ObjectiveTo summarize the diagnosis and management of intravenous leiomyomatosis, and to compare effect of the one-stage surgery and two-stage surgery. MethodsClinicopathological data of 18 patients hospitalized in Peking Union Medical College Hospital who were diagnosed as intravenous leiomyomatosis with intracaval and intracardiac extension during Jan. 2002 to Sep. 2013 were collected, and some indexes of the one-stage surgery group and two-stage surgery group were compared, including blood loss, blood transfusion, operation time, period of stay in ICU, hospital stay, and hospitalization expense. ResultsAll the patients were diagnosed as intravenous leiomyomatosis pathologically after operation. Of the 18 patients, 6 (33.3%) patients underwent one-stage surgery and 12 (66.7%) patients underwent two-stage surgery. There were no significant difference on blood loss, blood transfusion, operation time, period of stay in ICU, hospital stay, and hospitalization expense (P > 0.05). There were some patients suffered from complication, including 1 case of pleural effusion, 1 case of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, 1 case of pulmonary infection in one-stage surgery group; 1 cases of arrhythmia, 2 cases of intestinal obstruction, 2 cases of pleural effusion in two-stage surgery group. No significance had be found in incidence rate of complication between one-stage surgery group and two-stage surgery group (P=1.000). Tumors of 2 patients who underwent two-stage surgery had developed before the second surgery, increasing the difficulty and risk of the second surgery. Three cases of one-stage group were followed-up for 48-63 month (the median time was 62.0 months), 10 cases in two-stage group were followed-up for 1-43 month (the median time was 19.5 months). During the followed-up period, occurrence happened in 1 case of two-stage group, but without death in all cases. ConclusionsBoth one-stage surgery and two-stage surgery are effective and safe. Taking physical and psychological endurance of patients into consideration, one-stage surgery is highly recommended if the patient is in good status and can tolerate the strike brought by the surgery.
Objective To summarize the clinical characteristics of laparoscopic unexpected gallbladder cancer (UGC), and to explore the impact of TNM stage and secondary surgery timing on postoperative survival. Methods Clinical data of 70 UGC patients who treated in Xianyang Hospital of Yanan University and The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University from January 2008 to January 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. The influencing of TNM staging and secondary surgery timing on the prognosis of UGC patients were analyzed by single factor analysis. Results Of the 70 patients before operation, 68 patients (97.2%) were diagnosed as calculus of gallbladder, 1 patient (1.4%) was diagnosed as gallbladder polyps, 1 patient (1.4%) was diagnosed as intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile duct stone. TNM staging: 2 patients (2.9%) in stage 0, 9 patients (12.9%) in stage Ⅰ, 50 patients (71.4%) in stage Ⅱ, 6 patients (8.6%) in stage Ⅲa, 1 patient (1.4%) in stage Ⅲb, 1 patient (1.4%) in stage Ⅳa, and 1 patient (1.4%) in stage Ⅳb. Fifty-five patients (78.6%) were confirmed by intraoperative frozen section examination, and 15 patients (21.4%) were confirmed after laparoscopic surgery. There were 66 patients were followed-up for 2-79 months, and the median follow-up time was 28-month, the 1-， 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 92.3%, 70.7%, and 53.7% respectively. The survival curves of stage 0, Ⅰ, Ⅱ, and Ⅲ+Ⅳ were differed significantly (P ＜0.01), the survival situation was best in patients in stage 0 and Ⅰ, but worst in patients in stage Ⅲ+Ⅳ. There was no statistical difference between the prognosis of patients underwent one-stage surgery and those underwent two-stage surgery (P=0.73). Conclusions A large proportion of UGC are in stage Ⅱ. For UGC patients, the prognosis is related with the clinical stage, so the surgical approach does not worsen the prognosis, regardless whether the tumor is detected during or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.