Objective To investigate the value of tumor type M2 pyruvate kinase ( M2-PK) in the differential diagnosis of pleural effusion. Methods A total of 146 patients with pleural effusion during January 2006 to December 2008 were recruited at the department of respiratory medicine of the Shantou Affiliated Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen Medical College. Pleural effusion was malignant in 72 cases ( 52 cases with lung cancer and 20 cases with metastatic lung cancer) and benign in 74 cases ( 54 cases with infective pleural effusion and 20 with transudation effusion) . The patients were divided into a malignant pleural effusion group, an infective pleural effusion group, and a transudation group.Then the infective group was further divided into subgroups of tuberculosis pleural effusion group andparapneumonic effusion group. The concentration of tumor M2-PK in pleural fluid obtained during the first thoracocentesis was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay( ELISA) . Results The concentration of tumor M2-PK was significantly higher in the malignant pleural effusion group compared with the benignpleural effusion groups ( P lt; 0. 01) . Significant differences were also found in the concentration of tumor M2-PK between malignant pleural effusion caused by lung cancer and metastatic lung cancer( P lt; 0. 05) .When the cutoff value of tumor M2-PK was set at 18. 68 U/mL, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion was 87. 6% , 86. 0% , and 87. 4%, respectively. Furthermore,the detection of tumor M2-PK in combination with CEA showed better diagnostic sensitivity( 96. 0% ) ,specificity ( 85. 0% ) , and accuracy ( 91. 1% ) . Conclusions The detection of tumor M2-PK in pleural effusion is of some clinical significance in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant pleural effusion.The detection of tumor M2-PK in combination with CEA is a good diagnostic tool with high sensitivity andspecificity.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum pro-gastrin-releasing peptide (Pro-GRP) in patients with small cell lung cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and other databases (1966 to Sept 2009) to collect studies which evaluated the diagnostic value of Pro-GRP in patients with small cell lung cancer. The heterogeneity of the included studies was tested by the Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2. The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve and meta-analyses were performed by MetaDisc. Results A total of 256 relevant articles were retrieved and 19 were included in our review. Eleven studies involving 1 447 patients were included. Meta-analyses showed that the heterogeneity among studies was high (P﹤0.000 01, I2=69.3%), the pooled sensitivity was 0.717 and the pooled specificity was 0.963. Subgroup analyses indicated that 9 of the studies which used the LD (Limited diseases) SCLC group (P=0.003, I2=65.5%, SEN=0.637, SPE=0.968, SROC AUC=0.724 3) had heterogeneity and ED (Extensive diseases) SCLC group (P=0.2, I2=27.0%, SEN=0.766, SPE=0.968, SROC AUC=0.935 5) had no heterogeneity. And 15 of the studies of Pro-GRP which were determined by acmmercial sandwich ELISA (Japan) group (P=0.000 1, I2=68.5%) had heterogeneity. Three of the studies of Pro-GRP which were determined by ELISA (Germany) group (P=0.948 7, I2=0.001%) had no heterogeneity. Conclusion Pro-GRP could be regarded as one of the reference tests in patients with small cell lung cancer, but higher quality trials are required.
Objective To evaluate diagnostic value of tumor marker — the serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) in patients with suspected small cell lung cancer with lung pathological diagnosis as the gold standard. Methods A search in The Cochrane Library, PubMed, OVID, MEDLINE, EMbase, Cancerlit, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and CBM, was conducted from 1966 to 2008. Hand searches and additional searches were also conducted. Criteria for inclusion were established based on validity criteria for diagnostic research published by the Cochrane Methods Group on Screening and Diagnostic Tests. Subsequently, the characteristics of the included articles were appraised and extracted. Statistical analysis was performed employing Revman 4.2 software. Heterogeneity of the included articles was tested, which was used to select the proper effect model to calculate pooled weighted sensitivity and specificity. The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve was performed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Finally, sensitivity analysis was performed. Results Six articles entered this meta-analysis: four English articles, one Japanese article and one Chinese article. The quality level of the articles was C. the studies involving 2,366 patients (579 SCLC and 1,847 NSCLC patients that were diagnosed by using the gold standard) were included. The meta-analysis reported that the heterogeneity among studies was high (P=0.005, I2=70.4%), pooled sensitivity was 0.59, 95%CI 0.55 to 0.64, and pooled specificity was 0.88, 95%CI 0.87 to 0.90. The likelihood ratio was 8.17 and 0.31, respectively. The summary ROC of the meta-disc software and the area under the curve was 0.905 0. These data suggested that NSE had a relatively high false negative rate (41%) and a relatively low false positive rate (12%). Conclusion The tumor marker NSE is has diagnostic value of small cell lung cancer, but more high quality trials are required.
