ObjectiveTo summarize the related researches of pancreatic portal hypertension (PPH) in recent years in order to diagnose and treat the disease more timely and effectively. MethodThe literatures relevant to etiology, mechanism, clinical features, diagnostic criteria, and treatment of PPH were searched and reviewed. ResultsThe occurrence of PPH was related to its anatomical structure. Its clinical manifestations were not characteristic, but it was not difficult to diagnose by the assistance of auxiliary examinations. The treatment of PPH was mainly targeted at pancreatic diseases and portal hypertension, and the treatment targeted at portal hypertension was performed according to the situation with or without gastrointestinal bleeding. So, in clinical practice, different treatment measures should be taken according to different situations. ConclusionAt present, the clinical diagnosis and treatment of PPH is relatively mature, but its preventive treatment is still controversial, which will be the focus of future research.
【摘要】 目的 比较胫骨平台骨折术后辅助与不辅助持续被动运动（continuous passive motion，CPM）的临床疗效。 方法 对2008年6月-2009年6月86例行手术治疗的闭合性、无合并损伤的胫骨平台骨折患者进行回顾性分析。根据是否辅助CPM分为CPM组27例和非CPM组（对照组）59例。对两组患者的伤口愈合情况，膝关节屈曲、伸直角度，以及膝关节功能恢复情况进行比较。 结果 两组伤口甲级愈合率差异无统计学意义（P=0.566）。在术后2周和6周，CPM组患者的膝关节屈曲角度明显大于对照组（Plt;0.001），但在术后3个月和12个月，两组的差异无统计学意义（P=0.219，P=0.512）。在术后2、6周，3、12个月，CPM组和对照组患者的膝关节伸直角度差异无统计学意义。在术后12个月的Rasmussen膝关节功能评分方面，CPM组和对照组的差异无统计学意义。 结论 胫骨平台骨折术后辅助CPM能早期提升膝关节屈曲角度，但并不能提高远期的膝关节活动度和最终的膝关节功能。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of continuous passive motion (CPM) treatment after tibial plateau fractures operation. Methods From June 2008 to June 2009, 86 patients were treated due to closed tibial plateau fractures without combined injuries. The patients were treated with (27 patients, CPM group) and without (59 patients, control group) CPM. The wound healing rates, range of motion and the knee function were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference between the two groups in wound healing rates (P=0.566). Two and six weeks after the operation, there were significant differences between the two groups in flexion degree (Plt;0.001); three and 12 months after the operation, there were no significant differences between the two groups (P=0.219, P=0.512). At the 2nd and 6th week, 3rd and 12th month postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the groups in extension degree. Twelve months after the operation, there were no significant differences between the groups in functional recovery of the knee. Conclusion CPM in the post-operative treatment of tibial plateau fractures is effective increasing knee flexion in the early stage, but is not effective increasing range of motion or knee function in a long term.