Objective To summarize the classic and latest treatment techniques for localized knee cartilage lesions in clinical practice and create a new comprehensive clinical decision-making process. Methods The advantages and limitations of various treatment methods for localized knee cartilage lesions were summarized by extensive review of relevant literature at home and abroad in recent years. Results Currently, there are various surgical methods for treating localized knee cartilage injuries in clinical practice, each with its own pros and cons. For patients with cartilage injuries less than 2 cm2 and 2-4 cm2 with bone loss are recommended to undergo osteochondral autograft (OAT) and osteochondral allograft (OCA) surgeries. For patients with cartilage injuries less than 2 cm2 and 2-4 cm2 without bone loss had treatment options including bone marrow-based techniques (micro-fracture and ogous matrix induced chondrogenesis), autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI)/matrix-induced ACI, particulated juvenile allograft cartilage (PJAC), OAT, and OCA. For patients with cartilage injuries larger than 4 cm2 with bone loss were recommended to undergo OCA. For patients with cartilage injuries larger than 4 cm2 without bone loss, treatment options included ACI/matrix-induced ACI, OAT, and PJAC. Conclusion There are many treatment techniques available for localized knee cartilage lesions. Treatment strategy selection should be based on the size and location of the lesion, the extent of involvement of the subchondral bone, and the level of evidence supporting each technique in the literature.
ObjectiveTo summarize the expression and role of CD146 in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).MethodsThe literature related to CD146 at home and abroad were extensively consulted, and the CD146 expression in MSCs and its function were summarized and analyzed.ResultsCD146 is a transmembrane protein that mediates the adhesion of cells to cells and extracellular matrix, and is expressed on the surface of various MSCs. More and more studies have shown that CD146+ MSCs have superior cell properties such as greater proliferation, differentiation, migration, and immune regulation abilities than CD146- or unsorted MSCs, and the application of CD146+ MSCs in the treatment of specific diseases has also achieved better results. CD146 is also involved in mediating a variety of cellular signaling pathways, but whether it plays the same role in MSCs remains to be demonstrated by further experiments.ConclusionThe utilization of CD146+ MSCs for tissue regeneration will be conducive to improving the therapeutic effect of MSCs.