west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "ST segment elevation myocardial infarction" 4 results
  • Clinical and Angiographic Characteristic of Patients with Spontaneous Reperfusion in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

    Objective To study the clinical and angiographic features in ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) patients with spontaneous reperfusion. Methods A total of 519 patients with STEMI underwent Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from January 2006 to December 2009 in Anzhen Hospital were enrolled. All patients were divided into the spontaneous reperfusion group (TIMI flow gradeⅢ ) and the non-spontaneous reperfusion group (TIMI flow grade 0-Ⅱ ) according to the TIMI flow grade before primary PCI. The incidence rate of spontaneous reperfusion through coronary angiography before primary PCI was observed, and the clinical relevant factors and angiographic lesion features of spontaneous reperfusion were analyzed. Results There were significant differences in age, CTnI peak value, high thrombus burden, and lesion location in distant LAD (P=0.000, 0.000, 0.002, 0.000, and 0.003, respectively) between the two groups. But there were no significant differences in gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, hyperlipemia, angina pectoris history, culprit vessel distribution, lesion distribution in LCX and RCA, and collateral circulation between the two groups (Pgt;0.05 for all). Conclusion Compared to the patients without spontaneous reperfusion, patients with spontaneous reperfusion are younger in age, lower in CTnI peak value, and heavier in thrombosis burden, with culprit lesions mostly located in the distant LAD.

    Release date:2016-09-07 10:58 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Significance of Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Risk Score and Serum Cardiac Troponin I Concentration in the Risk Stratification of Non ST Segment Elevation Myocaridial Infarction

    ObjectiveTo study the relationship between plasma cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) risk score in patients with acute non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI),and to assess the value of low GRACE risk score combined with plasma cTnI concentration in predicting hospital cardiovascular events in NSTEMI patients. MethodA total of 168 patients with NSTEMI treated between January 2011 and December 2012 were included in this study. Their serum CTnI level was measured instantly and on the second day (within 24 hours) to get the peak value. GRACE risk score was calculated by computer rating software. According to the GRACE risk score,risk stratification was performed,and patients were divided into low-risk group (n=48),middle-risk group (n=75) and high-risk group (n=45). Routine treatment was carried out for the patients during hospitalization. ResultsThe serum cTnI peak value was higher in high-risk patients than that in low-risk patients and middle-risk patients (P<0.05). The cTnI peak value was significantly higher in the middle-risk patients than in the low-risk patients (P<0.05). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in low-risk patients with higher serum cTnI peak value was relatively higher. Age,hyperlipidemia,and serum cTnI were closely related to MACE (P<0.05). ConclusionsFor NSTEMI patients with a low GRACE score,the MACE rate increases with the increase of serum cTnI concentration. GRACE low score and cTnI concentration have a certain clinical value in assessing the risk of MACE in NSTEMI patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • The Effect of Continuous Improvement of Quality Control Mechanism on the Emergency Treatment Efficiency for Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Chest Pain Center

    ObjectiveTo explore the effect of continuous improvement of quality control system on the emergency treatment efficiency for patients with acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after the establishment of Chest Pain Center. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the differences of theory examination scores acquired by the Chest Pain Center staff one month before and after they got the system training. Moreover, we designated the STEMI patients treated between May and August 2015 after the establishment of Chest Pain Center but before optimization of process to group A (n=70), and patients treated from September to December 2015 after optimization of process to group B (n=55). Then we analyzed the differences between these two groups in terms of the time from patients' arriving to registration, the time from arriving to first order, the length of stay in Emergency Department, and even the time from door to balloon (D2B). ResultsThe scores acquired by Chest Pain Center staff before and after system training were 69.89±6.34 and 87.09±4.39 respectively, with a significant difference (P<0.05). All the time indicators of both group A and group B were shown as median and quartile. The time from patients' arriving to registration of group A and group B was 6.0 (0.0, 11.0) minutes and 1.0 (0.0, 3.0) minutes (P<0.05); the time from arriving to first order was 12.8 (9.0, 18.0) minutes and 5.0 (3.0, 9.0) minutes (P<0.05); the length of stay in Emergency Department was 54.0 (44.0,77.0) minutes and 33.0 (20.0, 61.0) minutes (P<0.05); and the time of D2B was 107.5 (89.0, 130.0) minutes and 79.0 (63.0, 108.0) minutes (P<0.05). ConclusionAfter taking measures such as drawing lessons from the past, training staff and optimizing process continuously, we have significantly shortened the acute STEMI patients' length of stay in the Emergency Department, which has saved more time for the following rescue of STEMI patients.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of establishment of chest pain center and optimized process in the diagnostic and treatment progress and short-term prognostic value of acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients

    ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of establishment of chest pain center and optimized process in the diagnostic and treatment progress and short-term prognostic value of acute non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. MethodsThis was a retrospective study. We included NSTEMI patients admitted in the Emergency Department in our hospital, 41 patients admitted before the establishment of the chest pain center (April 2015) were included as group A (30 males and 11 females at age of 64.7±11.8 years), 42 patients after the establishment of the chest pain center (April 2016) as group B (31 males and 11 females at age of 64.6±11.8 years), and 38 patients after the establishment of the chest pain center (April 2017) as group C (30 males and 8 females at age of 62.6±10.0 years). The clinical outcomes of the three groups were compared.ResultsThe time from admission to electrocardiogram was 20.0 (17.0, 25.5) min in the group A, 4.0 (2.8, 5.0) min in the group B, and 3.0 (2.0, 4.0) min in the group C (P<0.001). The first doctor's non-electrocardiogram advice time was 13.0 (10.0, 18.0) min, 9.5 (6.8, 15.3) min, and 9.0 (7.0, 12.0) min (P=0.001) in the three groups, respectively. The diagnostic confirmed time was 139.4±48.5 min, 71.1±51.5 min, 63.9±41.9 min (P<0.001). The proportion of patients receiving emergency dual anti-platelet load dose treatment was 53.1%, 70.0%, 100.0% (P=0.001), respectively. The time of receiving emergency dual anti-platelet load dose treatment was 208.0 (72.0, 529.0) min, 259.0 (91.0, 340.0) min, and 125.0 (86.0, 170.0) min (P=0.044) in the three groups, respectively. Emergency percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI) start time was 60.9 (42.1, 95.8) hours, 61.3 (43.3, 92.2) hours, 30.5 (2.8, 44.1) hours (P<0.001) in the three groups, respectively. Among them, the moderate risk patients’ PCI starting time was 63.0 (48.1, 94.2) hours, 62.3 (42.1, 116.2) hours, and 40.1 (17.2, 60.4) hours (P>0.05), respectively. The high risk patients’ PCI starting time was 47.9 (23.7, 102.4) hours, 55.2 (44.0, 89.6) hours, 23.2 (1.7, 41.8) hours in the three groups, respectively (P<0.001). The hospitalization time of the patients was 7.0 (5.4, 9.4) days, 5.9 (4.9, 8.7) days, 4.7 (3.1, 6.2) days in the three groups (P<0.001), respectively. The hospitalization time of the moderate risk patients was 6.9 (4.9, 8.8) days, 6.4 (4.9, 8.0) days, 4.8 (3.2, 6.5) days in the three groups (P>0.05), respectively. The hospitalization time of the high risk patients was 7.1 (5.5, 9.9) days, 5.9 (4.6, 9.8) days, and 4.4 (3.0, 6.1) days, respectively (P<0.001). The fatality rate of inpatients was 4.9%, 0.0%, and 0.0%, respectively (P>0.05). The correlation coefficient of hospitalization time, diagnosis confirmed time and PCI starting time was 0.219 and 0.456 (P<0.05), respectively.ConclusionThe establishment and optimized process of chest pain center can accelerate the time of early diagnosis of NSTEMI, which is helpful to obtain stratified and graded standardized treatment for patients according to their conditions, to accelerate the specific treatment process of high risk NSTEMI patients, and shorten the hospitalization time.

    Release date:2019-04-29 02:51 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content