Objective To compare the effectiveness of arthroscopic screw and suture fixations in treatment of anterior cruciate ligament tibial eminence avulsion fractures. Methods Between January 2002 and January 2009, 43 patients with freshanterior cruciate ligament tibial eminence avulsion fracture were treated, which were rated as types II and III according to Meyers- McKeever-Zaricznyj classification. Fractures were fixed with either screw (screw group, n=21) or nonabsorbable suture (suture group, n=22). There was no significant difference in sex, age, disease duration, and fracture type between 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). The range of motion (ROM) and Lysholm score were compared between 2 groups, and the knee stabil ity was evaluated based on the Lachman test and KT-2000 measurement. Results The operation time was 48-60 minutes (mean, 51.6 minutes) in the screw group, and 55-68 minutes (mean, 63.2 minutes) in the suture group, showing significant difference (t=4.645, P=0.032). Incisions healed by first intention and no compl ication occurred in 2 groups. All patients were followed up (5.7 ± 0.6) years in the screw group and (5.3 ± 0.5) years in the suture group. The fracture healed completely in both groups; the heal ing time was (3.3 ± 0.6) months in the screw group and (3.2 ± 0.4) months in the suture group, showing significant difference (t=3.723, P=0.019). Between the screw group and the suture group, no significant difference was found in ROM [(128.6 ± 10.1)° vs. (130.2 ± 14.1)°, P gt; 0.05] and Lysholm score (94.6 ± 14.5 vs. 95.1 ± 17.2, P gt; 0.05). The stabil ities based on KT-2000 measurement were also similar between 2 groups at last follow-up [(0.9 ± 0.3) mm vs. (1.0 ± 0.4) mm, P gt; 0.05]. Lachman test of 2 groups were negative. Conclusion Boththe screw and nonabsorbable suture fixation techniques for anterior cruciate l igament tibial eminence avulsion fracture (type II or III) have good results in terms of functional outcome and stabil ity. However, some patients show flexion contractures of 5° or 10°.
Objective To assess the possibility of placing the posterior pedicle screw on atlas. Methods Twenty human cadaver specimens were used to insert pedicle screws in atlas, through the posterior arch or the pedicle of C1 into the lateral mass. The screw entry point was on the posterior surface of C1 posterior arch and at the intersection of the vertical line through the center of C2 inferior articular process and the horizontal line at least 3 mm below the superior rim of the C1 lamina. The screw of 3.5 mm in diameter was placed in a direction of 10° medial angle and 5° upwardangle. After placement of C1 pedicle screw, the distance from C1 screw entry point to the mediallateral midpoint of C1 pedicle, the maximum length of screw trajectory and the actual screw trajectory angles were measured. The direction of screw penetrating through the cortical of C1 pedicle or lateral mass and the injuries to the vertebral artery and spinal cord were observed.Results Forty pedicle screws were placed on atlas, the mean distance from C1 screw entry point to the medial-lateral midpoint of C1 pedicle was (2.20±0.42)mm, the maximum length of screw trajectory averaged (30.51±1.59)mm, and the actual screw trajectory angle measured (9.7±0.67)° in a medial direction and (4.6±0.59) ° in a upward direction. Only 1 screw penetrated the upper cortical bone of the atlas pedicle because the upward angle was too large, and 8 screws were inserted so deep that the inferior cortical bone of the C1 lateral mass was penetrated. But no injuries to the vertebral artery and spinal cord wereobserved. Conclusion C1 posterior pedicle screw fixation is quite accessible and safe, but the su
Objective?To determine the effectiveness and safety of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment for adult acute nondisplaced scaphoid fractures. Methods?We searched the specialized trials registered in the Cochrane muscle group, The Cochrane Library (CCTR), MEDLINE (1966 to 2007), EMbase (1980 to 2007), PubMed (1966 to 2007), NRR, CCT, and CBMdisc (1979 to July 2007). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedics journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment for adult acute nondisplaced scaphoid fractures were included. The extraction of data and the methodological assessment of included RCTs were performed by two reviewers independently. RevMan software was used to carry out meta-analysis. Results?Five RCTs including 269 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with conservative treatment, the time taken before returning to work or participation in sports was shorter in the surgical treatment group. Because of inadequate extraction data and heterogeneity in the included studies, the results of the time of union and grip strength were not consistent. But all the results showed favorable tendencies. No significant difference was found in wrist motion and complications between the surgical and conservative treatment groups. Conclusion?Compared with conservative treatment for adult acute nondisplaced scaphoid fractures, surgical treatment could decrease the time of returning to work or participation in sports, decrease the time of union, and improve grip strength. But it does not improve the wrist motion or decrease the complications. Because of the small sample size, this conclusion should further tested using well-designed, large scale RCTs.