west china medical publishers
Author
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Author "TANG Qi" 7 results
  • Clinical efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stageⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer

    Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for stage ⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer. Methods From June 2012 to December 2014, 66 patients with stage ⅠB2-ⅡB cervical cancer were selected and treated by PT (cisplatin/ carboplatin and taxol/docetaxel) as neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prior to surgery. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy response and toxicity were collected and analyzed. Results The extinctive condition of tumor by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy: the complete remission rate was 10.6% (7/66), partial remission rate was 59.1% (39/66), and the total effective rate was 69.7%. The main toxicities were myelosuppression (59.1%, 39/66) and gastrointestinal reactions (33.3%, 22/66). The toxicities could be tolerated or relieved by prevention and treatment. The effective rate of chemotherapy for cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma was 72.6%, 33.3% and 0%, respectively, with significant differences among the three types (P<0.05). The effective rate of chemotherapy for high, medium and low differentiated cervical cancer was 100.0%, 77.3% and 55.9%, respectively, with significant differences among the three degrees (P<0.05). Conclusions Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is proved to be a safe and effective complementary treatment for most patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Due to the limitation of sample size, the correlations between therapeutic effect and tumor differentiation degree and between therapeutic effect and pathological type need further study.

    Release date:2017-10-27 11:09 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Aortic aneurysm burden among young adults in China, 1990-2019: Data from Global Burden of Disease Database 2019

    ObjectiveTo provide reference for the formulation of public health policies through exploring the disease burden of aortic aneurysm (AA) in young adults. MethodsFollowing the general analytical strategies used in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study 2019, we analyzed sex-specific mortality rates and years of life lost (YLLs) among young adults AA in China from 1990 to 2019, compared with global and sociodemographic index(SDI) stratified of young adults AA. Joinpoint was used to analyze the time trend of AA burden among young adults men and women in China. To analyze the attributable risk factors of AA burden in young adults and explore its characteristics. ResultsAmong young adults (15-39 years old) in China, the total of AA deaths in 2019 was 657 (95%UI 549-791), an increase of 16.9% compared with 1990. The mortality rate in 2019 was 0.13 per 100 000 person-years (95%UI 0.11-0.16), an increase of 30%. In 2019, a total of 36921 (95%UI 30 865-44 445) YLLs were produced by young adults in China, an increase of 13.21% compared with 1990. The YLLs rate was 7.42 per 100 000 person-years (95%UI 6.2-8.93), an increase of 24.92%. The male YLLs rate was 11.49 per 100 000 population years (95%UI 9.22-14.28), increasing by 35.18%; The female YLLs rate was 3.11 per 100 000 person-years (95%UI 2.36-3.98), a decrease of 3.12%. Both the AA mortality rate and YLLS in male young adults were higher than those in female, and the growth rate from 1990 to 2019 was significantly higher than that in female. ConclusionThe disease burden of AA among young adults in China increased significantly from 1990 to 2019, mainly among males. The time trend of male and female AA YLLs in Chinese young adults was obviously inconsistent. The AA YLLs of Chinese male young adults were positively correlated with economic development and the progress of medical technology, and were in the process of gradual increase. The AA YLLs of Chinese female young adults were much lower than the average level, which was closely related to the low smoking rate.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Selecting future research questions for diabetes in Chinese medicine based on clinical practice guidelines

    ObjectiveTo systematically analyze the distribution of research evidence on diabetes in current clinical practice guidelines of Chinese medicine (CM). MethodsThe PubMed, EMbase, Cochrane Library, CBM, WanFang Data, CNKI, VIP databases and related guideline website were electronically searched to collect clinical practice guidelines for CM in diabetes published before December 2023. We systematically reviewed the distribution of evidence in these guidelines. ResultsThe content of 27 CM guidelines on diabetes mainly covered syndrome differentiation and treatment, specific disease-specific drugs, diet, external therapies, and traditional exercises. The included guidelines used three different levels of evidence grading, with most of the evidence falling into the low-to-moderate level (67.3%). However, guidelines on diabetes-related osteoporosis, diabetic cardiomyopathy, prediabetes, and diabetic peripheral neuropathy had a relatively low proportion of high-level evidence, accounting for only 7.2%, 7.6%, 13.2%, and 13.3% respectively. Only guidelines on diabetic nephropathy provided evidence on the toxicity of Chinese herbal medicine, while other guidelines did not cover this aspect. Acupuncture, Tai Chi, Baduanjin, and other characteristics therapies had varying levels of evidence for different types of complications. Low-level evidence mainly focused on syndrome differentiation and treatment, symptom-based treatment, sign-based treatment, indicator-based treatment, Chinese patent medicine, specific disease-specific formulas, etc., for diabetes and related complications. ConclusionCurrently, topics supported by low/no evidence, new themes, inconsistent content between guidelines, evidence sources for overlapping targets, classical formulas, toxicity of Chinese herbal medicine, and characteristic CM therapies can provide directions for future research on CM in diabetes. We advocate addressing important issues related to diabetes specifically, to improve research value, eliminate unnecessary duplication of studies and resource waste, and promote the healthy development of CM research in the field of diabetes.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Efficacy of Tai Chi on patients with heart failure: a systematic review

    ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of Tai Chi on patients with heart failure.MethodsDatabases including CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, Web of Science, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library (Issue 8, 2016) were searched from inception to August, 2016 to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Tai Chi for heart failure patients. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 689 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the heart failure patients in Tai Chi group had better score of minnesotaliving with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ) (MD=–9.37, 95%CI –13.09 to –5.65, P<0.000 01), longer six minute walk test (6MWT) (MD=40.37, 95%CI 9.48 to 71.27, P=0.01), higher left ventricular ejectionfractions (LVEF) (MD=7.89, 95%CI 3.01 to 12.77, P=0.002) and lower level of BNP (brain natriuretic peptide) (MD=–10.75, 95%CI –13.20 to –8.30, P<0.000 01); however, as to the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) (MD=0.29, 95%CI –1.223 to 1.81, P=0.71), systolic pressure (SBP) (MD=–2.81, 95%CI –8.52 to 2.90, P=0.33) and diastolic pressure (DBP) (MD=0.37, 95%CI –3.73 to 4.48, P=0.86), there were no significant differences between both groups.ConclusionThe current evidence shows that Tai Chi is feasible for patients with heart failure as it has positive effects on life quality, physiological functions. Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, the above conclusion should be validated by more high quality studies.

