Objective To explore the effect of 16F gastric tube on pain relief in postoperative lung cancer patients. Methods A total of 118 lung cancer patients were treated with radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital between January 2015 and May 2016. The patients were assigned into two groups: a 16F gastric tube group (16F group, 60 patients, 30 males and 30 females at age of 41-73 (52.13±7.83) years and a 28F drainage tube group (28F group, 58 patients, 25 males and 33 females at age of 45-75 (55.62±4.27) years. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results There was no statistical difference in drainage time (4.47±1.03 dvs. 4.24±1.16 d, P=0.473), drainage amount (560.37±125.00 mlvs. 656.03±132.45 ml, P=0.478), incidences of pneumothorax (5/60 vs. 2/58, P=0.439), pleural effusion (6/60 vs. 3/58, P=0.522), and subcutaneous emphysema (3/60 vs. 1/58, P=0.635) between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain caused by the drainage tube in the16F group was less than that in the 28F drainage tube group with a statistical difference (F=4 242.996, P<0.001). The frequency of taking analgesics in the 16F group was significantly less than that in the 28F group (12/60vs. 26/58, P<0.001). Conclusion The effects of draining pleural effusions and promoting lung recruitment are similar between the 16F group and the 28F group. However, the wound pain caused by 16F gastric tube is significantly less than that by 28F drainage tube.
ObjectiveTo explore the safety and feasibility of surgical treatment of simultaneous multiple primary cancer–hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.MethodThe clinical data of one patient with simultaneous multiple primary cancer of hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, who treated in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University in April 2019 was analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe patient was diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma on admission. After MDT in the hospital, the patient underwent anterior right hepatectomy + cholecystectomy and radical resection of esophageal carcinoma in turn. The procedure of anterior right hepatectomy + cholecystectomy was smooth, the duration of the surgery was 270 min, and the total blood loss was 500 mL, and postoperative pathology showed that hepatocellular carcinoma was in grade Ⅱ. The operation process of radical resection of esophageal cancer was smooth too, the duration of the surgery was 176 min, and the total blood loss was 100 mL, and postoperative pathology showed moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. No related surgical complications occurred after the operation. Thirteen months after the operation of liver cancer and 10 months after the operation of esophageal cancer, the patient was generally in good condition, well wound healing, and no clinical recurrence. The follow-up of the patient was continued.ConclusionIn allusion to simultaneous multiple primary cancers, it is safe and feasible to evaluate the location, pathological stage, and general condition of the patient by combining multi-disciplinary diagnosis and treatment and then performing radical operations in turn.