ObjectivesTo investigate the diagnostic value of different diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) models between two Gaussian DWI models including mono-exponential and bi-exponential, and the non-Gaussian kurtosis model in poorly differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.MethodsSubjects comprised 52 patients with poorly differentiated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma which had been confirmed by surgery. All patients underwent DWI (1.5T, multi-b values: 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, 500, 800, 1000, 1 500, 2 000s/mm2). Mean values of DWI-derived metrics ADCstandard, ADCslow, ADCfast, f, MD, MK and ADCstandard were calculated from regions of interest in all tumours and non-tumorous parenchyma and compared. ANOVA and Mann Whitney U test was used to compare the MRI paremeters. ROC was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency.ResultsMean ADCstandard, ADCfast, f and MK values showed significant differences between tumours and non-tumorous parenchyma (P<0.05). AUC for ADCstandard, MD, ADCfast and f were 0.705, 0.665, 0.648, 0.614, respectively. The ROC curve integrated with ADCstandard and MD had better diagnostic efficiency (AUC was about 0.754).ConclusionsADCstandard, ADCfast, f and MK values can differentiate tumours from non-tumorous parenchyma. The combination of Gaussion distribution model and non-Gaussion distribution model has the potential to increase the diagnostic accuracy of DWI in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
A team with strong cohesion and high execution is an important guarantee for conducting high-quality and sustainable clinical researches. Combined with the previous literature and the author’s view, this paper summarizes the key points of team building, which include a clear research direction, a balanced composition of team members, an outstanding team leader, the competence enhancement of team members, and a member-oriented management philosophy. Clear research direction is the premise of the existence and development of a team. Multi-level, multi-disciplinary membership can avoid potential conflicts of interest caused by homogeneity, and enable research to be refined and strengthened in interdisciplinary collisions. Team leader is the key to team development. The enhancement of team members’ competence is the cornerstone of team development. Adherence to member-oriented principle can form a true team culture. This paper aims to summarize and analyze the key points of clinical research team construction for peer reference.
The number of investigator initiated research (IIR) is increasing. But the recognition and management of IIR in China is still in its infancy, and there is a lack of specific and operable guidance for the implementation process. Based on our practical experiences, previous literature reports, and current policy regulations, the authors took prospective IIR as an example to summarize the implementation process of IIR into 14 steps, which are as the following: study initiation, ethical review, study registration, study filing, case report form design, database establishment, standard operating procedure making, investigator training, informed consent, data collection, data entry, data verification, data locking and data archiving.