Objective To investigate the difference in acetabular tilt angle (ATA) between adults with deve-lopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and normal adults and the effect of ATA on acetabular version. Methods Between February 2009 and October 2015, 31 adult female patients with DDH (39 hips) (DDH group) and 31 female patients with osteoarthritis of the knee (31 hips) who had no history of hip disease (control group) were included in this study. The average age was 39 years (range, 18-59 years) in the DDH group, and was 69 years (range, 52-79 years) in control group. The morphometric parameters of the acetabulum including ATA, acetabular anteversion angle (AAA), acetabular inclination angle (AIA), acetabular cranial anteversion angle (ACAA), and acetabular sector angle (ASA) were mea- sured by CT reconstruction; The ASA was used as an index for acetabular coverage of the femoral head. The correlation between ATA and other parameters was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. Results The values of ATA, AAA, and AIA of the DDH group were significantly larger than those of the control group (P<0.05). The ASA in all directions was significantly decreased in the DDH group when compared with the values in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in ACAA between two groups (t=1.918, P=0.523). The ATA was positively correlated with AAA and ACAA in the DDH group (r=0.439, P=0.001; r=0.436, P=0.002), but there was no correlation between ATA and AIA (r=0.123, P=0.308). In the control group, the ATA was not correlated with AAA, ACAA, and AIA (r=–0.004, P=0.724; r=–0.079, P=0.626; r=–0.058, P=0.724). Regarding acetabular coverage of the femoral head, the ATA and AAA were correlated negatively with anterior ASA (P<0.05) and positively with posterior ASA (P<0.05), but had no correlation with superior ASA (P>0.05) in the DDH group; AIA was correlated negatively with anterior ASA and superior ASA (P<0.05) and had no correlation with posterior ASA (r=–0.092, P=0.440). In the control group, there was no correlation between ATA and ASA in any direction (P>0.05). In the DDH group, defects of the acetabular anterior wall, lateral wall, and posterior wall were observed in 18 hips (46.2%), 15 hips (38.5%), and 6 hips (15.3%), respectively. ATA value of the posterior wall defect [(15.70±10.00)°] was significantly smaller than those of the acetabular anterior wall and lateral wall defects [(22.91±5.06)° and (21.59±3.81) °] (P<0.05), but no signficant difference was found between anterior wall and lateral wall defects (P>0.05). Conclusion ATA will influence acetabular version in DDH. The anterior rotation of the acetabular fragment during periacetabular osteotomies is an anatomically reasonable maneuver for hips with anterolateral acetabular defect, while the maneuver should be avoided in hips with posterior acetabular defect.
ObjectiveTo discuss the effect of Piezo1 mechanically sensitive protein in migration process of mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells.MethodsThe 5th-10th generation mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts were divided into Piezo1-small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection group (group A), negative control group (group B), and blank control group (group C). Piezo1-siRNA or negative control siRNA was transfected into mouse MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts by siRNA transfection reagent, respectively; group C was only added with siRNA transfection reagent; and the cell morphology was observed under inverted phase contrast microscope and fluorescence microscope, and the transfection efficiency was calculated. The expression of Piezo1 protein was detected by immunofluorescence staining and Western blot. Transwell cell migration assay and cell scratch assay were used to detect the migration of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts after Piezo1-siRNA transfection.ResultsAfter 48 hours of transfection, group A showed a slight increase in cell volume and mutant growth, but cell colonies decreased, suspension cells increased and cell fragments increased when compared with untransfected cells. Under fluorescence microscope, green fluorescence was observed in MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts of group B, and the transfection efficiency was 68.56%±4.12%. Immunofluorescence staining and Western blot results showed that the expression level of Piezo1 protein in group A was significantly lower than that in groups B and C (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P>0.05). Transwell cell migration assay and cell scratch assay showed that the number of cells per hole and the scratch healing rate of cells cultured for 1-4 days in group A were significantly lower than those in groups B and C (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between group B and group C (P>0.05).ConclusionPiezo1 knocked down by siRNA can inhibit the migration ability of MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cells.
Adapting the existing guidelines in the context of specific regions can improve the efficiency of guidelines development, and reduce cost and time for developing guidelines. ADOLOPMENT is a methodological tool for guidelines adaptation, which was developed by the GRADE Working Group based on the standardized international guidelines making process. With ADOLOPMENT, developers can effectively use existing guidelines and evidence, avoid duplication of the evidence evaluation, and record the process from evidence to recommendations, which will ensure the transparency of adaptation, help users to understand the process, and improve the acceptability and credibility of guideline adaptation. This paper aims to introduce the ADOLOPMENT and its application.
The focus of health equity is to enable the public to have fair access to health services and achieve satisfactory health outcomes. With research developments, guideline developers increasingly pay more attention to the fairness in the practice guidelines and have carried out exploration and practice in the relevant guidelines. The GRADE working group has begun to investigate how to use GRADE to assess health equity in practice guidelines since 2014. In 2017, the series of methodological guidelines of health equity in guideline development was officially published. It proposed 5 approaches to evaluate health equity and pointed out current methodological challenges of applying GRADE to assess health equity. This paper aims to introduce the GRADE equity guidelines, so as to provide a reference for Chinese researchers in their practice.