ObjectiveTo investigate the method and effectiveness of transosseous suture in situ technique in repairing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) avulsion injury for the multiple ligament injuries with knee dislocation (MLIKD).MethodsThe clinical data of 27 patients (27 knees) with MLIKD between September 2010 and April 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 21 males and 6 females, with an average age of 42 years (range, 24-60 years). The injury was caused by traffic accident in 9 cases, heavy-weight crushing in 9 cases, sports sprain in 6 cases, falling from height in 3 cases. The interval from injury to operation was 1-19 days (mean,10.8 days). There were 20 cases of femoral avulsion injury of ACL, 7 cases of tibial avulsion injury of ACL, and there were 17 cases of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injuries. According to the Schenck classification, there were 15 cases of KD-Ⅲ-M type, 8 cases of KD-Ⅲ-L type, and 4 cases of KD-Ⅳ type. All patients were positive in the posterior drawer test and Lachman test; 8 cases were degree Ⅲ positive in varus stress test, and 15 cases were degree Ⅲ positive in valgus stress test. The Lysholm score of knee was 27.6±6.5, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score was 25.5±6.2, and the range of motion (ROM) of knee was (45.1±10.2)°. The injured PCL was reconstructed with a single bundle of autologous hamstring tendon. ACL was repaired with double bundle traction by transosseous suture in situ technique. Medial cruciate ligament, lateral cruciate ligament, joint capsule, and other damaged structures were repaired at the same time.ResultsAll incisions healed by first intention. There were 3 cases with joint effusion and 3 cases with incomplete flexion. All patients were followed up 12-36 months (mean, 22 months). The X-ray films showed good stability in all directions. At last follow-up, the anterior and posterior drawer tests were all negative; Lachman test was degreeⅠpositive in 4 cases, valgus stress test was degreeⅠpositive in 3 cases, varus stress test was degreeⅠpositive in 1 case; and all tests were negative in the rest patients. At 1 year after operation, the ROM of knee was (119.3 ±12.6)°, Lysholm score was 87.2±6.3, and IKDC score was 87.9±6.3, showing significant differences when compared with the preoperative scores (P<0.05).ConclusionTransosseous suture in situ technique can be used to repair the ACL avulsion injury for MLIKD, which can significantly improve the stability, mobility and function of the knee joint, and obtain satisfied short-term effectiveness.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the differences of operative outcomes between early surgery and delayed surgery in multiple ligament injury of knee joint (MLIK) patients.MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP databases were searched to collect cohort studies about operative outcomes of different surgery times in MLIK patients from inception to September 23rd, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 8 cohort studies involving 153 early and 90 delayed operatively treated patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with delayed surgery, early surgery received higher Lysholm score (MD=7.52, 95%CI 2.00 to 13.04, P=0.008) and superior IKDC score rate (OR=2.97, 95%CI 1.51 to 5.84, P=0.002). There were no significant differences in Tegner score (MD=–0.08, 95%CI –1.07 to 0.92, P=0.88) and ROM (MD=4.08, 95%CI –2.38 to 10.55, P=0.22) between two groups. The main adverse reactions of MLIK included neurovascular injury, deep venous thrombosis of lower extremities, common peroneal nerve injury, tourniquet paralysis and limited joint activity. Early surgery had a lower incidence of complications than delayed surgery (7.1% vs. 30%).ConclusionThe current evidence shows that early surgery can receive higher Lysholm score and superior IKDC score rate in treatment of MLIK, and have a lower incidence of complications. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.