ObjectiveTo investigate the completion of early ambulation in patients with gastric cancer under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) management mode in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and analyze the influencing factors. MethodsFrom November 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022, the patients with gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria of this study in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were selected as the survey objects. At 48 h after the operation, the patients were enquired at the bedside and the electronic medical records were accessed to collect the general information, diseases information, etc. of the patients. The postoperative data were also investigated, and the time of early ambulation was investigated, and the influencing factors were analyzed by logistic regression. ResultsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study and the sample size requirements, 140 eligible patients with gastric cancer were investigated, 34 of whom got out of bed early, and the rate of early ambulation was 24.3%. The results of binary logistic regression analysis showed that indwelling urinary catheter within 48 h after operation [OR=10.031, 95%CI（1.037, 97.061）, P=0.046] and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade Ⅲ [OR=4.209, 95%CI（1.792, 9.886）, P=0.001] decreased the probability of early ambulation after operation in patients with gastric cancer. ConclusionsFrom the results of this survey, the completion rate of early ambulation in patients with gastric cancer under ERAS mode is lower, which may be improved by reducing the placement of the urinary catheter or shortening the indwelling time of the urinary catheter. For patients with ASA grade Ⅲ having functional decline before surgery, doctor or nurse needs to evaluate their mobility after surgery and help them to finish early ambulation or exercise on hospital bed within their tolerances.
Objective To explore the impact of the severity of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) on the quality of life in patients with rectal cancer. Methods Literatures published from January 2012 to August 2020 in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, WanFang and other databases were searched according to the search terms. Study screened, data extracted, and quality evaluated were conducted by three reviewers independently, and the RevMan 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. Results Seven studies, involving 1 616 patients were included. Meta-analysis results showed that the functional scores (including overall health status, physiological functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning) of patients with major LARS were lower than those of patients with no/minor LARS (P<0.001). Except for appetite loss, the symptom score (including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain), shortness of breath, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties of patients with major LARS were higher than those of patients with no/minor LARS (P<0.01). Conclusion Major LARS has a greater impact on the quality of life of patients after surgery than no/minor LARS.