Objective To assess the efficiency of iodised salt on iodine deficiency disorders. Methods we searched MEDLINE (1996 to December 2009), EMbase (1974 to December 2009), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2009), Current Controlled Trials, The National Research Register, CBM (1983 to December 2009) and CNKI (1994 to December 2009), and traced the literature of the reference. The included objects were the resident of the iodine deficiency area and the age, the race. The sex was not limited. The fortified salt and the iodized salt effects were compared and the research quality was evaluated. Meta-analyses were conducted by the RevMan5.0 software. Results Eight studies involving 1 503 people were included. The goiter prevalence of the fortified salt which combined iodine with iron was lower than that of iodised salt [MD=1.22, 95%CI (0.90, 1.54)]. So was the thyroid gland volume [OR=1.88, 95%CI(1.01, 3.47)]. But the fortified salt which combined iodine with VA did not show this. Conclusion The fortified salt and the iodized salt can obviously improve the iodine nutritional status of people. The fortified salt has enhanced the effect while the iodized salt prevents iodine deficiency disorders, but more high grade randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effect of the round ligament fissure approach in re-hepatectomy.MethodsA total of 40 patients with recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent re-hepatectomy in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery of Leshan People’s Hospital from June 2017 to August 2020 were collected and divided into two groups according to different surgical approaches: study group (transhepatic round ligament fissure approach) and control group (conventional surgical approach), 20 cases in each group. The perioperative general indicators, peripheral blood laboratory indicators, and complications of the two groups were compared.ResultsCompared with the control group, the operation time, postoperative drainage tube removal time, and postoperative hospital stay of study group were shortened, and intraoperative blood loss was reduced (P<0.05). Compared with preoperatively in the same group, postoperative TBIL and ALT levels of the two groups decreased, and HGF levels increased (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the levels of TBIL, ALT, and HGF between the two groups before surgery (P>0.05); at 1 month after surgery, there was no significant difference in the levels of TBIL and ALT between the two groups (P>0.05), but the HGF level of the study group was higher than that of the control group at1 month after operation, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The changes before and after operation of TBIL and ALT were similar between the two groups (P>0.05), but the rising value of HGF in the study group was higher than that of the control group (P<0.001). There was no death in the two groups during the perioperative period, and the total postoperative complications were not statistically different (P=0.677). There was no statistically significant difference in the postoperative follow-up results between the two groups in recurrence, metastasis, and death (P>0.05).ConclusionRe-hepatectomy through the round ligament fissure approach can reduce the amount of intraoperative blood loss, shorten the operation time, and reduce the damage to the residual liver, which has high safety.
ObjectiveThis meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the feasibility and the safety of total laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (TLPD) by comparing it with open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD).MethodsWe searched the relative domestic and international data bases systematically, such as the Cochrane Library, Medline Database, SCI, CBM, VIP-data, CNKI-data, and WanFang Data. We selected case control studies or cohort studies, and used the Review Manager 5.3 to perform statistical analysis.ResultsIn total, thirteen single-center retrospective case-control studies were included, totally 808 patients involved, and there were 401 cases in the TLPD group and 407 cases in the OPD group. There were no significant difference in terms of the cumulative morbidity, incidence of the Clavien Ⅲ-Ⅴ complication, pancreatic fistula, B/C pancreatic fistula, biliary fistula, postoperative hemorrhage, pulmonary infection, and gastric emptying delay, as well as the ratio of secondary operation, mortality of perioperative period, the ration of R0 resection, and the number of lymph nodes dissected between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Although the operative time was significant longer, TLPD had significant superiority in terms of the amount of bleeding and blood transfusion during operation, the hospital stays after operation, the bowel function recovery time, the time to restart eating, and the time to reactivate (P<0.05).ConclusionIn terms of the relative complications and the parameters of oncology such as the ration of R0 resection, the number of lymph nodes dissected, both of the procedures are safe and feasible, while TLPD is more favorable to control operative bleeding and accelerate rehabilitation.
