Objective To explore the safety and costs of orthopedic robot-assisted treatment of calcaneal fractures. Methods The data of patients with calcaneal fractures treated by surgery in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital between January 2021 and July 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching was used to match 1∶4 patients with orthopedic robotic-assisted closed reduction and internal fixation of calcaneal fractures (orthopedic robotic group) and traditional open reduction and internal fixation surgery (traditional surgery group). The safety and costs were compared between the two groups after matching. Results A total of 253 patients were included and divided into orthopedic robotic group (11 cases) and traditional surgery group (242 cases) according to different surgical methods. Before propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in age, gender, diagnosis and comorbidities between the two groups (P>0.05). After propensity score matching, there were 11 patients in the orthopedic robotic group and 44 patients in the traditional surgery group. There was no significant difference in age, gender, diagnosis and comorbidities between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in height, weight, body mass index, operation duration, average postoperative pain score, and highest postoperative pain score between the two groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss [10.0 (10.0, 20.0) vs. 20.0 (20.0, 50.0) mL], total length of hospital stay [(4.5±1.3) vs. (8.7±3.7) d], and postoperative length of hospital stay [(2.3±1.1) vs. (4.5±2.3) d] in the orthopedic robotic group were less than the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the total hospitalization costs, rehabilitation costs, inspection and examination costs between the two groups (P>0.05). The surgical cost of orthopedic robot group [1413.7 (1287.7, 1790.8) vs. 2331.2 (2195.1, 2548.6) yuan], total ward cost [(3154.5±1213.7) vs. (5711.9±2147.4) yuan], ward consumables cost [(1407.0±942.0) vs. (2409.4±1458.2) yuan], ward medication costs [(257.1±146.6) vs. (846.7±525.2) yuan], ward diagnosis and treatment costs [(901.6±366.6) vs. (2010.5±830.6) yuan], nursing care costs [(159.6±46.1) vs. (345.2±174.7) yuan], total postoperative costs [(2370.4±1324.0) vs. (3888.6±1554.9) yuan], postoperative care costs [(105.4±52.2) vs. ( 205.6±128.2) yuan] were lower than the traditional surgery group (P<0.05). Conclusion Orthopedic robot-assisted treatment of calcaneal fractures can effectively reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten hospitalization time, and have good safety. At the same time, it can reduce operating costs, total ward costs, ward medication costs and nursing costs.