Objective To explore the effectiveness and safety of Pacman flap for repair of eyelid and periocular soft tissue defects. Methods The clinical data of 12 patients who underwent repair of eyelid and periocular soft tissue defects with Pacman flap between April 2015 and September 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. There were 5 males and 7 females, aged from 18 to 87 years, with a median age of 63 years. The disease duration ranged from 6 months to 50 years, with a median time of 3 years. The defect was located on the lateral eyelid in 5 cases, inferior eyelid in 3 cases, inferior and medial eyelid in 2 cases, inferior and lateral eyelid in 2 cases, and lateral eyebrow in 1 case. Pathological diagnosis included 4 cases of basal cell carcinoma, 4 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, 1 case of junction nevus, 1 case of intradermal nevus, 1 case of seborrheic keratosis, and 1 case of keratoacanthoma. The size of defects ranged from 1.4 cm×1.2 cm to 5.5 cm×5.0 cm. According to the skin mobility and toughness around the defects, Pacman flaps with the size of 1.6 cm×1.4 cm to 10.0 cm×6.0 cm were designed and advanced to repair the defects. ResultsAll flaps survived completely with no necrosis. One patient had infection, and another patient had partial wound dehiscence, but the wounds healed after dressing change without further debridement. Other patients all recovered successfully. The follow-up time ranged from4 to 51 months, with a median time of 12 months. No recurrence and metastasis occurred, and the scars were invisible without deformity of eyelid and brow. All patients were satisfied with the aesthetic and functional outcomes of the eyes. ConclusionPacman flap is a simple and feasible technique for repair of eyelid and periocular soft tissue defects, with satisfactory effectiveness.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of dual-pedicle abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.MethodsBetween March 2014 and March 2018, a clinical data of 19 female patients underwent dual-pedicle abdominal flap reconstruction because of unilateral mastectomy defect was reviewed retrospectively. The median age was 45 years (range, 32-51 years), including 3 immediate breast reconstruction and 16 delayed breast reconstruction, and left side in 7 cases and right side in 12 cases. Unilateral breast reconstruction were performed for 8 patients with unilateral pedicle transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap and contralateral free TRAM flap, for 3 patients with pedicle TRAM flap and contralateral deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, for 7 patients with bilateral DIEP flaps, for 1 patient with free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and contralateral DIEP flap. The size of abdominal flap ranged from 24 cm×7 cm to 43 cm×13 cm. The donor sites were closed directly.ResultsVascular crisis ocuurred in 1 flap and relieved after surgical exploration. The other flaps survived. Poor wound healing in abdominal incision occurred in 1 patient and was successfully treated with debridement. The other donor sites healed without any other complication. The patients were followed up with a median period of 12 months (range, 4-42 months). Four patients received reparative operation of their reconstructive breast, and 2 patients received mamopexy of the contralateral breast due to mastoptosis. The abdominal BREAST-Q score was 84.1±11.7, chest score was 86.5±8.9, and breast score was 67.6±16.4 at last follow-up.ConclusionThe dual-pedicle abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction provides adequate soft tissue volume and good blood supply. It is a reliable and effective breast reconstructive method for patients who need large tissue volume to make symmetric with the contralateral breast, or slim patients with few tissue in the donor site, or patients with scars in the donor site, especially vertical abdominal scars.