west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Systematic reivew" 2 results
  • Surgical or Conservative Treatment for Acute Nondisplaced Scaphoid Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review

    Objective?To determine the effectiveness and safety of surgical treatment compared to conservative treatment for adult acute nondisplaced scaphoid fractures. Methods?We searched the specialized trials registered in the Cochrane muscle group, The Cochrane Library (CCTR), MEDLINE (1966 to 2007), EMbase (1980 to 2007), PubMed (1966 to 2007), NRR, CCT, and CBMdisc (1979 to July 2007). We also handsearched some Chinese orthopedics journals. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of surgical treatment versus conservative treatment for adult acute nondisplaced scaphoid fractures were included. The extraction of data and the methodological assessment of included RCTs were performed by two reviewers independently. RevMan software was used to carry out meta-analysis. Results?Five RCTs including 269 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared with conservative treatment, the time taken before returning to work or participation in sports was shorter in the surgical treatment group. Because of inadequate extraction data and heterogeneity in the included studies, the results of the time of union and grip strength were not consistent. But all the results showed favorable tendencies. No significant difference was found in wrist motion and complications between the surgical and conservative treatment groups. Conclusion?Compared with conservative treatment for adult acute nondisplaced scaphoid fractures, surgical treatment could decrease the time of returning to work or participation in sports, decrease the time of union, and improve grip strength. But it does not improve the wrist motion or decrease the complications. Because of the small sample size, this conclusion should further tested using well-designed, large scale RCTs.

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:10 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Science in Progress: Filling in the Blanks with Systematic Reviews

    In 1993 the Cochrane Collaboration, an international non-profit organization aiming at producing, updating and disseminating systematic reviews, was founded. Several years later, in 1999, the Chinese Cochrane centre opened in Chengdu, to provide support to (1) Chinese researchers willing to produce reviews and (2) politicians and practitioners willing to start using the results in daily practice. We searched PubMed and the database of the Chinese Cochrane Centre to retrieve data on the overall number of articles and reviews produced in the Chinese language for the period 1990 to 2006. Although the number of reviews increased substantially since the year 2000, the percentage of reviews in the overall number of articles indexed in PubMed remains modest.

    Release date:2016-09-07 02:14 Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content