Objective To study efficacy of ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in combination with foam sclerotherapy and foam sclerotherapy alone in treatment of venous leg ulcer. Method Fifty-seven patients with venous leg ulcers from January 2015 to December 2016 in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collected, then were designed to ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in combination with foam sclerotherapy group (abbreviated as combination therapy group, n=33) and foam sclerotherapy alone group (n=24). Results The baseline data such as the age, gender, disease duration, and ulcer size had no significant differences in these two groups (P>0.05). All the patients received operation successfully. The median operative time was shorter, the average intraoperative blood loss was less, and the time of ulcer healing after surgery was longer in the foam sclerotherapy alone group as compared with the combination therapy group [14 minversus 40 min, P<0.001; (12.3±3.2) mLversus (35.5±10.0) mL, P<0.001; (22.0±4.5) dversus (13.7±4.0) d, P<0.001]. The rates of the wound infection, local pigmentation, and ulcer recurrence had no significant differences between the foam sclerotherapy alone group and the combination therapy group (4.2%versus 9.1%, P=0.472; 25.0% versus 15.2%, P=0.352; 20.8% versus 9.1%, P=0.208). The foam sclerotherapy alone group was obviously superior to the combination therapy group in the time and cost of hospitalization (4 d versus 13 d, P<0.001; 3 000 yuanversus 8 590 yuan, P<0.001). There was no large area of tissue necrosis, the deep vein thrombosis, or the other serious complications in these two groups. Conclusion Ligation and stripping of great saphenous vein in combination with foam sclerotherapy in treatment of venous leg ulcer can accelerate ulcer healing than foam sclerotherapy alone, but there is no significant difference between these two groups in complications and recurrence rate, the foam sclerotherapy alone group is superior in time and cost of hospitalization, appropriate treatment plan should be formulated according to specific situation of patient.
Objective To compare the effect of high ligation and spot stripping (HLSS) and high ligation and foam sclerotherapy (HLFS) in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins (GSVV). Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 385 patients with GSVV who received HLFS or HLSS treatment at Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022. The differences in surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, complications, and postoperative hospital stay between the two groups were compared. Results The surgical time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative hospital stay, visual analog scale for pain, incidence of postoperative hematoma, skin sensory disorders, and infection in the HLFS group were less or lower than those in the HLSS group (P<0.05), but there was no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with preoperative indicators at the same group, the modified venous clinical severity score (VCSS) decreased and the chronic lower limb venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score increased (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the degree of improvement in VCSS and CIVIQ between the two groups at three months after surgery and before surgery (P>0.05). Conclusions HLFS has a definite therapeutic effect on GSVV, with smaller trauma, faster recovery after surgery, and lower incidence of postoperative complication compared to HLSS. It can be used as a surgical option for GSVV patients in clinical practice.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical effects of unilateral neck exploration (UNE) and direct minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (DPT) in the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). MethodsThe clinical datas of 87 PHPT patients treated with intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring (IPM) -assisted UNE and DMIP in Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThe average age of patients was (47.5±13.1) years, and there were 24 males (27.6%) and 63 females (72.4%). The pathological types of 87 cases were parathyroid adenoma in 78 cases (89.7%), atypical parathyroid adenoma in 5 cases (5.7%), parathyroid hyperplasia in 4 cases (4.6%), and no parathyroid carcinoma. Two cases (2.3%) developed recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and 3 cases (3.4%) developed postoperative persistent hyperparathyroidism, of which 1 (1.1%) case underwent secondary surgery. There were no significant differences in the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (2.0% vs. 2.6%, P=0.855) and postoperative persistent hyperparathyroidism between the UNE group and the DMIP group (2.0% vs. 5.3%, P=0.713). However, the intraoperative bleeding volume, operative time, hospitalization time, incision length, and pain score in the DMIP group were significantly less than or shorter than or lower than those in the UNE group (P<0.001). ConclusionThere is no significant difference in the efficacy between the DMIP and UNE in the treatment of PHPT, but DMIP can significantly shorten the operative time and hospitalization time, and reduce the trauma.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) combined with anticoagulation (AC) and AC in the treatment of acute proximal deep venous thrombosis (APDVT) of the lower extremities. MethodsThe clinical data of 184 APDVT patients treated in Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2017 to December 2022 were retrospectively collected. According to the treatment methods, the patients were divided into CDT group (n=82, CDT combined with AC) and AC group (n=102, AC alone). The prognosis indicators such as the incidence of bleeding events, the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), Villalta score, venous clinical severity score (VCSS) and chronic lower limb venous insufficiency questionnaire (CIVIQ) score were compared between the two groups. ResultsCompared with the AC group, the CDT group had a higher incidence of bleeding events [11.0% (9/82) vs. 2.9% (3/102)], a shorter time to detumescent [(2.8±1.2) d vs. (7.2±1.9) d], and lower VS score [3 (2,4) vs. 3 (2, 7)], VCSS score [2.0 (1.7, 4.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0, 5.2)] and postoperative venous patency score [1 (1, 2) vs. 2 (1, 3)], and higher CIVIQ score [80.0 (77.0, 86.0) vs. 71.5 (68.0, 78.0)], P<0.05. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of PTS [28.2% (22/78) vs. 36.5% (35/96)] and thrombosis recurrence rate [9.0% (7/78) vs. 11.5% (11/96)] between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionCDT can relieve the symptoms and improve the quality of life of APDVT faster than AC, but it is necessary to strictly grasp the indications of thrombolysis to reduce the risk of bleeding.