Objective To summarize clinical outcomes of right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt （Sano shunt）as the first stage palliative operation for patients with pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect （PA/VSD）. Methods Between September 2009 and May 2011，17 PA/VSD patients underwent Sano shunt in Fu Wai Hospital. There were 10 male patients and 7 female patients with their median age of 9.7 （2.5-73.8） months and average weight of （8.3±3.4）kg. Preoperative McGoon ratio was 1.04±0.29 and Nakata index was （102.0±56.9） mm2/m2. Five children had severe intrapericardial left pulmonary aretery stenosis，11 patients had patent ductus arteriosus （PDA），and 1 patient had major aorto-pulmonary collateral arteries. Preoperative transcutaneous oxygen saturation （SpO2） was 72.6%±11.6%. Results All the patients received Sano shunt placement successfully. Eleven patients underwent concomitant PDA ligation，and 7 patients underwent concomitant left pulmonary artery plasty. The Sano shunts were constructed with glutaraldehyde-fixed autologous pericardium in 10 patients，fresh autologous pericardium in 1 patient and Gore-Tex graft in 6 patients. All the patients underwent reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract via the right ventricular incision. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time was （75.0±30.0） min. Postoperative SpO2 was 89.8%±5.3% and significantly higher than preoperative SpO2 （P＜0.05）. All the patients were discharged alive and followed up for （12.1±6.7） months. During follow-up，8 patients underwent angiography study whose McGoon ratio and Nakata index improved to 2.05±0.37 and （304.8±51.3） mm2/m2 respectively，both of which were significantly higher than preoperative values（P＜0.05）. Four patients successful underwent second stage total correction. Conclusion Sano shunt is a comparatively safe procedure as the first stage palliative operation for PA/VSD patients，and can significant improve their pulmonary artery growth.
Objective To investigate predictors for mortality among patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection (AAD) and to establish a predictive model to estimate risk of in-hospital mortality. Methods A total of 999 patients with Stanford type A AAD enrolled between 2010 and 2015 in our hospital were included for analysis. There were 745 males and 254 females with a mean age of 49.8±12.0 years. There were 837 patients with acute dissection and 182 patients (18.22%) were preoperatively treated or waiting for surgery in the emergency department and 817 (81.78%) were surgically treated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate predictors of in-hospital mortality. Significant risk factors for in-hospital death were used to develop a prediction model. Results The overall in-hospital mortality was 25.93%. In the multivariable analysis, the following variables were associated with increased in-hospital mortality: increased age (OR=1.04, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05, P<0.000 1), acute aortic dissection (OR=2.49, 95% CI 1.30 to 4.77, P=0.006 1), syncope (OR=2.76, 95% CI 1.15 to 6.60, P=0.022 8), lower limbs numbness/pain (OR=7.99, 95% CI 2.71 to 23.52, P=0.000 2), type Ⅰ DeBakey dissection (OR=1.72, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.80, P=0.030 5), brachiocephalic vessels involvement (OR=2.25, 95% CI 1.20 to 4.24, P=0.011 7), acute liver insufficiency (OR=2.60, 95% CI 1.46 to 4.64, P=0.001 2), white blood cell count (WBC)>15×109 cells/L (OR=1.87, 95% CI 1.21 to 2.89, P=0.004 9) and massive pericardial effusion (OR=4.34, 95% CI 2.45 to 7.69, P<0.000 1). Based on these multivariable results, a reliable and simple bedside risk prediction tool was developed. Conclusion Different clinical manifestations and imaging features of patients with Stanford type A AAD predict the risk of in-hospital mortality. This model can be used to assist physicians to quickly identify high risk patients and to make reasonable treatment decisions.
ObjectiveTo discuss the efficacy of type Ⅱ hybrid aortic arch repair for type A aortic dissection in patients of different age groups.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 126 patients with type A aortic dissection admitted to the Fuwai Hospital between January 2016 and December 2018, including 78 (61.9%) males and 48 (38.1%) females, with an average age of 61.8±6.9 years. The patients were divided into an elderly group (≥60 years, n=82) and a non-elderly group (<60 years, n=44). The preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative data of patients in the two groups were compared.ResultsThe age between the elderly and non-elderly group was significantly different (65.9±4.1 years vs. 54.3±4.1 years, P<0.010), and no significant difference was found between the two groups in other preoperative baseline data. There were 6 (4.8%) patients of early death, 3 (2.4%) patients of stroke and 2 (1.6%) patients of paralysis. A total of 194 stents were implanted, and the average dimeter of the stents was 33.6±1.8 mm and the average length was 199.0±6.7 mm. The non-elderly group had shorter mechanical ventilation time (31.9±41.7 h vs. 61.0±89.2 h, P=0.043) and ICU stay time (77.8±51.4 h vs. 143.1±114.4 h, P<0.001) than the elderly group. There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality rate, reoperation rate or survival rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Follow-up time was 1-43 (22.6±10.8) months, and 3 patients were lost. There were 104 (82.5%) patients of complete thrombus formation of false lumen in stent and endoleak was reported in 11 (9.2%) patients.ConclusionType Ⅱ hybrid aortic arch repair offers an alternative approach to acute type A aortic dissection with acceptable early and mid-term clinical effects. The non-elderly patients have a similar early treatment effect to the elderly patients, but have a better mid-term outcome.