west china medical publishers
Keyword
  • Title
  • Author
  • Keyword
  • Abstract
Advance search
Advance search

Search

find Keyword "Totally thoracoscopic" 6 results
  • Totally Thoracoscopic Surgery Versus Median Sternal Incision in Intracardiac Surgery in Pediatrics

    Abstract: Objective To find out goodness and weakness by comparing totally thoracoscopic surgery (TTS)and median sternotomy (MS)with cardiopulmonary bypass for pediatric open heart operation. Methods One hundred and fortyseven patients with ventricular septal defect(VSD) and atrial septal defect(ASD) were randomly divided into two groups according to operative methods, TTS group: patients were operated by totally thoracoscopy; MS group: patients were operated by median sternotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass. The clinical records from two groups were compared on operative effect, complications, hospitalization, ventilation time,variations of main data of blood routine test, drainage of pleura cavity, blood loss and transfusion, and pulmonary function. Results There were no death in two groups. There was VSD residual leak the same day after operation which was cured by TTS in one patient of TTS group. There was one case which bleeding was stopped by second operation in MS group. Followup visit were made to 41 patients for 3 months, no heart murmur was detected. The ultrasonic cardiography (UCG) showed that correcting of VSD and ASD were good and had no residual leak. The hospitalization,aortic clampping time, ventilation time and variations of main data of blood routine test, drainage of pleura cavity, blood transfusion and blood loss in TTS group had no significant difference to those in MS group (Pgt;0.05). Operating times was longer in TTS group than that in MS group, while stays in the intensive care unit were shorter in TTS group than that in MS group (Plt;0.01). Preoperative and 3 months postoperative pulmonary function of both teams had no statistically significant difference in two groups (Pgt;0.05). Conclusion TTS is a safe and effective method to pediatric VSD and ASD as MS is.

    Release date:2016-08-30 06:16 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Totally Thoracoscopic Surgery versus Median Sternotomy in Cardiac Myxoma Treatment

    ObjectiveTo examine the differences between totally thoracoscopic surgery and median sternotomy in scope of trauma, postoperative recovery and postoperative complications. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 331 patients with cardiac myxoma in our hospital between January 2001 and November 2015. The patients were devided into 2 groups by the different methods of operation:a totally thoracoscopic surgery group including 196 patients with 71 males and 125 females at a mean age of 50 (42.00-57.50) years, and a median sternotomy group including 135 patients, with 53 males and 82 females at a mean age of 52 (38.00-61.00) years. The clinical records of the two groups were compared in scope of trauma, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications. ResultsThere was shorter time in breathing machine and ICU time (P<0.001), and fewer volume in blood transfusion, blood loss (P<0.001) in the totally thoracoscopic surgery group. There was less pain and postoperative complications (P<0.001) in the totally thoracoscopic surgery group. The aortic clamp time in the totally thoracoscopic surgery group was not significantly different compared with that in the median sternotomy group (P=0.15) While cardiopulmonary bypass time was shorter in the median sternotomy group (P<0.001). ConclusionTotally thoracoscopic surgery is a safe and reliable method in treating cardiac myxoma. Our results suggest that totally thoracoscopic surgery has the advantage of fewer blood loss, blood transfusion, and postoperative complications compared with median sternotomy surgery. Totally thoracoscopic surgery leads to earlier recovery and less pain.

    Release date:2016-12-06 05:27 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Clinical research on radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation with mitral valve replacement under totally thoracoscopic surgery

    ObjectiveTo investigate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation with mitral valve replacement under totally thoracoscopic surgery.MethodsThe clinical data of 107 patients with rheumatic mitral disease and atrial fibrillation who underwent mitral valve replacement and radiofrequency ablation at the same time in our hospital from January 2014 to October 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups: a totally thoracoscopic surgery group (n=51, including 20 males and 31 females, aged 50.57±5.24 years) and a median sternotomy group (n=56, including 21 males and 35 females, aged 52.12±5.59 years) according to the surgical methods. The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data of the patients were compared.ResultsAll operations were successfully completed without death. In terms of bleeding volume, drainage volume, ventilator-assisted breathing time, hospital stay and incision length, the totally thoracoscopic surgery group was better than the median sternotomy group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The cardiopulmonary bypass time and radiofrequency ablation time in the totally thoracoscopic surgery group were longer than those in the median sternotomy group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the operation time, aortic occlusion time, postoperative complications, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial diameter and sinus rhythm maintenance between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no atrioventricular block, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrioesophageal fistula, coronary artery injury, stroke or hemorrhage during the follow-up.ConclusionRadiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation with mitral valve replacement under totally thoracoscopic surgery is safe and effective, and it is worthy of clinical application.

