Objective To observe the gene mutation and clinical phenotype of patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and cone rod dystrophy (CORD). Methods Thirty-seven patients with RP and 6 patients with CORD and 95 family members were enrolled in the study. The patient’s medical history and family history were collected. All the patients and family members received complete ophthalmic examinations to determine the phenotype, including best corrected visual acuity, slit lamp microscope, indirect ophthalmoscopy, color fundus photography, optical coherence tomography, full-field electroretinogram, and fluorescein fundus angiography. DNA was abstracted from patients and family members. Using target region capture sequencing combined with next-generation sequencing to screen the 232 candidate pathogenic mutations. Polymerase chain reaction and direct sequencing were used to confirm the pathogenic pathogenic mutations and Co-segregation is performed among members in the family to determine pathogenic mutation sites. The relationship between genotype and clinical phenotype of RP and CORD was analyzed. Results Of the 37 patients with RP, 13 were from 6 families, including 4 families with autosomal dominant inheritance, 2 families with autosomal recessive inheritance, and 3 in 6 families were detected pathogenic gene mutations. 24 cases were scattered RP. Six patients with CORD were from four families, all of which were autosomal recessive. Of the 43 patients, 21 patients were detected the pathogenic gene mutation, and the positive rate was 48.8%. Among them, 15 patients with RP were detected 10 pathogenic gene mutations including USH2A, RP1, MYO7A, C8orf37, RPGR, SNRNP200, CRX, PRPF31, C2orf71, IMPDH1, and the clinical phenotype included 10 typical RP, 2 cases of RPSP, 3 cases of Usher syndrome type 2 and 6 cases of CORD patients were all detected pathogenic gene mutations, including 2 cases of ABCA4, 2 mutations of RIMS1 gene, 1 case of CLN3 gene mutation, and 1 case of CRB1 and RPGR double gene mutation. Conclusions RP and CORD are clinically diverse in genotype and clinically phenotypically similar. For patients with early RP and CORD, clinical phenotype combined with genetic analysis is required to determine the diagnosis of RP and CORD.
ObjectiveTo identify 3 the disease-causing genes and mutations of Leber congenital amaurosis (LCA), and to study the correlation of phenotype and genotype. MethodsA retrospective study. Four LCA patients and seven family members who were diagnosed by eye examination in Ning Xia Eye Hospital of People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region from January to December 2021 were included in the study. Four patients were from 3 unrelated families. Detailed collection of medical history and family history were received. Related ophthalmologic examination were collected and genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood. Whole-exome sequencing method was used for genetic diagnosis. The identified variant was confirmed with Sanger sequencing. Potential pathogenic mutation was analyzed using software and conserved domain analysis and performed co-separated analysis between the family member and the proband. ResultsOf the 4 patients, 1 patient was males and 3 patients were females; the age was from 4 to 18 years. Nystagmus were seen in 3 cases, finger pressing eyes and night blindness was seen in 1 cases; electroretinogram showed 4 cases of extinction or near extinction. The foveal reflection was visible in all eyes, and there was no obvious abnormality in the peripheral retina. One eye had strong reflection signal with raised ellipsoid in macular area; two eyes had weak reflection signal faintly visible between retinal layers; 1 eye had increased blood vessel branches, peripheral retinal non-perfusion area with capillary leakage; annular strong autofluorescence in macular area 4 eyes. No obvious abnormality was found in the phenotypes of family members. Genetic testing showed that the proband of pedigree 1 (Ⅱ-1) was found a homozygous missense mutation in c.640A>T (p.C214S) (M1) of PRPH2 gene. The proband of pedigree 2 (Ⅱ-2) was found compound heterozygous mutation in c.1256G>A(p.R419Q) (M2) and c.1A>C (p.M1L) (M3) of TULP1 gene. The proband 3 (Ⅱ-1) and her sister (Ⅱ-2) were both found compound heterozygous mutation in c.1943T>C (p.L648P) (M4) and c.380C>T (p.P127L) (M5) of GUCY2D gene. The parents and sister (Ⅱ-1) of the proband in family 2 and the parents of the proband in family 3 were all carriers of the corresponding heterozygous variant. M1, M3, M4, M5 were novel mutations and unreported. The genotype and disease phenotype were co-segregated within the family. According to the analysis of pedigree and genetic testing results, all 3 families were autosomal recessive inheritance. The amino acid conservation analysis found that M1, M2, M3, M4, and M5 were highly conserved among species. The results of bioinformatics analysis were all pathogenic variants. ConclusionsPRPH2 gene M1, TULP1 gene M3, and GUCY2D gene M4, M5 were novel mutations and not been reported in the literature and database. This research expanded the gene mutation spectrum of LCA. The patients with LCA have available characterristics, including onset age, varying ocular fundus and severe visual impairment.