Objective To investigate the risk factors, prevention and therapy of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation. Methods The literatures on the risk factors, prevention and therapy of hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation in recent years were collected and reviewed. Results The risk factors include factor Ⅴ Leiden, metabolic liver diseases of recipients, recipient sex, the use of Roux-en-Y biliary reconstructions, virus infection and so on. The measures of prevention and therapy include early diagnosis, detection of activated protein C resistance, postoperative anti-coagulation therapy, liver arteries reconstructions measures, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, continuous transcatheter arterial thrombolysis, liver retransplantation and so on. Conclusion The study of risk factors, prevention and therapy will promote the process of improving the prognosis of patients with liver transplantation.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of 3D laparoscopic in the treatment of colorectal cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, VIP, WanFang Data and CNKI databases were electronically searched online to collect clinical trials of 3D laparoscopic in the treatment of colorectal cancer from inception to September 1st, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 26 trials, including 4 randomized controlled trials and 22 cohort studies were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with 2D laparoscopic, 3D laparoscopic had shorter operative time (MD=–16.32, 95%CI –22.61 to –10.03, P<0.000 01), less amount of blood transfusion in operation (MD=–10.80, 95%CI –19.93 to –1.66, P=0.02), more lymph node dissection (MD=0.88, 95%CI 0.30 to 1.45, P=0.003), shorter recovery time of gastrointestinal function (MD=–0.18, 95%CI –0.31 to –0.04, P=0.01), lower incidence of postoperative complication (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.44 to 0.89, P=0.009), and fewer days in hospital (MD=–0.84, 95%CI –1.40 to –0.28, P=0.003). Additionally, there was no significant difference in hospitalization costs (MD=–0.01, 95%CI –0.23 to 0.21, P=0.94).ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that, compared with 2D laparoscopy, 3D laparoscopy assisted colorectal cancer surgery has obvious advantages such as less bleeding during operation, shorter operation time, lower incidence of complications after operation, shorter hospitalization time and no increase in hospitalization expenses. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.