Objective To discuss the main points of technique and the range of fusion in posterior operation of spinal stenosis associated with lumbar degenerative kyphosis (LDK). Methods The cl inical data were retrospectively analysedfrom 20 cases of spinal stenosis associated with LDK which were performed posterior operation from February 2001 to February 2008. There were 1 male and 19 females, aged 52-81 years old with an average of 64 years old. The course of disease was 6-10 years. All patients had severe low back pain. According to Frankel’s neurologic function classification, there were 18 cases of grade E and 2 cases of grade D before operation. The apex of LDK included L1 in 3 cases, L2 in 10 and L3 in 7. The operational method was decided according to different characteristics of LDK. All patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 included 6 cases of sciatica and intermittent claudication with worse physical status, the segmental decompression of spinal canal, posterior intervertebral fusion and short transpedical instrument fixation were performed. Group 2 included 8 cases whose Cobb angle of LDK was less than 20°, the segmental decompression of spinal canal, posterior intervertebral fusion and one-level or multilevel lamina osteotomy were performed, instrumentation-assisted correction was used. Group 3 included 6 cases whose Cobb angle of LDK was more than 20°, the canal decompression and one-level transvertebral wedge osteotomy were performed, instrumentation-assisted correction, intervertebral fusion and posterior-lateral fusion were used. Results Incision healedby first intention in all patients. One patient suffered from superior mesenteric artery syndrome at 6 hours after operationand healed after symptomatic management. The neurologic function was improved to grade E at 2 weeks after opeartion. All patients were followed-up 24-54 months (average 26 months). At last follow-up，the Oswestry Disabil ity Index of all patients was 30.5% ± 9.6%; showing significant difference when compared with preoperation (55.9% ± 11.8%, P lt; 0.05). The back pain scoring and leg pain scoring were 2.8 ± 1.6 and 2.4 ± 1.6, respectively according to the Numeric Rating Scale score; showing significant differences when compared with preoperation (7.5 ± 0.5 and 7.3 ± 0.7, P lt; 0.05). The Numeric Rating Scale score and Oswestry Disabil ity Index in all patients were improved obviously when compared with before operation (P lt; 0.05). During the follow-up period, there was no instrumentation failure or correction loss and the fusion rate was up to 100%. Conclusion For spinal stenosis associated with LDK patients, the most important therapic purpose is to improve cl inical symptom through reconstruction lumbar stabil ization and spinal biomechanics l ine in sagittal plane. Overall estimate of the cl inical appearance and imageology character is necessary when making decision of which segments needed to be fixation and fusion. Individual ized treatment strategy may be the best choice.
【Abstract】 Objective To discuss the main points of techniques and ranges of fusion in posterior operation ofdegenerated lumbar scol iosis compl icated spinal stenosis. Methods From February 2001 to September 2006, 23 cases with degenerated lumbar scol iosis stenosis were treated by posterior operation. There were 9 males and 14 females, with the average age of 65.3 years (ranging from 52 years to 71 years). The course of the diseases was 4 to 8 years. All patients were presented with severe low back pain. All patients were measured for Cobb angle of curves(17° to 53°), and lordosis angle of lumbar (-20° to -10° 10 cases, -40° to -20° 13 cases). Ten cases in which Cobb angle was smaller than 20° were operated by l imited segmental decompression of spinal canal, posterior intervertebral fusion and short transpedical instrument fixation. For the rest 13 cases in which Cobb angle was bigger than 20° were operated by canal decompression, longer instrument for scol iosis correction, intervertebral fusion and posterior-lateral fusion. The fixation and fusion were located at L4-S1 in 6 cases, L1-5 in 5, L2-5 in 4, L1-S1 in 5, L2-S1 in 2 and T10-S1 in 1. Results There was no patient who died from the operation. Average Cobb angle in coronal plane was 0° to 21° with the average of 15.6°. The lumbar lordosis angle was -48.0° to -18.2° with the average of -36.4°. There were 21 cases (91%) with sciatica and intermittent claudication who were clearly released. There were 20 cases (87%) whose low back pain intensely decreased. Three cases with drop-foot returned to normal activities. During the mean 15-month (6 to 54 months) follow-up for 23 cases, there was no change of corrected results and fusion rate was 100%. Conclusion For degenerated lumbar scol iosis patients, the most important purpose of the treatment is to improve cl inical symptoms through sufficient decompression of neural structures. Lumbar stabil ization reconstruction and benign spinal biomechanics l ine conduce to longterm curative effect. Overall estimate of the cl inical appearances and imageology characters is necessary when the decision, that segments are needed to be fixed and fused should be made. The strategy of the individual ized treatment may be the best choice.