    Release date:2020-07-30 02:32 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Perioperative outcomes of mitral valvuloplasty via totally thoracoscopic approach versus traditional median sternotomy

    ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of mitral valvuloplasty via minimally invasive approach with those of mitral valvuloplasty via traditional median sternotomy.MethodsA total of 1 221 patients undergoing mitral valvuloplasty from January 2015 to August 2018 in Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital were analyzed retrospectively, including 721 males and 500 females, with an average age of 47.2±15.1 years. According to the different surgical methods, they were divided into a study group (n=654), who received mitral valvuloplasty via the totally thoracoscopic approach, and a control group (n=567), who received mitral valvuloplasty via traditional median sternotomy. Clinical data, surgical results, and perioperative outcomes of the two groups were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in preoperative general data between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the study group had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time (146.7±42.4 min vs. 122.7±30.6 min, 96.2±32.7 min vs. 78.3±23.8 min, both P=0.000), and shorter total operation time (227.4±55.3 min vs. 238.1±56.4 min, P=0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of secondary cross-clamping and mitral valve replacement between the two groups (3.7% vs. 2.6%, P=0.312; 1.7% vs. 1.4%, P=0.690). The blood transfusion rate and the incidence of respiratory tract infection and postoperative poor wound healing were lower (13.0% vs. 24.5%, 2.1% vs. 18.0%, 1.5% vs. 5.3%, all P=0.000) and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter (6.2±4.4 d vs. 11.5±8.8 d, P=0.000) in the study group. There was no significant difference in hospitalization expense between the two groups (95 847.9±31 322.0 yuan vs. 99 673.1±47 930.3 yuan, P=0.149). Within 30 d after surgery, 1 patient died in the study group and 4 patients died in the control group. Before discharge, there were 4 and 5 patients with severe mitral valve regurgitation in the study group and the control group, respectively.ConclusionCompared with mitral valvuloplasty via traditional median sternotomy, minimally invasive mitral valvuloplasty is superior in shortening operation time and postoperative hospital stay, lowering blood transfusion rate, and reducing postoperative complications, which can achieve better clinical outcomes.

    Release date:2020-12-31 03:27 Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Application and development of totally thoracoscopic mitral valve plasty

    Thoracoscopic minimally invasive technology has been used in mitral valve plasty since 1990s. Totally thoracoscopic mitral valve plasty has the advantages of small trauma, beautiful incision and rapid postoperative recovery. It is favored by more and more patients and cardiac surgeons. However, according to the reports, the proportion of totally thoracoscopic mitral valve surgery in China is still low. Mitral valve plasty via the totally thoracoscopic approach is still controversial in terms of population adaptation, perioperative complications and long-term prognosis. In addition, the technical difficulty and the long training cycle of surgeons also limit the popularization of this technology. By summarizing the existing literature, this paper analyzes the application and development of totally thoracoscopic approach in comparison with the traditional median thoracotomy mitral valve plasty.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
  • Analysis of the effect of totally thoracoscopic versus thoracoscopic-assisted minimally invasive small incision surgery in left atrial appendage clipping

    ObjectiveTo compare the surgical effects of totally thoracoscopic and thoracoscopic-assisted small incision for left atrial appendage clipping. Methods The clinical data of patients who underwent left atrial appendage clipping surgery via totally thoracoscopy or thoracoscopic-assisted minimally invasive small incision from November 2018 to March 2022 in Beijing Tiantan Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the surgical approach, they were divided into a totally thoracoscopic group and a small incision group. The clinical results were compared between the two groups. ResultsA totoal of 41 patients were enrolled, including 30 males and 11 females, with an average age of 66.6±6.1 years. There were 23 patients in the totally thoracoscopic group and 18 patients in the small incision group. The CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.5±1.1 points, and HAS-BLED score was 3.7±1.5 points. No death occured in the whole group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of operation time, chest complications, successful rate of closure of the left atrial appendage, residual length of the left atrial appendage, or displacement of the atrial appendage clip (P>0.05). The total drainage volume in the totally thoracoscopic group was less than that in the small incision group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.031). The median follow-up time was 10 (1-30) months, during which there was 1 patient of stroke and 1 patient of left atrial thrombus in both groups. ConclusionTotally thoracoscopic left atrial appendage clipping is less invasive than thoracoscopic-assisted minimally invasive small incision surgery and does not increase the risk of surgical complications.

    Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
1 pages Previous 1 Next

Format

Content