Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection is common worldwide, and the first-line eradication regimen recommended by domestic and foreign guidelines faces many challenges in practical application. In order to further improve the HP eradication rate and patient compliance, problems such as increased antibiotic resistance, a wide variety of drugs, and obvious drug side effects need to be solved urgently. In recent years, high-dose dual therapy of amoxicillin combined with proton pump inhibitor have achieved good eradication effect in the treatment of HP infection. This article reviews the action mechanism, safety and therapeutic effect of high-dose dual therapy, aiming to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Objective To evaluate the clinical value and safety of adenosine monophosphate( AMP)bronchoprovocation test in patients with asthma. Methods Sixty asthmatics, including 19 cases with uncontrolled asthma, 22 with partially controlled asthma, and 19 with controlled asthma were enrolled. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were enrolled as control and 20 patients with upper respiratory tract infection ( URI) were also included. AMP bronchoprovocation test ( AMP-BPT) was performed. PD20 FEV1-AMP lt;40 mg was set as a cut-off value of positive response to AMP. Positive rate, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and adverse reactions of AMP-BPT were evaluated. Eleven cases with uncontrolled asthma and 12 cases with partially controlled asthma were followed up with AMP-BPT three months and six months after inhaledcorticosteroids treatment. Asthma symptom scores were recorded a week early before each challenge. The correlation between PD20FEV1 -AMP and asthma symptom score was analyzed. Values of PD20 FEV1 -AMP were represented as median and quartile range [ M( QR) ] . Results No positive responses to AMP were found in both healthy and URI subjects. On the other hand, positive responses to AMP were found in all the uncontrolled asthmatics ( 100% ) with PD20FEV1 -AMP as 0. 6 mg ( 0. 4 mg) , in 19 partially controlled asthmatics ( 86. 4% ) with PD20 FEV1 -AMP as 5. 38 mg ( 32. 67 mg ) , and in 5 controlled asthmatics( 26. 3% ) with PD20FEV1 -AMP as 40 mg ( 29. 3 mg) . There were negative correlations between the logarithms of PD20 FEV1 -AMP and logarithms of asthma symptom scores ( r = - 0. 598, P lt; 0. 01) . The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy was 72% , 100%, and 84% , respectively. Percentage of subjects who experienced wheezing, cough, dyspnea, swallows stimulation, chest tightness, expectoration and cyanosis during AMP-BPT were 37. 5%, 21. 2%, 15. 4%,7. 7%, 7. 7%, 4. 8%, and 1. 0%, respectively. No severe adverse reaction was found. Conclusions AMP-BPT is helpful to the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of bronchial asthma. It also can be used to evaluate the severity and control level, and to monitor the therapeutic efficacy in clinical practice. Moreover, AMP-BPT is well tolerated with little adverse reaction.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. Methods The clinical data of patients with HP infection who were treated in Suining Central Hospital between June 2020 and August 2021 were retrospectively collected. They were divided into HDDT group and bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) group according to the treatment regimen. The efficacy and adverse reactions of the two treatment regimens were observed. Results A total of 520 patients were included. Among them, there were 284 cases in the HDDT group and 236 cases in the BQT group. By propensity score matching, 223 pairs of patients were successfully matched. The eradication rates of HDDT and BQT were 74.4% and 77.1%, respectively (χ2=0.440, P=0.507), and the incidence of adverse reactions were 9.9% and 16.6%, respectively (χ2=4.395, P=0.036). Conclusion The efficacy of HDDT and BQT in the treatment of HP infection is comparable, but the former has fewer adverse reactions.
ObjectiveTo determine the ability of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to distinguish chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) from chronic thromboembolic disease (CTED). MethodsFifty patients diagnosed with CTED and fifty-eight patients with CTEPH in the the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from April 2019 to February 2022 were retrospectively included. The basic characteristics including age, gender, body mass index, symptom duration, and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NTpro-BNP), parameters of arterial blood gas analysis, right heart catheterization, echocardiography, pulmonary function, and CPET were all compared between patients with CTED and those with CTEPH. ResultsPatients with CTEPH displayed longer symptom duration, increased NTpro-BNP, decreased arterial partial pressure of oxygen, larger right atrial and ventricular diameters, and impaired worse resting pulmonary diffusing function compared with those with CTED (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the resting pulmonary ventilation function between the two groups (P>0.05). Among the CPET parameters of the CTEPH group, peak exercise oxygen uptake per kilogram, oxygen uptake at anaerobic threshold, oxygen pulse, oxygen uptake efficiency slope and oxygen saturation were all decreased, while the minute ventilation-carbon dioxide production at anaerobic threshold (VE/VCO2@AT) and VE/VCO2 slope were increased (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in heart rate reserve and breathing reserve (P>0.05). Furthermore, VE/VCO2@AT showed high accuracy for distinguishing CTEPH from CTED (sensitivity, 0.825; specificity, 0.860; and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.897). ConclusionsPatients with CTEPH showed more significant decreased exercise endurance, diffusion dysfunction, and hypoxemia during exercise and insufficient increase in cardiac output compared with CTED patients. Therefore, it is feasible to apply CPET as a new objective examination to distinguish CTED from CTEPH.
ObjectiveTo investigate the static pulmonary function and cardiopulmonary exercise function of convalescent patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after discharge.MethodsPulmonary function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity of COVID-19 patients who admitted to our hospital from January to March 2020 were analyzed. The patients were divided into a non-critical group (3 cases of moderate illness, 2 cases of severe illness) and a critical group (5 cases of critical illness). Five of the 10 patients completed spirometry on day 14 after discharge. All patients performed spirometry, diffusion capacity and cardiopulmonary exercise test around 28 days post-discharge. Ten healthy subjects were used as a control group.ResultsForced expiratory volume in one second of percent predicted (FEV1%pred), forced vital capacity of percent predicted (FVC%pred), the FEV1/FVC ratio (FEV1/FVC), peak expiratory flow of percent predicted (PEF%pred) and mean forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of percent predicted (FEF25%-75%%pred) of COVID-19 group were all within normal ranges, and there were no significant difference between COVID-19 group and the healthy group (P>0.05). Diffusion capacity (the carbon monoxide diffusion capacity of percent predicted, DLCO%pred) decreased in 3 patients. The peak oxygen uptake of percent predicted (PeakVO2%pred), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), Oxygen pulse of percent predicted (VO2/HR%pred) in COVID-19 group decreased and were statistically significantly lower than the control group (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference in ventilatory equivalents for carbon dioxide at anaerobic threshold (VE/VCO2@AT) and the slope of ventilatory equivalent for carbon dioxide (VE/VCO2 slope) between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared to the non-critical group, the critical group displayed significantly lower FVC%pred and VO2/HR%pred (P<0.05). A decrease in PeakVO2%pred was observed in critical group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05). The FVC%pred and PEF%pred were significantly improved in 5 COVID-19 convalescents on Day 28 after discharge when comparing with day 14 (P<0.05).ConclusionsIn the first month after discharge, recovered COVID-19 patients mainly presented decreased exercise endurance in cardiopulmonary function tests.There are also some survivors with reduced diffusion function, but the impaired lung function of COVID-19 patients might return over time.