Objective To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum neuron specific enolase (NSE) in patients with small cell lung cancer. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and other databases (1966 to March 2007) to collect studies which evaluated the diagnostic value of NSE in patients with small cell lung cancer. The heterogeneity of included studies was tested by the Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2. The Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve and meta-analyses were performed by MetaDisc. Results Fifteen studies involving 4221 patients (672 SCLC and 3549 NSCLC patients, all diagnosed by the gold standard) were included. Meta-analyses showed that the heterogeneity among studies was high (P=0.000 2, I2=66.1%), the pooled sensitivity was 0.67 (95%CI 0.64 to 0.71) and the pooled specificity was 0.91 (95%CI 0.90 to 0.92). Subgroup analyses indicated that 4 of the studies which used the reagent supplied by The Academy of Military Medical Sciences (P=0.33, I2=13.4%, AUC= 0.9672, SE=0.0393) and another 4 which used the reagent supplied by Roche (P=0.23, I2=29.9%, AUC=0.8311, SE=0.0836) had no heterogeneity. Conclusion NSE could be regarded as one of the reference tests in patients with small cell lung cancer, but more high quality trials are required.
Objective To study the usefulness of combined detection of 4 tumor markers in patients with recrudescent and metastatic breast cancer. Methods The serum levels of CA153, CEA, TPS and CA125 were determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay. A total of 1245 subjects entered the study. Sensitivities of the tests were evaluated in 1 000 patients with breast cancer (102 preoperative patients and 898 postoperative patients) and 245 with benign breast disease. Results The serum levels of CA153, CEA and TPS were significantly elevated in preoperative patients compared with metastatic patients (Plt;0.001). The serum levels of CA153, CEA, TPS and CA125 were significantly elevated in metastatic patients compared with non-metastatic patients (Plt;0.001). The sensitivity of the 4 tumor markers were significantly elevated in metastatic patients compared with preoperative and postoperative non-metastatic patients (Plt;0.05). The sensitivity of combined detection of the 4 tumor markers were 56.72% and 94.68% in preoperative patients and metastatic patients, respectively. The CEA elevation was bly correlated with CA153 and TPS levels (all P=0.000 1, r=0.410 and 0.396, respectively). Conclusion Combined detection of the 4 tumor markers may play a guiding role in post-therapeutic monitoring of breast cancer in progressive, recrudescent and metastatic patients.
Objective To summarize the research progress of microRNA （miRNA） as a tumor marker in peripheral blood. Methods The domestic and international published literatures about circulating miRNA as a tumor marker in recent years were reviewed. Results The miRNA expression has universality，stability and specificity，and it is related to the occurrence and development of viarous diseases. Conclusion Circulating miRNA shows a broad application prospect in clinical diagnosis， treatment， and prognosis of tumor and other diseases.