【Abstract】 Objective To investigate the clinical significances of the thoracic pedicle classification determined by inner cortical width of pedicle in posterior vertebral column resection (PVCR) with free hand technique for the treatment of rigid and severe spinal deformities. Methods Between October 2004 and July 2010, 56 patients with rigid and severe spinal deformities underwent PVCR. A total of 1 098 screws were inserted into thoracic pedicles at T2-12. The inner cortical width of the thoracic pedicle was measured and divided into 4 groups: group 1 (0-1.0 mm), group 2 (1.1-2.0 mm), group 3 (2.1-3.0 mm), and group 4 (gt; 3.1 mm). The success rate of screw-insertion into the thoracic pedicles was analyzed statistically. A new 3 groups was divided according to the statistical results and the success rate of screw-insertion into the thoracic pedicles was analyzed statistically again. And statistical analysis was performed between different types of thoracic pedicles classification for pedicle morphological method by Lenke. Results There were significant differences in the success rate of screw-insertion between the other groups (P lt; 0.008) except between group 3 and group 4 (χ2=2.540，P=0.111). The success rates of screw-insertion were 35.05% in group 1, 65.34% in group 2, and 88.32% in group 3, showing significant differences among 3 groups (P lt; 0.017). According to Lenke classification, the success rates of screw-insertion were 82.31% in type A, 83.40% in type B, 80.00% in type C, and 30.28% in type D, showing no significant differences (P gt; 0.008) among types A, B, and C except between type D and other 3 types (P lt; 0.008). In the present study, regarding the distribution of different types of thoracic pedicles, types I, II a, and II b thoracic pedicles accounted for 17.67%, 16.03%, and 66.30% of the total thoracic pedicles, respectively. The type I, II a, and II b thoracicpedicles at the concave side accounted for 24.59%, 21.13%, and 54.28%, and at the convex side accounted for 10.75%, 10.93%, and 78.32%, respectively. Conclusion A quantification classification standard of thoracic pedicles is presented according to the inner cortical width of the pedicle on CT imaging: type I thoracic pedicle, an absent channel with an inner cortical width of 0-1.0 mm; type II thoracic pedicle, a channel, including type IIa thoracic pedicle with an inner cortical width of 1.1-2.0 mm, and type IIb thoracic pedicle with an inner cortical width more than 2.1 mm. The thoracic pedicle classification method has high prediction accuracy of screw-insertion when PVCR is performed.
Objective To analyze the cl inical features of scol iosis associated with Chiari I malformation in adolescent patients, and to explore the val idity and safety of one-stage posterior approach and vertebral column resection for the correction of severe scol iosis. Methods Between October 2004 and August 2008, 17 adolescent patients with scol iosis associated with Chiari I malformation were treated with surgical correction through posterior approach and pedicle instrumentation. There were 9 males and 8 females with an average age of 15.1 years (range, 12-19 years). The MRI scanning showed that 16 of 17 patients had syringomyel ia in cervical or thoracic spinal cord. Apex vertebra of scol iosis were located atT7-12. One-stage posterior vertebral column resection and instrumental correction were performed on 9 patients whose Cobb angle of scol iosis or kyphosis was more than 90°, or who was associated with apparent neurological deficits (total spondylectomy group). Other 8 patients underwent posterior instrumental correction alone (simple correction group). All patients’ fixation and fusion segment ranged from upper thoracic spine to lumbar spine. Results The operative time and the blood loss were (384 ± 65) minutes and (4 160 ± 336) mL in total spondylectomy group, and were (246 ± 47) minutes and (1 450 ± 213) mL in simple correction group; showing significant differences (P lt; 0.05). In total spondylectomy group, coagulation disorder occurred in 1 case, pleural perforation in 4 cases, and lung infection in 1 case. In simple correcction group, pleural perforation occurred in 1 case. These patients were improved after symptomatic treatment. All patients were followed up 24-36 months (32.5 months on average). Bony heal ing was achieved at 6-12 months in total spondylectomy group. No breakage or pull ingout of internal fixator occurred. The angles of kyphosis and scol iosis were significantly improved at 1 week after operation (P lt; 0.01) when compared with those before operation. The correction rates of scol iosis and kyphosis (63.4% ± 4.6% and 72.1% ± 5.8%) in total spondylectomy group were better than those (69.4% ± 17.6% and 48.8% ± 19.3%) in simple correction group. Conclusion Suboccipital decompression before spine deformity correction may not always be necessary in adolescent scol iosis patients associated with Chiari I malformation. In patients with severe and rigid curve or apparente neurological deficits, posterior vertebral column resection would provide the opportunity of satisfied deformity correction and decrease the risk of neurological injury connected with surgical correction.