ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility and safety of spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SpDP), and to discuss the indications and techniques of SpDP. MethodsThe clinical data of seven patients underwent SpDP between January 2004 and December 2007 in Xinhua Hospital were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsOut of the seven cases, one case received the SpDP combined with partial splenic vessel resection, while the other cases received the SpDP with splenic vessel preservation. The operation time was (2.93±0.38) h and the intraoperative blood loss was (392.86±109.65) ml. Only one case suffered from pancreatic fistula, who finally recovered after medicine therapy and percutaneous drainage. There was no other complication or operative mortality. The postoperative platelet count was (273±43.76)×109/L and the postoperative hospital stay was (17.86±8.07) d. For six cases of patients, no recurrence and metastasis was found after the followup (49.2±14.4) months （30-72 months）. ConclusionSpDP is a safe and feasible procedure, which is worthy for selected cases such as benign neoplasm of the body and tail of the pancreas.
ObjectiveTo summarize the treatment effects and success rate of spleen-preserving treatments for patients with splenic injury, and to explore the ideal spleen-preserving treatment for different types of splenic injury. MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 136 patients with splenic injury who underwent spleen-preserving treatment in the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery between July 1998 and December 2010. And the treatment effects of different combined treatment methods were compared and studied. ResultsTwenty-seven patients were treated without surgery; 23 underwent vascular suture combined with fibrin glue treatment; 26 accepted splenic artery ligation, partial suture and fibrin glue treatment; 20 underwent ultrasonic scalpel partial splenectomy and wound spray fibrin glue treatment; 17 accepted splenic artery ligation and RF hemostatic cutter row spleen resection; and 23 accepted laparoscopic ultrasonic scalpel with partial splenectomy and wound spray fibrin glue treatment. Spleen-preserving succeeded in 131 cases (95.58%) and failed in 5 cases (4.42%) without any deaths. ConclusionsIn the treatment of splenic injury, the success rate of different methods of spleen-preserving is close. The success rate of combined use of several spleen-preserving methods together is higher. Under the principle of "Save lives first, and preserve spleen second", we should carry out individualized treatment plan for the patients based on patients' general condition, the extent and grade of splenic rupture, and medical equipment and technical conditions. For those medical units with good treatment conditions, combined spleen-preserving treatment can be performed.