Objective To make an evidence-based treatment plan for a smoker with periimplantitis. Methods Based on the clinical problems raised from the case, we searched The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2009), ACP Journal Club (1991 to July 2009), MEDLINE (1950 to July 2009), EMbase (1980 to July 2009) and Chinese Journal Fulltext Database (1994 to July 2009) for guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The quality of the included studies was assessed. Results A total of 4 systematic reviews, 8 RCTs were included. The following methods were supported by Level A evidence: (1) Scaling combined with local antibiotics; (2) Guided bone regeneration; (3) Non-surgical debridement with titanium hand-instruments or with an ultrasonic device. Based on the available evidence, we proposed a three-stage therapy plan for the patient: In the first stage, full mouth ultrasonic scaling was performed. The peri-implant pocket was debrided with plastic curettes, and then minocycline gel was applied once a week for four times. The patient was persuaded to maintain oral hygiene and quit smoking. In the second stage, four weeks later, open flap debridement and guided bone regeneration were conducted. In the third stage, long-term care of oral hygiene and dental implants were performed. After 6 months of follow-up, the peri-implant tissues were healthy with no evidence of inflammation, bleeding or suppuration. Conclusion Based on the approach of evidence-based medicine, we accomplished the treatment of the case with reliable outcomes.
The data collection form is a bridge in-between the original studies and the final systematic reviews. It’s the basis for data analyses, directly related to the results and conclusions of systematic reviews, and plays an important role in systematic reviews. There are strict requirements of data collection forms in making Cochrane systematic reviews. In this article, the authors introduce their experiences regarding to the design of data collection form.
Objective To explore the type and frequency of oral care practice in intensive care units (ICUs) in Mainland China, and to provide evidence and suggestions for improving oral care practice. Methods Three survey methods, including mailing questionnaires to ICUs of Grade 3A hospitals, consulting experts in this field and visiting accessible ICUs, were used to survey current oral care practice in Mainland China. Results A total of 184 questionnaires were given to the subjects, of which 79 effective ones were collected, and the response rate was 42.93%. All 79 respondents considered oral care very unimportant, and 98.7% of the ICUs performed oral care in different ways. Currently, the cotton ball wipe-off method was the most frequently used for oral care (62.5%), with an average (9.1± 5.1) min per time, twice or three times daily. The mouthwashes often used were saline (76.1%), solutions containing sodium bicarbonate (22.8%), furacilin (13.9%), and hydrogen dioxide (13.9%). Conclusion The oral care practice for the critically-ill patients in ICUs of China is unsatisfactory, although it is perceived as an important item in nursing care. More evidence–based training should be given and it is necessary to establish a national oral care guideline for critically-ill patients.