluctuate lightlier than with bupivacaine. Ropivacaine is suitable for spinal anesthesia in low-abdominal operations.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect and safety of subgluteal approach continous sciatic nerve block with 0.2% ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in calcaneal fracture patients. MethodsForty calcaneal fracture patients treated from May 2012 to January 2013 were randomly assigned to two groups:20 patients in continuous sciatic nerve block group (group CSB) and 20 patients in self-controlled intravenous analgesia group (group PCIA).Patients in group CSB were given subgluteal approach continuous sciatic nerve block,and PCA pump was connected to give 0.2% ropivacaine via continuous nerve block catheter continuously for analgesia.Patients in group PCIA were given PCA pump directly for self-controlled intravenous analgesia.The movement/rest VAS scores and Ramsay scores at 2,8,24,48 hours after surgery,the dose of other analgesia drugs after surgery,the satisfaction of patients and surgeons,and side effects were recorded. ResultsThe movement and rest visual analogue scale (VSA) scores and the dose of analgesia drugs in group CSB were significantly lower than group PCIA at all time points (P<0.05).The satisfaction of patients and surgeons in group CSB was higher than group PCIA (P<0.05). ConclusionCompared with self-controlled intravenous analgesia,subgluteal approach continuous sciatic nerve block with 0.2% ropivacaine can provide better and safer postoperative analgesia for calcaneal fracture patients.
ObjectiveTo compare the functioning time, duration, cervical vascular blood flow and adverse effects of different concentrations of ropivacaine mesylate in performing stellate ganglion block (SGB) under Doppler ultrasound. MethodsA total of 240 patients (grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ classified by American Society of Anesthesiologists) aged between 23 and 62 years old ready to undergo SGB between January and April 2013 were chosen for our research. They were randomly divided into two groups with 120 patients in each. Group A and B received unilateral SGB with 7 mL of 0.239% and 0.596% ropivacaine mesylate respectively. Successful SGB was verified by Horner syndrome. The functioning time, duration, hemodynamic changes, cervical vascular blood flow and adverse effects were recorded and compared. ResultsHorner syndrome was observed in all patients. There was no significant difference in functioning time between the two groups (P>0.05). The duration of functioning was significantly longer in group B than that in group A (P<0.05). No significant difference was found in hemodynamic changes after SGB (P>0.05). No adverse effects were found in both groups. The blood flow of the vertebral artery and the internal carotid artery before the injection and 10 minutes after the injection were not significantly diferent (P>0.05). ConclusionSGB can be induced with 0.239% and 0.596% ropivacaine mesylate. We suggest using 0.596% ropivacaine mesylate by ultrasound-guiding because of the significantly longer functioning duration.
ObjectiveTo assess postoperative analgesia and early rehabilitation of continuous incision infiltration with ropivacaine in open gastrectomy. MethodsFrom June 2011 to October 2014, 50 patients underwent open gastrectomy were divided into two groups:standard analgesic therapy group (Abbreviation:standard group, n=25) and continuous incision infiltration with ropivacaine group (Abbreviation:ropivacaine group, n=25). All the patients were also given patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA). Points of visual analog scale (VAS), Bruggrmann comfort scale (BCS), and nausea and vomiting were assessed at different time during the first 48 hours postoperatively. Total sufentanil dosage, the first postoperative ambulation time, bowel recovery time, postoperative hospital stay, and incision infection rate were compared between two groups. ResultsAt 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, 24 h, 48 h postoperatively, the points of VAS in the ropivacaine group were significantly lower than those in the standard group (P < 0.05), the points of BCS in the ropivacaine group were significantly higher than those in the standard group (P < 0.05). Compared with the standard group, the dosage of sufentanil was significantly less (P < 0.05), the bowel recovery time, the first postoperative ambulation time, and the postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter (P < 0.05), the point of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower (P < 0.05) at 48 h postoperatively in the ropivacaine group. There was no difference of the incision infection rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). ConclusionContinuous incision infiltration with ropivacaine is effective and safe to relief postoperative pain and accelerate patient's recovery after open gastrectomy.
Objective To compare the analgesic efficiency and safety of subacromial bursa continued ropivacaine analgesia with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods A total of 64 patients undergoing rotator cuff repair surgery between October 2013 and February 2015 were randomly divided into the subacromial bursa group (JFX group, 32 cases) and the patient-controlled intravenous analgesia group (JM group, 32 cases). At the end of surgery, a catheter was inserted into the subacromial bursa of the patients in JFX group under arthroscopic visualisation and fixed properly, and analgesia pump was connected after surgery; in JM group, analgesia pump was connected to the vein channel after surgery. The pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (motion and rest) scores 1 hour and 12, 24, 48, 72 hours after surgery, adverse reactions, use of analgesic pump, number of additional analgesia and patients satisfaction were recorded. Results There were no differences between the two groups in the number of additional analgesia, patients satisfaction, additional use of antiemetic drugs, motion and rest VAS scores 1 hour and 12, 72 hours after surgery, and the incidence of moderate-severe pain (VAS≥4) at each time point (P>0.05). The motion and rest VAS scores 24, 48 hours after surgery in JFX group were lower than those in JM group, the analgesia times and the incidence of nausea and vomiting in JFX group were lower than those in JM group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Efficiency of subacromial bursa infiltration of ropivacaine sustained analgesic is slightly better than that of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, with lower incidence of adverse reactions.