    Release date:2017-06-16 02:25 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • A scoping review of the core outcome set research in traditional Chinese medicine

    Objective To summarize the current studies of the core outcome set of traditional Chinese medicine (COS-TCM) and analyze their possible problems. Methods The CNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect studies from inception to April 18, 2023. The relevant characteristics of the included studies were extracted, and the development steps, stakeholders, and outcomes of COS-TCM were analyzed. Results A total of 28 COS-TCM studies were included. Two studies, only published systematic reviews without providing more information, were excluded from the analysis. Among the 26 studies for analysis, 25 studies (96.15%) used a mixture of methods to develop COS-TCM. Clinicians (n=25) were the most common participants, followed by methodologists and patients. Fifteen studies (57.69%) reported measures to help patients better participate. Twelve consensus definitions were found in the included studies, of which 14 studies' consensus definitions were divided into three levels:"consensus in", "consensus out", and "no consensus". Among the 14 studies that reported the final COS-TCM results, only 4 studies recommended Chinese medicine characteristic outcomes. For the measurement of outcomes, 14 studies (53.85%) made plans for the selection of tools. Conclusion The current COS-TCM research has made some progress, and the common developing methods are roughly the same as those nationally used. However, there are still some problems, such as inadequate and low-transparency reports, lack of TCM characteristic outcomes, and so on. We suggest that future COS-TCM studies should refer to COS-STAP, COS-STAR, COS-STAD, and other international standards as well as emphasize the advantages of TCM during development and reporting so that it can improve the transparency of developing methods, research quality, and the proportion of TCM characteristics of the final COS.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Quality evaluation of studies on the core outcome set of Chinese medicine

    ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of protocols and reports on the core outcome set of traditional Chinese medicine (COS-TCM), and to provide some evidence for COS-TCM developers to carry out studies and improve the reporting quality and methodological quality during their studies. MethodsLiterature databases in Chinese and English were searched to collect COS-TCM protocols or study reports from inception to April 18, 2023. The Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR), Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development (COS-STAD), and Core Outcome Set-STAndardised Protocol Items (COS-STAP) were used to evaluate their reporting and methodological quality. Additionally, the consistency of studies with both published protocols and results was evaluated. ResultsA total of 14 protocols and 14 reports (involving 23 COS-TCM studies) were included. The evaluation of COS-TCM protocols according to the COS-STAP found that the reporting rates of "Stakeholders" (71.4%) and "Missing data" (42.9%) were relatively low. For the reports of COS-TCM, the evaluation based on the COS-STAD found that the reporting rates of "the population (s) covered by the COS" (35.7%) and "care was taken to avoid ambiguity of language used in the list of outcomes" (28.6%) were relatively low. Based on the COS-STAR, the items with low reporting rates were "Protocol Deviation" (7.1%), "Participants" (21.4%), and "Conflicts of interest" (28.6%). Additionally, the consistency evaluation found that there were inconsistencies between protocols and their results, such as the types of research included in the systematic review, the methods of qualitative research, the way of holding consensus meetings, scoring methods, etc. Moreover, only one study reported protocol deviation and reasons for change. ConclusionCOS-TCM studies need to improve their methodological quality and report transparency. When developing COS-TCM, we should pay attention to the characteristics of TCM while basing on international standards. The quality evaluation guidelines and standards of reporting for COS-TCM study need to be developed in the future.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Effectiveness of arthroscopic autologous iliac bone grafting with double-row elastic fixation for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with massive glenoid bone defect

    Objective To investigate the effectiveness of arthroscopic autologous iliac bone grafting with double-row elastic fixation in treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with massive glenoid bone defects. Methods Between January 2018 and December 2021, 16 male patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with massive glenoid bone defects were treated with arthroscopic autogenous iliac bone grafting and double-row elastic fixation. The patients were 14-29 years old at the time of the first dislocation, with an average age of 18.4 years. The causes of the first dislocation included falling injury in 5 cases and sports injury in 11 cases. The shoulders dislocated 4-15 times, with an average of 8.3 times. The patients were 17-37 years old at the time of admission, with an average age of 25.1 years. There were 5 left shoulders and 11 right shoulders. The preoperative instability severity index (ISIS) score of the shoulder joint was 5.8±2.1, and the Beighton score was 4.3±2.6. The University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) score, Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Rowe score were used to evaluate shoulder function, and the degree of the glenoid bone defect repair was observed based on CT after operation. Results All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as incision infection or neurovascular injury occurred. The patients were followed up 12 months. At 12 months after operation, UCLA score, Constant score, ASES score, and Rowe score all significantly improved when compared with the scores before operation (P<0.05). CT imaging showed the degree of glenoid bone defect was significantly smaller at immediate, 6 and 12 months after operation when compared with that before operation (P<0.05), and the bone blocks healed with the scapula, and bone fusion had occurred at 12 months. ConclusionArthroscopic autologous iliac bone grafting with double-row elastic fixation is a safe treatment for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation combined with massive glenoid bone defects, with good short-term effectiveness.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content