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical value and experience of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) of “LEER” model with “less pain” “early move” “early eat” and “reassuring” as its ultimate goal in perioperative period of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of patients with primary liver cancer.MethodsThe basic clinical data of 98 patients treated in our department from May 2017 to March 2020 who were diagnosed as primary liver cancer and underwent laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were retrospectively analyzed. The incidence of postoperative complications, postoperative recovery and patients’ satisfaction were compared between 40 patients managed with traditional model (traditional group) and 58 patients managed with measures of ERAS of “LEER” model (“LEER”-ERAS group).ResultsCompared with the traditional group, the “LEER”-ERAS group had lower postoperative pain scores (t=2.925, P=0.004), earlier postoperative anal exhaustion, bowel movement and normal diet (t=3.071, t=3.770, t=3.232, all P<0.005) , shorter time to postoperative off-bed activity (t=5.025, P<0.001) and earlier postoperative removal time of drainage tube (t=3.232, P=0.001). Postoperative hospital stay was shorter (t=4.831, P<0.001), the cost of hospitalization was lower (t=3.062, P=0.003), and the patient’s satisfaction with medical treatment was higher (χ2=9.267, P=0.002). There were no statistical difference in the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, rate of conversion to laparotomy, blocking time of porta hepatis, postoperative complications and postoperative adverse events between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsCompared with the traditional model, the measures of ERAS of “LEER” model that applied to laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of patients with primary liver cancer, is safe and effective, and can relieve postoperative pain, accelerate postoperative rehabilitation, improve satisfaction of patients, shorten hospital stay, and reduce medical costs. It has further promotion and research value.
ObjectiveTo investigate safety and effectiveness of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) in municipal hospitals.MethodsThe clinic data of patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in the Leshan People’s Hospital from November 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into LPD group and open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) group according to the operation methods, and the indicators of perioperative safety and effectiveness of the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 72 patients were enrolled in this study, including 30 patients in the LPD group and 42 patients in the OPD group. There were no significant differences in the age, gender, and other baseline indicators between the two groups (P>0.05). Although the operative time of the LPD group was longer than that of the OPD group (P<0.05), the intraoperative blood loss in the LPD group was significantly less than that in the OPD group (P<0.05), the postoperative hospital stay, postoperative exhaust time, and postoperative ambulation time in the LPD group were shorter than those in the OPD group (P<0.05). And there were no significant differences in the terms of intraoperative red blood cell transfusion, intraoperative blood transfusion rate, postoperative ICU hospitalization time, hospitalization expenses, overall complications and specific complications (except incision infection rate of LPD group was significantly lower than OPD group, P=0.031) between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the positive rate of resection margin, number of lymph node dissection, and positive rate of lymph node between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionLPD has the same safety and effectiveness as OPD in the perioperative period in municipal hospitals, and is more conducive to postoperative recovery of patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical value of laparoscopic cholecystectomy following “A-B-D” approach applied in the operation of acute suppurative or gangrenous cholecystitis.MethodsWe sought out 45 patients diagnosed as acute suppurative or gangrenous cholecystitis and treated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy following the “A-B-D” approach in People’s Hospital of Leshan from Sep. 2019 to Dec. 2020 as the observation group (ABD observation group), and sought out 50 patients with the same diseases but treated by conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy from Jun. 2018 to Aug. 2019 as the matched group (conventional matched group). We analyzed and compared the parameters related to safety and efficacy of the two groups retrospectively.ResultsA total of 95 patients were included, including 45 patients in the ABD observation group (26 cases of acute suppurative cholecystitis, 19 cases of acute gangrenous cholecystitis) and 50 patients in the conventional matched group (24 cases of acute suppurative cholecystitis, 26 cases of acute gangrenous cholecystitis). There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index, disease composition, gallbladder condition, and preoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no bile duct injury case in the ABD observation group (0), while there were 4 cases (8.0%) in the conventional matched group, but the statistical results showed no statistical significance between the two groups (P=0.054). One case (2.2%) in the ABD observation group converted to laparotomy, which was significantly lower than the 10 cases (20.0%) in the conventional matched group, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.017). In addition, there were no significant differences for other parameters including operative time, postoperative hospital stay, incidences of intraoperative bleeding and postoperative bleeding between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionsThe laparoscopic cholecystectomy following the “A-B-D” approach can help distinguish the anatomical structure of cystic duct and extrahepatic bile duct clearly, and it can help prevent biliary tract injury effectively and reduce the probability of conversion to laparotomy. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion, especially in the majority of county hospitals.