ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effect of day surgery mode and inpatient operation mode for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients.MethodsThirty-seven elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated in day surgery mode in the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from July 2018 to July 2019 were retrospectively included. At the same time, another 37 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture treated in general inpatient operation mode in the same period were randomly selected. The preoperative waiting time, operation time, length of hospital stay, hospital expenses, postoperative complications, and clinical effect were compared between the two groups.ResultsThere was no significant difference in operation time [(56.21±10.75) vs. (58.81±12.56) min] or postoperative Harris hip scores (1 month after surgery: 61.03±7.74 vs. 59.47±7.42; 3 months after surgery: 85.40±4.22 vs. 85.03±4.33) between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of the preoperative waiting time [(23.17±3.18) vs. (52.64±10.12) h], length of hospital stay [(2.01±0.97) vs. (8.34±4.22) d], hospital expenses [(4.012±0.771)×104 vs. (4.679±1.117)×104 yuan], and the incidence of deep venous thrombosis during perioperative period (10.8% vs.37.8%), the day surgery mode group had more obvious advantages than general inpatient operation mode group (P<0.05).ConclusionsDay surgery mode is safe and effective for intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients. It is worthy of great application for clinical work in the future.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of clinical pathway in patients undergoing orthopedic day surgery.MethodsPatients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2020 were selected as the clinical pathway group, and all of them were managed by clinical pathway. Patients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2019 were selected as the routine group, and all of them were managed by conventional clinical methods. The general conditions of patients, physicians’ work efficiency, medical costs and medical quality were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe clinical pathway group included 246 patients, and the routine group included 391 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age or disease distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine group, the clinical pathway group had obvious advantages in terms of average time spent by a physician in issuing a medical order each time [(5.64±3.29) vs. (2.12±1.05) min], average number of revisions per physician’s order (1.40±0.24 vs. 0.38±0.19), rate of filing medical records within 3 days (90.28% vs. 97.97%), hospital costs [(7462.10±1035.01) vs. (6252.52±1189.05) yuan], drug costs [(652.21±88.53) vs. (437.17±108.20) yuan], length of stay [(1.23±1.04) vs. (1.02±0.18) d] and delayed discharge rate (7.93% vs. 2.03%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of unplanned reoperation rate, unplanned rehospitalization rate, or patient satisfaction (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with routine clinical management, clinical pathway management can improve work efficiency, reduce medical cost and improve medical quality more effectively in the implementation of orthopedic day surgery, which has very positive effects and is worthy of promotion and application.