ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins in ambulatory surgery.MethodsPatients who underwent radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins between May 2018 and June 2019 in General Hospital of Northen Theater Command were prospectively selected. According to their choices of treatment modes, patients were divided into two groups, day surgery group and routine inpatient group. The preoperative waiting time, length of hospital stay, and hospitalization expenses of the two groups were compared. The postoperative pain, tenderness, and complications were followed up on the first day (the next day after operation), the third day, and the fourteenth day after operation, and the time of return to normal life and work and patients’ satisfaction in two groups were recorded.ResultsA total of 95 patients were enrolled, including 52 in the day surgery group and 43 in the routine inpatient group. There was no significantly difference in age, gender, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, or operation time between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine inpatient group, the day surgery group had shorter preoperative waiting time, shorter length of hospital stay, and lower hospitalization expenses (P<0.05). In the day surgery group, the time of return to normal life and the time of return to work were shorter and patients’ satisfaction was significantly higher than those in the routine inpatient group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in pain, tenderness, or paresthesia scores between the two groups after surgery according to the follow-up assessment (P>0.05); the pain, tenderness, and paresthesia scores on the first day and the third day were significantly different from those on the fourteenth day after surgery, indicating that the longer the postoperative time of the two groups, the less pain, tenderness, and paresthesia scores were.ConclusionRadiofrequency ablation of great saphenous varicose veins in ambulatory surgery has a short hospital stay, low medical cost, high patient satisfaction, and can ensure the safety of treatment at the same time, which is worthy of clinical promotion