Abstract： Objective To investigate the effect of salvianolate on myocardium against ischemiareperfusion injury (IRI) in valve replacement with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), its outcome and mechanism, and the applicability and safety of salvianolate as a protection agent for CPB central muscles. Methods Thirty patients undergoing cardiac valve replacement were randomly divided into two groups by lot. In the control group, there were 15 patients including 5 males and 10 females, while in the 15 patients in the trial group, 7 were male and 8 were female. Salvianolate of 200 mg was given to the patients in the trial group intravenously. Hemodynamic parameters, blood gas analysis results, recovery of heartbeat, the dosage of dopamine used, and assisted ventilation time were recorded for both groups before aorta clamping, 2 h, 8 h, and 24 h after aorta declamping. Besides, ICU detention time, the amount of urine in 24 hours, and the amount of drainage in 24 hours after operation were also recorded. Blood samples were taken to determine serum cardial troponin I(cTnI), creatine kinase MB isoenzyme (CK-MB), malondialdehude (MDA), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) in both groups respectively at different times including after the induction of anesthesia, aorta opening, termination of CPB, end of operation, and one day after operation. Results There was no significant difference in hemodynamic parameters, the dosage of dopamine used, spontaneous recovery of heartbeat, and the amount of urine in 24 hours and drainage after operation for 24 hours between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). The rate of ventricular rhythm, blood lactic acid level, the time of assisted ventilation and ICU detention time for the trial group were significantly lower than those for the control group (Plt;0.05), while partial pressure of oxygen in artery(PaO2) was significantly lower in the trial group 8 h after aorta declamping (Plt;0.05). The levels of serum CK-MB, cTnI, and MDA after operation for both groups were higher than those before operation; and those levels for the trial group were significantly lower than the control group at various time points (Plt;0.05). The concentration of SOD decreased after operation in both groups (Plt;0.05), and it was higher in the trial group than the control group at different time points. The decrease of SOD level in the trial group was less than that in the control group. Conclusion Salvianolate can protect myocardium from ischemiareperfusion injury in cardiac valve replacement with CPB effectively, through promoting the activity of antioxidative enzymes and eliminating oxygen free radicals. Patients can be treated with salvianolate for antimyocardial ischemia reperfusion injury.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the effectiveness and safety of salvianolate injection and Danshen injection for patients with angina pectoris, and evaluate the cost of drug. MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, CENTRAL (Issue 4, 2013), CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data (2004.1 to 2013.5) for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the comparison between salvianolate injection and Danshen injection for angina pectoris from January 2004 to May 2013. Relevant journals and conference proceedings were also manually retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assess the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software. ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 1 196 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, salvianolate injection was obviously superior to Danshen injection in the effectiveness (OR=3.79, 95%CI 2.78 to 5.17, P < 0.000 01) and safety (OR=0.24, 95%CI 0.09 to 0.64, P=0.004), but lack of economic advantages in the treatment of the angina pectoris diseases. ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that, salvianolate injection is a safe and effective scheme for angina pectoris, and Danshen injection is considered as a economic method. Because of the limited quantity and quality of currently-available research, the aforementioned conclusion should be verified by strictly-designed and large-scale sample RCTs.