Objective To discuss the pathogeny， treatment and prophylactic measures of postcholecystectomy syndrome (PCS). Methods The clinical data of 150 patients with laparoscopic PCS in our department from October 2000 to March 2009 were analyzed. Results Etiological factors were found in 131 patients: one hundred and twelve cases were due to the reasons of biliary system, including bile duct residual stones after cystic resection， the injury bile duct stenosis， a long residual cystic canal， nipple benign stricture, bile duct tumor etc; Nineteen examples were due to other reasons, including gallbladder stone merger reflux gastritis, gastroduodenal ulcer， diverticulum beside duodenal nipple, and so on, which resulted in the symptoms un-release after cystic resection. Nineteen cases were not found organic lesion. In ones whose etiological factors were definite, 117 cases were treated with different surgeries according to different etiological factors; another 33 cases were treated with conservative treatment. Total 145 cases were followed up, and 139 cases in them were cured or relieved at different degrees. Conclusion Careful preoperative examination, normalized operation avoiding damaging bile duct and leaving behind bile duct stones can effectively prevent laparoscopic PCS.
Objective To discussion the surgical approach of laparoscopic resection of left hepatic lobe. Methods The clinical data of 86 patients with Intr- and extra-hepatic bile duct stones and liver hemangioma were analyzed retros-pectivly. Eighty-six patients underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy. Forty-nine cases underwent the left hepatic lobe resectionby the left longitudinal groove （left longitudinal groove group）， 37 cases underwent the left hepatic lobe resection by the first hepatic portal （first porta hepatis group）. The operative time， intraoperative bleeding volume， postoperative hospital stay， and postoperative complications of two kinds of operation were compared. Results The operative time and intraoperative bleeding volume of left longitudinal groove group were shorter or less than those of the first porta hepatis group 〔（142±123）min vs. （208±58）min，P＜0.05； （320.5±38.3）mL vs. （450.9±39.1）mL，P＜0.05〕. There were no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in complication and hospitalization after operation （P＞0.05）. Conclusion The left hepatic lobe resection by the left longitudinal groove is more safe and fast.