Objective To summarize the domestic and abroad articles related to the research on the relation between microRNA （miRNA） and pancreatic cancer，and explore the important effects of miRNA expression patterns in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Methods “microRNA and pancreatic cancer” were searched as key words by PubMed and CNKI series full-text database retrieval systems from 2000 to 2012. Totally 60 English papers and 15 Chinese papers were obtained. Choice criteria：the basic research of miRNA and pancreatic cancer，the clinical research of miRNA and pancreatic cancer， and the prospect of miRNA in pancreatic cancer diagnosis and treatment. According to the choice criteria，31 papers were finally analyzed. Results The miRNA expression spectrum and specific miRNA expression such as miR-21，miR-34，miR-217，miR-196a，miR-10a，miR-155，miR-221，miR-222，miR-181a，miR-181b，miR-181d， and the family members of miR-200 and let-7 might be used as tumor markers to differentiate pancreatic cancer from normal pancreas，chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic endocrine tumors，and might be used as prognostic factor to predict the outcome. Conclusions miRNA expression spectrum are not only related to diagnosis of pancreatic cancer， but also have provided a new research direction and method for gene therapy of pancreatic cancer．
ObjectiveTo explore the values of CA19-9, CA242, CEA, and CA125 single or combined detection on clinical diagnosis and prognosis for patients with pancreatic cancer. MethodsSerum tumor markers CA199, CA242, CEA, and CA125 of 63 patients with pancreatic cancer, 33 patients with cancer of bile duct, and 27 patients with benign pancreatic disease were detected, and those patients were followed up after operation. ResultsThe levels of CA19-9, CA242, CEA, and CA125 in patients with pancreatic cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with benign pancreatic disease and cancer of bile duct (Plt;0.05). The sensitivity of CA19-9 alone was the highest in the four tumor markers for the patients with pancreatic cancer 〔79.4% (50/63)〕, but the specificity (61.9%) was lower than that of CA242 (83.3%) and CEA (80.0%). The specificity of combined detection of CA199+CA242+CEA was the highest 〔93.3% (56/60)〕. The level of CA19-9 in carcinoma of body/tail of pancreas was significantly higher than that of carcinoma of pancreas head or whole pancreas (Plt;0.05). The serum levels of CA19-9 and CA242 in patients with stage Ⅳ were significantly higher than those in stage Ⅰ or Ⅱ/Ⅲ (Plt;0.05). Fifteen patients were lost to follow up, 48 patients were followed up 2－12 months with an average 6 months. The levels of CA242 and CA199 in patients with pancreatic cancer on 0.5 month and 3 months after operation were lower than those before operation (Plt;0.05). ConclusionsSingle detection of CA19-9 can improve the diagnostic sensitivity, and combined detection of tumor markers CA199+CA242+CEA can improve the diagnostic specificity. CA19-9 or CA242 is a valuable marker for evaluating treatment effects and estimating prognosis.
To study the expressions of CA19-9 and CA125 and their clinicopathologic significancesin gallbladder adenocarcinoma , pericancerous tissues and chronic cholecystitis. Methods EnVisionTM immunohistochemist ry was used for assaying the expressive levels of CA1929 and CA125 in the routinely paraffin2embedded sections of specimens f rom gallbladder adenocarcinoma ( n = 108) , pericancerous tissues ( n = 46) , and chronic cholecystitis ( n = 35) . Results The positive rates of CA19-9 and CA125 were significantly higher in gallbladder adenocarcinoma ( 49. 1 % , 51. 9 %) than those in pericancerous tissues ( 26. 1 % , 15. 2 %) and chronic cholecystitis(14. 3 % , 5. 7 %) , respectively ( Plt; 0. 01) . The positive rates of CA19-9 and CA125 were significantly lower in thecases of adenomatous canceration , maximal diameter lt; 2 cm , no-metastasis of lymph node and no-invasion of regional tissues than those in the ones of low-differentiated adenocarcinoma , maximal diameter ≥2 cm , metastasis oflymph node and invasion of regional tissues ( Plt; 0. 05 , Plt; 0. 01 ) . The consistence of CA19-9 and CA125 expressivelevels was found in gallbladder adenocarcinoma (χ2 = 44. 69 , Plt; 0. 01) . Conclusion The expressions of CA19-9 andCA125 may be important tumor markers to reflect the carcinogenesis , progression , biological behaviors and prognosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma.
Objective The article introduces the present status of the application of comparative proteomics in study of tumor marker. Methods This essay review the present status and advances of the application of comparative proteomics in study of tumor marker through refer considerable literatures about proteome, proteomics and tumor marker. Results Follow the study of human genome deepening; the paradox between the finiteness of genes’ number and stability of genes’ structure and the variety of the life phenomena is more conspicuous. Then, the study of proteomics was pushed to the advancing front of life science research. The application of comparative proteomics to tumor research becomes a hot spot nowadays. Conclusion Screening tumor marker via comparative proteomics is an extremely promising research.