Objective To review the efficacy and safety of interventions for preventing infections in nephrotic syndrome using evidence-based principles for clinicians to practice easily. Methods We searched Cochrane controlled trials register database, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Chinese Biologic Medical database. Results Total 11 articles were obtained including RCTs, non-controlled clinical studies and traditional narrative reviews. No systematic review or meta-analysis was identified. Prophylactic interventions for reducing risks of infection in nephrotic syndrome included intravenous immunoglobulin, thymosin, traditional Chinese herb, lamivudine, pneumococcal vaccination and chemoprophylaxis. Conclusion At present, the studies about interventions for preventing infection in nephrotic syndrome were limited in quantity and poor in the quality of methodology, therefore, the promising conclusions were unavailable. Rigid randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials with blinding or systematic review or meta-analysis would be very necessary for further assessing the efficacy and safety of the prophylactic interventions for preventing infections in nephrotic syndrome
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of polyethersulfone highflux dialyzer for uremic patients. Methods Forty eligible uremic patients were randomized into two groups, i.e. polyethersulfone (PES) group and polysulfone(PSF) group, according to a random number table. The PES group received hemodialysis for 4 hours with polyethersulfone highflux dialyzer (Chengdu OCI Medical Device Co., Ltd), and the PSF group with polysulfone highflux dialyzers (Fresenius Polysulfones, Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Changes in serum creatinine, urea, β2-microglobulin, hemoglobin and albumin levels were determined for efficacy and safety evaluation. Results All the 40 patients completed the trial. The serum creatinine, urea, β2-microglobulin levels of all the patients in the two groups decreased (gt;30%) after the hemodialysis with different highflux dialyzers, and no significant difference was observed between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Changes in solute clearance index (KT/V) value, hemoglobin and albumin levels were also comparable between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions The efficacy and safety of the PES hollow fiber membrane hemodialyzer is equivalent to that of the PSF hemodialyzer in hemodialysis for uremic patients.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of Fushenqudu capsules in the treatment of chronic renal failure. Methods The double blind, double dummy and randomized controlled method was adopted. One hundred and thirty one patients were randomized to the trial group (n=88, Fushenqudu capsule, 4 capsules, qid) and the control group (n =43, Shenshuaining capsules, 4 capsules, qid). The therapeutic duration for both groups was 8 weeks. Results The results were analyzed on the basis of intention-to-treat. For effectiveness of treatment, the markedly effective rate was 27.3% (24/88); the total effective rate was 67.0% (59/88) in the treatment group; the markedly effective rate was 25.6% (11/43), the total effective rate was 58.1% (25/43) in the control group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). For effectiveness of Pishenqixu syndrome, the markedly effective rate was 48.9% (43/88) and 53.3% (23/43) respectively in the trial and control groups. No statistically significant difference was tested between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). Mild adverse effects occurred in two groups. When a smaller dose or termination of the drug were applied, the symptoms went. The tolerance was good when the patients took the medicine regularly. Conclusions Fushenqudu capsules have the same clinical effect as Shenshuaining capsule with a little toxic adverse effects.
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of prulifloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infection. Methods The double-blind, double dummy and randomized controlled method was adopted. One hundred and forty-four patients were randomized to the treatment group (prulifloxacin , 4 tablets, bid) and the control group (levofloxacin, 4 tablets, bid). The randomization code was produced by computer. The treatment duration for both groups was from 7 to 10 days. Results Data were analyzed on the basis of full analysis sets (FAS) and per-protocol (PP) analysis. The total improvement rates of the trial and control groups were 85.07% and 88.52% respectively by FAS analysis, and 90.48% and 91.53% respectively by PP analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups in improvement rates (Pgt;0.05). Bacterial negative rates in the trial and control groups were 93.75% and 93.88% respectively by FAS analysis and 97.83% and 97.87% respectively by PP analysis. The results showed no statistical significance difference between the two groups in bacterial negative rates (Pgt;0.05). The adverse events in the prulifloxacin and levofloxacin groups were 2.80% and 5.60% respectively. Conclusion Prulifloxacin has the same clinical effectiveness as levofloxacin with a few toxic adverse effects in the treatment of urinary tract infection.