ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application of comprehensive stroke units in treating patients of hemorrhagic stroke after craniotomy. MethodsWe randomly divided the 288 postoperative patients with hemorrhagic stroke treated from January 2010 to December 2013 into two groups:stroke unit group and conventional treatment group. Then we observed and compared their clinical indicators after they received different therapeutic regimens. ResultsDifferences in the national Institude of Health Stroke Scale (4.6±3.2 vs. 7.3±4.1), activities of daily living (89.3±15.6 vs. 72.5±20.3), and duration of hospital stays[(23.3±5.2) vs. (32.5±8.3) days] were significant (P<0.05) on discharge day. The infection rate during hospitalization, the scores of Glasgow outcome scale three months after leaving hospital between the stroke unit group and the conventional treatment group were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no remarkable difference in the average cost of hospitalization between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComprehensive stroke unit treatment can significantly reduce the disability rate for postoperative patients with hemorrhagic stroke, shorten the average length of stay at the hospital, save the health care resources, and improve the patients' ability to return to society as well as the satisfaction of family members.
ObjectiveTo explore the comprehensive hospital administrative management system for urban and rural cooperation in the process of medical reform. MethodsBy reviewing literature and interviewing directors of the administrative departments and hospital medical staff, we gradually established and improved the administrative management system for urban and rural hospital counterpart support. ResultsBetween 2010 and 2013, 123 medical workers were dispatched to support eight county-level hospitals, after which the comprehensive capacity, and technology and quality control in those hospitals were largely improved. Till the end of 2013, two of those hospitals were promoted to be grade-three class-B comprehensive hospitals; two were promoted as grade-two class-A comprehensive hospitals; three passed the reassessment to be grade-two class-A comprehensive hospitals; and another three county-level medical centers were promoted to be city-level key disciplines. ConclusionThe comprehensive administrative management system improves the management level of grass-roots hospitals at the county level; promotes the social public welfare of tertiary public hospital counterpart support; facilitates the process of medical system reform at the county level; establishes a series of administrative management modes such as unified support, personnel management, assessment standards and evaluation system; and promotes the sustainability of long-term counterpart support system.