Abstract： Objective To investigate the clinical application of tubular stomach in cervical esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Methods A total of 850 patients with esophageal cancer who underwent esophagectomy through cervico-thoraco-abdominal（3-field）approach between January 2007 and January 2009 in North Jiangsu Hospital were allocated into the tubular stomach group（group A, n=425） and the whole stomach group （group B, n=425）by operation order. Group A included 287 male and 138 female patients with their average age of 58.2±11.5 years. Among them, 27 patients had upper esophageal cancer, 346 patients had middle esophageal cancer and 52 patients had lower esophageal cancer. Group B included 298 male and 127 female patients with their average age of 58.5±12.8 years. Among them, 33 patients had upper esophageal cancer, 338 patients had middle esophageal cancer, and 54 patients had lower esophageal cancer. Operation time, postoperative length of hospital stay and the incidence of anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture, intra-thoracic stomach syndrome and reflux esophagitis of the two groups were compared. Results All the patients recovered uneventfully with no in-hospital death. There was no statistical difference in operation time （175.0±12.8 min vs.171.0±10.5 min，t=1.702，P＞ 0.05）and postoperative length of hospital stay （16.0±8.5 d vs.16.3±8.8 d，t=1.773，P＞ 0.05） between the two groups. During follow-up of six months, the rates of anastomotic leakage（χ2=5.550，P＜ 0.05）, intra-thoracic stomach syndrome （χ2=10.500，P＜ 0.05）and reflux esophagitis（χ2=9.150，P＜ 0.05） of group A were significantly lower than those of group B. There was no significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic stricture （χ2=0.120，P＞ 0.05） between the two groups. Conclusion Tubular stomach is better than whole stomach for cervical esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer since it is more physiologically and anatomically complied. It can decrease the incidence of anastomotic leakage, intra-thoracic stomach syndrome, reflux esophagitis and improve the postoperative quality of life.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical outcomes between triluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach and traditional esophagectomy for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma (EC)in elderly patients. MethodsA total of 196 elderly patients (>60 years)with EC who received esophagectomy in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital from January 2007 to January 2013 were enrolled in this study. According to different surgical methods, all the patients were divided into triluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach group (group A)and traditional esophagectomy group (group B). There were 96 patients including 51 males and 45 females in group A with their age of 60-81 (66.21±7.32)years, and 100 patients including 54 males and 46 females in group B with their age of 60-82 (65.43±6.37)years. Clinical indexes were compared between the 2 groups. ResultsRadical esophagectomy was successfully performed for all the patients. There was no statistical difference in operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative incidence of chylothorax, recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis, anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stricture or mortality between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). Time to first passage of flatus and postoperative length of hospital stay of group A were significantly shorter than those of group B, and the incidences of postoperative arrhythmias, pulmonary complications and thoracic-stomach syndrome of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P < 0.05). ConclusionTriluminal-tube feeding combined with tubular stomach can significantly reduce postoperative morbidity, shorten hospital stay and improve quality of life of elderly patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Objective To compare the outcome of tubular stomach and cervical esophagus laminated anastomosis and mechanical anastomosis. Methods A total of 128 patients with middle and upper esophageal cancer in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2016 were randomly divided into two groups, 64 patients in each group and all patients underwent esophagectomy. In the group A, there were 46 males and 18 females with age of 40–75 years, treated with tubular stomach and cervical esophagus layered anastomosis. There were 51 males and 13 females with age of 43–71 years in the group B receiving mechanical anastomosis. We observed the short-term and long-term efficacy as well as complications. Results In the group A, there was cervical anastomotic fistula in 1 patient, anastomotic stenosis in 2 patients and reflux esophagitis in 12 patients. In the group B, 1 patient suffered chylothorax, 8 patients cervical anastomotic fistula, 4 patients anastomotic stenosis and 14 patients reflux esophagitis. Conclusion Layered anastomosis can effectively reduce the incidence of anastomotic fistula and stenosis. Tubular stomach can effectively prevent and reduce the reflux esophagitis, and the high long-term quality of life will be achieved after the operation.