ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between serum level of 25(OH)D3 and peripheral neuropathy in patients with impaired glucose tolerance. MethodsA total of 108 patients with impaired glucose tolerance treated or examined between January 2012 and July 2014 were recruited in this study. According to whether peripheral neuropathy was combined, the patients were divided into neuropathy group (n=50) and non-neuropathy group (n=58). The level of 25(OH)D3 was measured and compared between the two groups, and the correlation of 25(OH)D3 with the clinical indexes of impaired glucose tolerance was analyzed. ResultsThe level of 25(OH)D3 in the neuropathy group and non-neuropathy group was respectively (16.1±4.2) and (19.6±4.7) ng/mL with a significant difference (P<0.05). The 25(OH)D3 deficiency rate of the above two groups was respectively 80.0% and 41.38%, also with a significant difference (P<0.05). The 25(OH)D3 level had a negative correlation with body mass index (BMI) and glycosylated hemoglobin (P<0.05). Conclusions There is a significant relationship between impaired glucose tolerance and 25(OH)D3 level. The 25(OH)D3 level has a negative correlation with BMI and glycosylated hemoglobin.
Objective To explore the clinical application of tissue flap in repairing the residual cavity formed by breast conserving surgery. Methods Retrospective analysis for clinical data of 120 early breast cancer patients who received breast conserving surgery in our hospital from January 2013 to December 2016 was performed. Among them, 60 cases (observation group) were implemented tissue flap repairing operation while the other 60 cases (control group) were operated by using the traditional surgery method. The clinical data of the two groups were compared analytically in four aspects: postoperative complications, postoperative breast beauty, subjective satisfaction of patients, and postoperative recurrence and metastasis. Results ① Postoperative complications: 3 cases of complications occurred in the control groupand 2 cases in the observation group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between the 2 groups (χ2=0.209, P=0.648). ② Postoperative breast beauty: in the control group, there were 23 excellent cases, 16 good cases, 12 common cases, and 9 poor cases; in the observation group, there were 51 excellent cases, 5 good cases, 3 common cases, and 1 poor cases. The difference of postoperative breast beauty between the 2 groups was statistically significant (Z=–5.234, P<0.001). ③ Subjective satisfaction of patients: in the control group, 28 cases very satisfied, 18 cases satisfied, 12 cases generally satisfied, and 2 cases dissatisfied; in the observation group, 40 cases satisfied, 18 cases very satisfied, and 2 cases generally satisfied. The subjective satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was better than that of the control group (Z=–4.381, P<0.001). ④ Postoperative follow-up: no recurrence and death occurred in both of 2 groups, but 2 cases occurred metastasis in the control group and 1 case in the observation group. The contrast difference in the incidence of metastasis was not statistically significant (χ2=0.342, P=0.559). Conclusion During breast conserving surgery, the use of surrounding tissue flap to repair residual cavity, compared with traditional breast conserving surgery without tissue flap repairment, does not increase postoperative complications, recurrence, and metastasis, and it has good cosmetic effect after breast surgery, as well as the patients’ subjective satisfaction is good.