Objective To investigate clinicopathologic features, pathogenesis, and diagnosis and treatment of hereditary pancreatitis (HP). Method The relevant literatures on HP research in recent years were searched and reviewed. Results The HP was similar to the pancreatitis caused by the cholelithiasis, excessive alcohol consumption, hyperlipidemia, etc. in the histomorphology, function, and clinical manifestations and it was difficult to be distinguished. However, HP was different from the other types of chronic pancreatitis due to its early onset, familial, and high risk of pancreatic cancer. The HP was mainly caused by the PRSS1 mutations, and its mutation types mainly included the R122H, N29I, A16V, K23R, etc., among which the R122H and N29I were the two most common types of mutations. There was no specific treatment for the HP. The principles of treatment of HP were similar to the pancreatitist caused by other etiologies, including the nutritional support, blood sugar control, analgesia, etc.. In addition to the medical treatment, the surgical intervention was also the important means for the treatment of HP, including the pancreatic partial resection, total pancreatectomy or total pancreatectomy combined with islet cell autografting. Conclusions HP is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease characterized by recurrent attacks of pancreatitis. Relevant gene tests could be performed for patient with highly suspected HP. It faces great challenges in treatment of HP. Pathogenesis of HP needs to be constantly explored and experimental study of multicenter and large sample needs to be further studied in order to determine its best treatment strategy.
ObjectiveTo understand advances in the timing and surgical mode selection of gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgical intervention for acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP).MethodThe recent literatures on the timing and choice of gastrointestinal endoscopy and surgical treatments aimed at ABP were reviewed.ResultsFor ABP patients with early cholangitis or biliary obstruction, no matter how serious, endoscopic treatment should be used to relieve obstruction and relieve symptoms. For patients only with ABP, if non-surgical treatment was not effective and patients showed symptoms such as biliary obstruction or biliary tract infection, endoscopic intervention should be considered. Most ABP patients had milder symptoms and could undergo cholecystectomy during the same hospitalization to prevent ABP recurrence after symptoms relief. Patients with severe ABP could be treated with cholecystectomy along with pancreatic necrotic tissue removal, and surgery should be performed after the disease was controlled. If the preoperative imaging examination highly suspected that there were stones in the biliary tract, biliary exploration should be performed at the same time. Laparoscopic surgery should be selected as far as possible to facilitate the postoperative recovery of the patient.ConclusionsFor patients with ABP, whether endoscopic or surgical treatment, the timing and surgical mode selection should follow the specific clinical situation with the “individualization” principle of the treatment. We should make the reasonable and effective policy at diagnosis and treatment according to different conditions.