Objective To discuss the therapeutic effect of distal fixed modular femoral prosthesis for the hip prosthesis revision. Methods Between August 2004 and May 2008, cementless modular femoral prosthesis was used for hip prosthesis revision in 21 cases. There were 9 males and 12 females, aged from 49 to 72 years (mean, 64.6 years). The timefrom revision to total hip arthroplasty was 2 to 18 years (mean, 11.7 years). The causes of revision included aseptic loosening in 19 cases (5 cases were periprosthetic femoral fracture), and deep infection in 2 cases. First revision was given in all patients. Preoperative Harris score was 41.8 ± 3.5; pain visual analogue score (VAS) was 7.62 ± 0.86. Results All patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention, and no deep venous thrombosis and nerve injury occurred. Twenty-one cases were followed up 2 to 6 years with an average of 4.3 years. No prosthetic loosening or infection occurred. Bone ingrowth was observed around the implant during the follow-up period. At last follow-up, 2 cases had femoral stem subsidence without obvious hip pain and other symptoms, and no special treatment was given. Harris score was 82.7 ± 3.3 and VAS score was 0.19 ± 0.51 at last follow-up, showing significant differences when compared with those before operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The short-term result of modular femoral prosthesis is satisfactory in hip prosthesis revision, and it can improve the hip function and rel ieve the pain greatly.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the mid- and long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis.MethodsA clinical data of 354 patients (384 hips) with hip disease who underwent THA with Ribbed femoral stem prostheses between October 2006 and May 2016 was retrospectively analyzed. There were 171 males and 183 females, with an average age of 53.4 years (range, 20-82 years). There were 324 cases of single hip and 30 cases of bilateral hips. The cause of THA included the avascular necrosis of the femoral head in 151 cases (159 hips), hip osteoarthritis in 134 cases (136 hips), rheumatoid arthritis in 43 cases (43 hips), ankylosing spondylitis in 20 cases (40 hips), and trauma in 6 cases (6 hips). The Harris score of total 354 patients before operation was 42.34±8.89. Harris scores were used to evaluate hip function after operation. X-ray films were used to determine the length of the lower limb, the radiolucent line on the femur side, the stability of the prosthesis, and the occurrence of stress shielding.ResultsThe incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 2-11 years with an average of 7.4 years. The Harris score at last follow-up was 80.52±7.61, which significantly increased when compared with preoperative score (t=134.804, P=0.000). Two cases (2 hips) of prosthetic infections, 3 cases (3 hips) of prothesis loosening, and 4 cases (4 hips) of periprosthetic fractures, and 48 cases (48 hips) of mild to moderate thigh pain occurred after operation. X-ray films showed 76 cases (78 hips) with radiolucent lines on the femur side and stress shielding. According to the Engh’s method, there were 364 hips of bone ingrowth, 15 hips of fibrosis ingrowth, and 5 hips of prosthesis instability. The femoral stem subsidence occurred in 25 cases (25 hips), and the difference in leg length discrepancy was more than 10 mm in 5 patients.ConclusionTHA with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis can achieve satisfactory effectiveness with good initial stability and rapid bone growth. The incidence of stress shielding is relatively high, but the stress shielding has no significant impact on the mid- and long-term survival rate and effectiveness of femoral prosthesis.
Objective To evaluate the mid-term effectiveness of two-stage hip prosthesis revision in the treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty. Methods Between April 2002 and November 2006, 12 cases of infection after hip arthroplasty were treated. There were 5 males and 7 females, aged from 47 to 72 years (mean, 59.8 years). The femoral head arthroplasty wasperformed in 2 cases and total hip arthroplasty in 10 cases. Infection occurred 1 to 67 months after arthroplasty. According to the Segawa classification criteria, infections included type 2 in 1 case, type 3 in 2 cases, and type 4 in 9 cases. The preoperative Harris score was 36.7 ± 6.1. Nine cases had elevated C reactive protein and 10 cases had elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The results of bacterial culture were positive in 8 cases and negative in 4 cases. After the removal of the infected prosthesis and thorough debridement, antibiotic-loaded cement spacers or infected therapeutic temporary prosthesis were used as placeholders, and then the anti-infection treatments were given after operations; two-stage hip prosthesis revisions were performed 3 to 10 months after debridement. Results In 1 patient who failed to control infection after debridement, infection was controlled after the second debridement and the antibiotic-loaded cement spacer as placeholder. Other patients achieved heal ing of incision by first intention, and no compl ication such as deep venous thrombosis and nerve injury occurred. All patients were followed up 3 to 8 years after revision (mean, 5.4 years). During the follow-up, no infection recurrence and joint dislocation occurred. Dull pain was present in 2 cases during activity and mild claudication in 3 cases at last follow-up. The Harris score was 81.6 ± 4.5, showing significant difference (t=52.696, P=0.000) when compared with preoperative score. The X-ray films showed that noprosthesis loosening and obvious subsidence were observed, and bone graft healed. Conclusion The two-stage hip prosthesis revision has good infection control rate and mid-term effectiveness in treatment of infection after hip arthroplasty.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of open reduction and internal fixation for bipolar fracture-dislocation of the forearm.MethodsBetween June 2014 and March 2019, 14 patients with bipolar fracture-dislocation of the forearm were treated. There were 9 males and 5 females, aged from 19 to 52 years (mean, 34.9 years). There were 8 cases of falling injuries, 4 cases of traffic accident injuries, 1 case of sports injury, and 1 case of machine strangulation injury. The time from injury to admission was 2-48 hours, with an average of 16.6 hours. All patients were closed injuries. All patients were treated with open reduction and internal fixation; the upper radioulnar joints were treated with circumferential ligament repair or lateral collateral ligament repair according to the joint stability. And the patients with lower radioulnar joint instability were also treated with the TightRope plate with loop fixation. After 3 weeks of plaster fixation, the patients started functional exercises. The fracture healing time, stability and range of motion of wrist and elbow joints, and forearm rotation function were recorded. The effectiveness was evaluated by Anderson’s forearm function score at last follow-up.ResultsThe incisions healed by first intention. All 14 cases were followed up 12-36 months with an average of 24.8 months. All fractures healed, with an average healing time of 14.9 weeks (range, 12-18 weeks). The stabilities of the upper and lower radioulnar joints restored well. At last follow-up, the elbow flexion and extension range of motion was 65°-160°, with an average of 124.6°; the wrist flexion and extension range of motion was 115°-165°, with an average of 155.0°; the forearm rotation range of motion was 65°-165°, with an average of 154.6°. According to Anderson’s forearm function score, 8 cases were excellent, 5 cases were good, and 1 case was unsatisfactory. ConclusionThe treatment of bipolar fracture-dislocation of the forearm needs comprehensive consideration and individualized treatment plan. The focus is to restore the anatomical structure of the radius and ulna and firm internal fixation, stabilize the upper and lower radioulnar joints, and perform functional exercises as soon as possible after operation to obtain satisfactory effectiveness.