【摘要】 目的 探讨一次性麻醉穿刺包与普通腹腔穿刺包在腹腔化疗中应用效果。 方法 将2008年6月-2009年4月住院的胃癌和卵巢癌行腹腔化疗的患者53例，随机分为两组。实验组29例，用一次性麻醉穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化疗；对照组24例，用普通腹腔穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化疗；比较两组患者应用不同穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化疗的并发症比较。 结果 实验组并发症发生率明显低于对照组(Plt;0.05)。 结论 一次性麻醉穿刺包应用于腹腔化疗中操作简便、创伤小、并发症少，患者乐于接受等优点，值得在临床上推广使用。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effects of one-off anesthesia paracentesis kit and ordinary peritoneal paracentesis kit in intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Methods A total of 53 patients with gastric cancer or ovarian cancer from June 2008 to April 2009 were randomly divided into two groups: 29 patients in trial group underwent intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with one-off anesthesia paracentesis kit, and 24 patients in the control group underwent intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with ordinary peritoneal paracentesis kit. The complications in two groups were compared. Results The incidence of complications in trial group was much lower than that in the control group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion One-off anesthesia paracentesis kit in intra-peritoneal chemotherapy has several advantages including simple manipulation, small injuries, and few complications, which is well accepted by the patients.
Objective To investigate the influence of self-care and self-efficacy intervention on the quality of life of patients undergoing chemotherapy after surgery for gastric cancer. Methods Sixty-four patients undergoing chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery between July 2014 and February 2015 were selected as the study subjects. According the sequence of admission, they were divided into intervention group (n=34) and control group (n=30). Patients in the control group accepted conventional care, while those in the intervention group received self-efficacy and self-care interventions. The scores of General Self-efficacy Scale (GCES), Exercise of Self-care Agency (ESCA), and Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients-Stomach Cancer (QLICP-ST) were compared between the two groups before and after intervention. Results After intervention, GCES scores of the intervention group and the control group were respectively (30.08±4.21) and (20.78±4.58) points; the total scores of ESCA were respectively (132.30±14.81) and (92.45±13.23) points; and the total scores of QLICP-ST were respectively (75.96±9.41) and (56.77±10.32) points. All the above differences between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Self-care and self-efficacy intervention can improve self-care ability and self-efficacy, and improve the quality of life of patients undergoing chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery.