Objective To summarize the current research progress of second sacral alar-iliac (S2AI) screw technique for reconstruction of spinopelvic stability. Methods The recent original literature concerning development, clinical applications, anatomy, imageology, and biomechanics of S2AI screw technique in reconstruction of spinopelvic stability was reviewed and analyzed. Results As a common clinical strategy for the reconstruction of spinopelvic stability, S2AI screws achieve satisfactory effectiveness of lumbosacral fixation without complications which were found during the application of traditional iliac screws technique. S2AI screw technique is more difficult to place screws by hand because of its narrow screw trajectory. Although the S2AI screws trajectory pass through 3 layers of bone cortex, the biomechanical cadaveric study demonstrate that no statistical difference in stiffness was found between the traditional iliac and S2AI screw in a spinopelvic fixation model. Conclusion S2AI screw technique should be a safe and feasible method for reconstruction of spinopelvic stability in place of the traditional iliac screw technique.
Objective To biomechanically compare the maximum pull-out strengths among two pedicle screws and three salvage techniques using poly methylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation in osteoporotic sacrum, and to determine which PMMA augmentation technique could serve as the salvage fixation for loosening sacral pedicle screws. Methods Eleven sacra were harvested from fresh adult donated cadavers, aged from 66 to 83 years (average 74.4 years) and included 5 men and 6 women. Radiography was used to exclude sacra that showed tumor or inflammatory or any other anatomic abnormal ities. Following the measurement of bone mineral density, five sacral screw fixations were sequentially establ ished on the same sacrum as follows: unicortical pedicle screw (group A), bicortical pedicle screw (group B), unicortical pedicle screw with the traditional PMMA augmentation (group C), ala screw with the traditional PMMA augmentation (group D), and ala screw with a kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmentation technique (group E). According to the sequence above, the axial pull-out test of each screw was conducted on a MTS-858 material testing machine. The maximum pull-out forces were measured and compared. The morphologies of PMMA augmented screws after being pulled-out were also inspected. Results The average bone mineral density of 11 osteoporotic specimens was (0.71 ± 0.08) g/cm2 . By observation of the pull-out screws, groups C, D, E showed perfect bonding with PMMA, and group E bonded more PMMA than groups C and D. The maximum pull-out forces of groups A, B, C, D, and E were (508 ± 128), (685 ± 126), (846 ± 230), (543 ± 121), and (702 ± 144) N, respectively. The maximum pull-out strength was significantly higher in groups B, C, and E than in groups A and D (P lt; 0.05), and in group C than in groups B and E (P lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in pull-out strength between groups A and D, and between groups B and E (P gt; 0.05). Conclusion For sacral screw fixation of osteoporotic patients with bone mineral density more than 0.7 g/cm2, bicortical pedicle screw could acquire significantly higher fixation strength than the unicortical. Once the loosening of pedicle screw occurs, the traditional PMMA augmentation or ala screw with kyphoplasty-assisted PMMA augmentation may serve as a suitable salvage technique.
Objective To evaluate the biomechanical effect of a self-made iliac screw plate on the stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct before and after fatigue loading. Methods Twelve fresh lumbo-pelvic specimens from donated adult cadavers with formalin embalm were used in the study. According to whether use the iliac screw plate or not, the specimens were randomly assigned into group A (with iliac screw plate, n=6) and group B (without iliac screw plate, n=6). The bone mineral density (BMD) of L1-4 was measured using dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry. The pedicle screw and iliac screw fixation were given at L3-5, and bilateral facetectomy and diskectomy at L5, S1 level were performed to prepare the model of the intervertebral destabilization. The biomechanical testing was conducted on a material testing machine under 0-600 N compression and — 7-7 N · m torsion loading modes for the initial compressive stiffness and torsional stiffness evaluation. And then 20 000 cyclic compressive loading of 40-400 N was given to the specimen, the stiffness evaluation was repeated. Then the maximum pull-out strength of screws at every level was measured and compared. Gross observation and radiological observation were performed during experiment. Results The BMD values of groups A and B were (1.15 ± 0.13) g/cm2 and (1.12 ± 0.11) g/ cm2 respectively, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (t=0.428, P=0.678). All pedicle screws and iliac screws were inserted in good position; no loosening or breaking of screw was observed during loading. After fatigue loading, the incidence of halo ring around the iliac screws of groups A and B was 16.7% (1/6) and 50.0% (3/6), respectively. The compressive stiffness and torsional stiffness after fatigue loading were significantly lower than those in initial state in groups A and B (P lt; 0.05); there was no significant difference in compressive stiffness and torsional stiffness between groups A and B before fatigue loading (P gt; 0.05). However, group A had higher compressive stiffness than group B (t=2.664, P=0.024) after fatigue loading, and there was no significant difference in torsional stiffness between 2 groups (t=0.410, P=0.690). No significant difference was found in screw pull-out strength of pedicle screws at L3, L4, and L5 levels between groups A and B (P gt; 0.05); however, the pull-out strength of the iliac screws in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (t=3.398, P=0.007). In groups A and B, the pull-out strength of L3 screw was significantly lower than that of L4 and L5 screws (P lt; 0.05). In group A, pull-out strength of the iliac screws was significantly higher than that of L3, L4, and L5 screws (P lt; 0.05); in group B, the pull-out strength of iliac screws was significantly lower than that of L4 and L5 screws (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion In the lumbo-iliac reconstruction, the use of iliac screw plate could resist iliac screw loosening, therefore, it has the potential to increase the stability of lumbo-iliac fixation construct.
Objective To evaluate the effects of sacrectomy extent on the stabil ity of lumbo-il iac fixation using single or dual il iac screw technique, and to determine which conditions require the dual il iac screw technique. Methods Nine fresh L2 to pelvic specimens were harvested from donated adult cadavers. After testing the intact state simulated by L3-5 pedicle screw fixation, sequential partial sacrectomies and L3 to il iac fixation using bilateral single il iac screw (Single) wereconducted on the same specimen as follows: in group A, under S1 partial sacrectomy and Single; in group B, under 1/2 S1 partial sacrectomy and Single; in group C, one-side (left) sacroil iac joint resection and Single; in group D, total sacrectomy and Single; and in group E, the single il iac screw was replaced by dual il iac screws based on group D. Biomechanical testing was performed on a material testing machine under 0-800 N compression and —7-7 N•m torsion loading modes for construct stiffness evaluation. Results The compressive stiffness of intact condition was (392 ± 119) N/mm, groups A, B, C, D, and E obtained 106.4% ± 9.5%, 102.7% ± 8.0%, 92.2% ± 10.1%, 72.7% ± 8.0%, and 107.7% ± 10.7% of intact condition, respectively. No significant differences were found among groups A, B, C, and the intact state (P gt; 0.05), however, the four groups showed significantly higher compressive stiffness than group D (P lt; 0.05). Although group E exhibited a comparable compressive stiffness with groups A, B, and intact state (P gt; 0.05), it displayed markedly higher compressive stiffness than groups C and D (P lt; 0.05). The torsional stiffness of intact state was (3.22 ± 1.23) N•m/deg. Groups A, B, C, D, and E acquired 105.4% ± 10.1%, 89.8% ± 12.3%, 75.9% ± 10.6%, 71.2% ± 10.2%, and 109.1% ± 16.9% of intact state, respectively. No significant differences were detected among groups A, B, E, and the intact state (P gt; 0.05). However, groups C and D showed remarkably lower torsional stiffness than groups A, E, and the intact state (P lt; 0.05). Importantly, group E offered remarkably higher torsional stiffness than group B (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion After under 1/2 S1 partial sacrectomy, single il iac screw technique could effectively restore local stabil ity; whereas it could hardly provide adequate stabil ity for further resection of one-side sacroil iac joint or total sacrectomy; in such situation, the use of dual il iac screw technique could obtain sufficient construct stabil ity. Therefore, in the surgical treatment of sacral tumor, the dual il iac screw technique should be considered for the unstable conditions of totalsacrectomy or under 1/2 S1 sacrectomy with one-side sacroil iac joint resection.
Objective To compare the maximum pull-out strength of the upper il iac screw and lower il iac screw with and without polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation, and to provide the experimental evidences for the rational use of il iacscrews. Methods Ten intact human il ium from 5 donated cadavers with formal in embalmed were selected. The bone mineral density (BMD) of L1-4 of each cadaver was measured with a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The screws placed in the upper and lower il iac column were named as the upper and lower il iac screw, respectively. Using 70 mm length and 7.5 mm diameter screws with and without PMMA augmentation, 4 il iac screw technique models were sequentially establ ished and tested as follows: upper il iac screw (group A), upper il iac screw with PMMA augmentation (group B), lower il iac screw (group C), and lower il iac screw with PMMA augmentation (group D). Each il ium was mounted on a material testing machine with its position similar to standing. Under 2 000 cycl ic compressive loadings of 100-300 N to the screw, the maximum pull-out strength of il iac screw was measured. Results The BMD value of the 5 human cadavers was (0.88 ± 0.06) g/cm2. All the il iac screws were inserted into the screw tracts accurately as expected. No screw penetrations of acetabulum or cortex was not observed through visual inspection. There was no “halo” ring sign surrounding any screw after the 2 000 cycle loading. The maximum pull-out strengths of groupsA, B, C, and D were (964 ± 250), (1 462 ± 266), (1 537 ± 279), and (1 964 ± 422) N, respectively. Group D exhibited the highest maximum pull-out strength among the 4 groups (P lt; 0.05). No significant difference was detected between groups B and C (P gt; 0.05); however, groups B, C showed higher maximum pull-out strength than group A (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion The lower il iac screw offers significantly higher fixation strength than the upper il iac screw; PMMA augmentation could effectively increase the fixation strength of il iac screws and therefore could be appl ied in the salvage of il iac screw loosening.