ObjectiveTo explore a strategy for selecting and evaluating the warranty contract of medical equipment.MethodsBased on the operating costs of the two linear accelerators between 2016 and 2019, we obtained the criticality of medical equipment by using the five indicators, including necessity of maintenance, function, risk, importance, and age of medical equipment, selected the warranty strategy by comparing the cost of key components, and adjusted and optimized the warranty strategy based on the economic benefit assessment during the implementation process of warranty contract.ResultsThe criticalities of the two linear accelerators were both 18 points, and it was recommended to purchase warranty service. By comparing the cost of key components, the annual average maintenance cost of the key components of the two accelerators was lower than the annual warranty cost, so we chose the semi-guaranteed contract. Finally, according to the economic benefit accounting and evaluation in the implementation process of the warranty contracts of the two linear accelerators, the linear accelerator 1 remained unchanged, and the linear accelerator 2 was turned from the semi-guaranteed contract into the full insurance contract when we renewed the warranty contract.ConclusionsThe warranty contract selection and evaluation strategy proposed in this paper has certain guiding significance for the choice of strategy of warranty contract. By choosing the appropriate warranty service scope and warranty strategy, and continuous adjusting and optimizing according to the actual performance of the contract, we can effectively guarantee the operational efficiency of medical equipment, and reduce operating costs simultaneously.